Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Robust Micro-Macro Entangled States

Published 30 Oct 2024 in quant-ph | (2410.22913v1)

Abstract: Bipartite entangled states between a qubit and macroscopically distinct states of a mesoscopic system, known as micro-macro entangled states, are emerging resources for quantum information processing. One main challenge in generating such states in the lab is their fragility to environmental noise. We analyze this fragility in detail for single particle noise by identifying what factors play a role in the robustness and quantifying their effect. There is a trade-off between the macroscopicity of a micro-macro entangled state and the robustness of its bipartite entanglement to environmental noise. We identify symmetric micro-macro entangled states as the most robust states to single particle noise. We show that the robustness of bipartite entanglement of such states to single particle noise decreases as the second order of macroscopicity, which identifies a regime where the bipartite entangled state is both robust and macroscopic. Our result is a step towards retaining quantum characteristics on large scales and experimental realization of micro-macro entangled spin states and their use for connecting separated qubits. Moreover, it advances our understanding of quantum to classical transition.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935).
  2. W. H. Zurek,  arXiv:quant-ph/0306072 .
  3. A. J. Leggett, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R415 (2002).
  4. M. S. Mirkamali and D. G. Cory, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032320 (2020).
  5. A. Shimizu and T. Miyadera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 270403 (2002).
  6. C.-W. Lee and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 220401 (2011).
  7. Particle loss for spin system is equivalent to complete depolarization and can be a model of T1subscript𝑇1T_{1}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relaxation.
  8. W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  9. G. Björk and P. G. L. Mana, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 6, 429 (2004).
  10. E. G. Cavalcanti and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170405 (2006).
  11. E. G. Cavalcanti and M. D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062108 (2008).
  12. F. Fröwis and W. Dür, New Journal of Physics 14, 093039 (2012).
  13. S. Nimmrichter and K. Hornberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 160403 (2013).
  14. B. Yadin and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022356 (2015).
  15. In fact in order to get the best distinctness one needs to choose the measurement axis along the quantization axis.
  16. R. Horodecki and P. Horodecki, Physics Letters A 194, 147 (1994).
  17. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  18. This condition is always satisfied for a micro-macro entangled state.
  19. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.