Evaluating Progress in Web3 Grants: Introducing the Grant Maturity Index
Abstract: This report introduces the Grant Maturity Index (GMI), a novel evaluative framework designed to assess the maturity and operational effectiveness of Web3 grant programs. As Web3 continues to develop, the decentralized nature of these programs brings both opportunities and challenges, particularly when it comes to governance, transparency, and community engagement. Traditional funding models are often governed by standardized processes, but Web3 grants lack such consistency, making it difficult for grant operators to measure the long-term success of their programs.The Grant Maturity Index (GMI) was created through exploratory applied research to address this gap. Inspired by the World Bank's GovTech Maturity Index (GTMI), the GMI is tailored specifically for the decentralized Web3 ecosystem. The GMI evaluates key dimensions of grant programs governance, transparency, operational efficiency, and community engagement, providing grant operators with a clear benchmark for assessing and improving their programs. The primary objectives of this research are to, first, identify the structural indicators that adequately describe Web3 grant programs. Second, to describe optimal outcomes for programs by evaluating their maturity across key operational areas. The GMI is applied to four major Ethereum Layer 2 grant programs, namely Arbitrum, Mantle, Taiko Labs, and Optimism. These case studies highlight areas where Web3 grant programs require improvement, particularly in standardizing processes, enhancing transparency, and increasing community participation.
- D. W. E. Allen, C. Berg, A. M. Lane, T. MacDonald, and J. Potts, “The Exchange Theory of Web3 Governance”, Sep. 05, 2022, Rochester, NY: 4209827. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4209827.
- C. Dener, H. Nii-Aponsah, L. E. Ghunney, and K. D. Johns, “GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation”, World Bank Publications, 2021. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1753-7.
- J. Albors and R. Barrera, “Impact of Public Funding on a Firm’s Innovation Performance: Analysis of Internal and External Moderating Factors”, Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 15, pp. 1297–1322, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1142/S136391961100374X.
- J. R. Bartle and R. L. Korosec, “A Review of State Procurement and Contracting”, J. Public Procure., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 192–214, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1108/JOPP-03-02-2003-B003.
- F. Monteiro and M. Correia, “Decentralised Autonomous Organisations for Public Procurement”, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, in EASE ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Jun. 2023, pp. 378–385, doi: 10.1145/3593434.3593519.
- V. Shermin, “Disrupting Governance with Blockchains and Smart Contracts”, Strateg. Change, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 499–509, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1002/jsc.2146.
- K. Gilbert, B. Tenni, and G. Lê, “Sustainable Transition From Donor Grant Financing: What Could It Look Like?”, Asia Pac. J. Public Health, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 485–498, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1010539519870656.
- [1] E. Leventhal, M. Waqar, A. Liu, B. Biedermann, F. Gibrel, H. Devjani, L. NaMu, M. Grendel, and V. Elefante, “State of Web3 Grants Report 2024”. 2024. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19305.51048.
- S. T. Howell, “Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants”, Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1136–1164, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1257/aer.20150808.
- E. S. Barry, J. Merkebu, and L. Varpio, “State-of-the-art Literature Review Methodology: A Six-Step Approach for Knowledge Synthesis”, vol. 11, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S40037-022-00725-9.
- A. Kucińska-Landwójtowicz, I. D. Czabak-Górska, P. Domingues, P. Sampaio, and C. Ferradaz de Carvalho, “Organizational Maturity Models: The Leading Research Fields and Opportunities for Further Studies”, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 60–83, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-12-2022-0360.
- E. Yatskovskaya, J. S. Srai, and M. Kumar, “Integrated Supply Network Maturity Model: Water Scarcity Perspective”, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10030896.
- NorthShore.ai Inc., “Web3 Grants. Highly Configurable, End-to-end Management Solution”, CharmVerse | The Network for Onchain Communities. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://charmverse.io/solutions/grants/.
- Arbitrum DAO, “Arbitrum Short-term Incentive Program”, Arbitrum DAO Proposal. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0x5e0057920df9a278918e4de4ee1-e6de7e2415d2af985e40a6c7a1a4b47a4ce01.
- BitDAO, “[PASSED] MIP-24: Mantle EcoFund”, Mantle Forum. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://forum.mantle.xyz/t/passed-mip-24-mantle-ecofund/4692.
- The Optimism Collective, “What is the Optimism Collective? Get a Grant”, Optimism Docs. Accessed: Aug. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://community.optimism.io/docs/governance/get-a-grant.html.
- Taiko Labs, “Announcing our First Community Grant Program”. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://taiko.mirror.xyz/G7dmuoR42S4D55vT8bs_lAxPZP63kAgRu2IfqkJdf6U.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.