Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A Test of Time: Predicting the Sustainable Success of Online Collaboration in Wikipedia

Published 24 Oct 2024 in cs.CY, cs.CL, and cs.SI | (2410.19150v2)

Abstract: The Internet has significantly expanded the potential for global collaboration, allowing millions of users to contribute to collective projects like Wikipedia. While prior work has assessed the success of online collaborations, most approaches are time-agnostic, evaluating success without considering its longevity. Research on the factors that ensure the long-term preservation of high-quality standards in online collaboration is scarce. In this study, we address this gap. We propose a novel metric, `Sustainable Success,' which measures the ability of collaborative efforts to maintain their quality over time. Using Wikipedia as a case study, we introduce the SustainPedia dataset, which compiles data from over 40K Wikipedia articles, including each article's sustainable success label and more than 300 explanatory features such as edit history, user experience, and team composition. Using this dataset, we develop machine learning models to predict the sustainable success of Wikipedia articles. Our best-performing model achieves a high AU-ROC score of 0.88 on average. Our analysis reveals important insights. For example, we find that the longer an article takes to be recognized as high-quality, the more likely it is to maintain that status over time (i.e., be sustainable). Additionally, user experience emerged as the most critical predictor of sustainability. Our analysis provides insights into broader collective actions beyond Wikipedia (e.g., online activism, crowdsourced open-source software), where the same social dynamics that drive success on Wikipedia might play a role. We make all data and code used for this study publicly available for further research.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (82)
  1. Ofer Arazy and Oded Nov. 2010. Determinants of wikipedia quality: the roles of global and local contribution inequality. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 233–236.
  2. Don’t lose the message while paraphrasing: A study on content preserving style transfer. In International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems. Springer, 47–61.
  3. Elias Bassani and Marco Viviani. 2019. Automatically assessing the quality of Wikipedia contents. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. 804–807.
  4. Network analysis of collaboration structure in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 731–740.
  5. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45 (2001), 5–32.
  6. Frederick P Brooks Jr. 1995. The mythical man-month: essays on software engineering. Pearson Education.
  7. Russell W Coff. 1997. Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of management review 22, 2 (1997), 374–402.
  8. Are all successful communities alike? Characterizing and predicting the success of online communities. In The world wide web conference. 318–328.
  9. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 1277–1286.
  10. A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Hinrich Schuetze, Pascale Fung, and Massimo Poesio (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 250–259. https://aclanthology.org/P13-1025
  11. Quality control in crowdsourcing: A survey of quality attributes, assessment techniques, and assurance actions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 1 (2018), 1–40.
  12. Quality change: Norm or exception? Measurement, analysis and detection of quality change in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1 (2022), 1–36.
  13. Language-Agnostic Modeling of Wikipedia Articles for Content Quality Assessment across Languages. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 18. 1924–1934.
  14. Measuring article quality in Wikipedia using the collaboration network. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015. 464–471.
  15. CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11363 (2018).
  16. Wiki: web collaboration. springer science & business media.
  17. Jerome H Friedman. 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 38, 4 (2002), 367–378.
  18. Corrado Gini. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità: contributo allo studio delle distribuzioni e delle relazioni statistiche.[Fasc. I.]. Tipogr. di P. Cuppini.
  19. Robert Godwin-Jones. 2003. Blogs and wikis: Environments for online collaboration. (2003).
  20. NwQM: A neural quality assessment framework for Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 8396–8406.
  21. More than a feeling: Accuracy and application of sentiment analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 40, 1 (2023), 75–87.
  22. David Hinds and Ronald M Lee. 2008. Social network structure as a critical success condition for virtual communities. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008). IEEE, 323–323.
  23. Courtenay Honey and Susan C Herring. 2009. Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Ieee, 1–10.
  24. Measuring article quality in wikipedia: models and evaluation. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management. 243–252.
  25. Abraham Israeli and Oren Tsur. 2024. With Flying Colors: Predicting Community Success in Large-scale Collaborative Campaigns. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 18. 691–703.
  26. David Jurgens and Tsai-Ching Lu. 2012. Temporal motifs reveal the dynamics of editor interactions in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 6. 162–169.
  27. Do editors or articles drive collaboration?: multilevel statistical network analysis of wikipedia coauthorship. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 427–436.
  28. Aniket Kittur and Robert E Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 37–46.
  29. Entrepreneurial team formation. Academy of Management Annals 14, 1 (2020), 29–59.
  30. Thomas Lechler. 2001. Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics 16 (2001), 263–278.
  31. Jürgen Lerner and Alessandro Lomi. 2019. The network structure of successful collaboration in Wikipedia. (2019).
  32. Coding together at scale: GitHub as a collaborative social network. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 8. 295–304.
  33. Jun Liu and Sudha Ram. 2011. Who does what: Collaboration patterns in the Wikipedia and their impact on article quality. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 2, 2 (2011), 1–23.
  34. Paradetox: Detoxification with parallel data. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 6804–6818.
  35. Scott M Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4765–4774.
  36. Why it works (when it works) success factors in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 1–10.
  37. Roles and success in wikipedia talk pages: Identifying latent patterns of behavior. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 1026–1035.
  38. Characterizing the Evolution of Communities on Reddit. In International Conference on Social Media and Society. 58–64.
  39. Pedro Miguel Moás and Carla Teixeira Lopes. 2023. Automatic Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles—A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Surveys 56, 4 (2023), 1–37.
  40. Janine Nahapiet and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review 23, 2 (1998).
  41. openZIM. 2024. Wikipedia 1.0 Engine. https://wp1.openzim.org/#/compare/
  42. On the inequality of contributions to Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008). IEEE, 304–304.
  43. Elinor Ostrom. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
  44. The Effects of Group Size and Time on the Formation of Online Communities: Evidence From Reddit. Social Media+ Society 4, 4 (2018), 2056305118815908.
  45. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of machine learning research 12, Oct (2011), 2825–2830.
  46. Jiaxin Pei and David Jurgens. 2021. Measuring sentence-level and aspect-level (un) certainty in science communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14776 (2021).
  47. On the Value of Wikipedia as a Gateway to the Web. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 249–260.
  48. Edward Platt and Daniel Romero. 2018. Network structure, efficiency, and performance in WikiProjects. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 12.
  49. The influence of network structures of Wikipedia discussion pages on the efficiency of WikiProjects. Social Networks 43 (2015), 1–15.
  50. Hoda Sepehri Rad and Denilson Barbosa. 2012. Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the eighth annual international symposium on wikis and open collaboration. 1–10.
  51. Classifying Wikipedia article quality with revision history networks. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 1–7.
  52. Sam Ransbotham and Gerald C Kane. 2011. Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. Mis Quarterly (2011), 613–627.
  53. How did they build the free encyclopedia? a literature review of collaboration and coordination among wikipedia editors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 31, 1 (2023).
  54. Coordination and efficiency in decentralized collaboration. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 9. 367–376.
  55. Social networks under stress. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 9–20.
  56. Protection from Evil and Good: The Differential Effects of Page Protection on Wikipedia Article Quality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12696 (2023).
  57. Relating Wikipedia article quality to edit behavior and link structure. Applied Network Science 5 (2020), 1–20.
  58. Analyzing the productivity of GitHub teams based on formation phase activity. In 2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT). IEEE, 169–176.
  59. The evolution of cooperation. The Quarterly review of biology 79, 2 (2004), 135–160.
  60. Juho Salminen. 2012. Collective intelligence in humans: A literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.3401 (2012).
  61. A hybrid model for quality assessment of Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2017. 43–52.
  62. A joint model for multimodal document quality assessment. In 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). IEEE, 107–110.
  63. Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Amitai Armon. 2022. Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need. Information Fusion 81 (2022), 84–90.
  64. similarweb. 2024. Similar Web Top Websites. https://www.similarweb.com/top-websites/
  65. Greg Stoddard. 2015. Popularity Dynamics and Intrinsic Quality in Reddit and Hacker News.. In ICWSM. 416–425.
  66. Information quality discussions in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on knowledge management. World Scientific Hackensack, NJ, 101–113.
  67. Chenhao Tan. 2018. Tracing community genealogy: how new communities emerge from the old. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 12.
  68. Network structure of social coding in github. In 2013 17th European conference on software maintenance and reengineering. IEEE, 323–326.
  69. An empirical study on developer interactions in stackoverflow. In Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on applied computing. 1019–1024.
  70. Zijian Wang and David Jurgens. 2018. It’s going to be okay: Measuring Access to Support in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Ellen Riloff, David Chiang, Julia Hockenmaier, and Jun’ichi Tsujii (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1004
  71. Tell me more: an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration. 1–10.
  72. An exploration of discussion threads in social news sites: A case study of the reddit community. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on. IEEE, 579–583.
  73. Wikimedia. 2024. Wikimedia Downloads. https://dumps.wikimedia.org/
  74. Wikipeida. 2024a. Category:Delisted good articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Delisted_good_articles
  75. Wikipeida. 2024b. Wikipedia:Featured article review. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review
  76. Wikipeida. 2024c. Wikipedia:Featured articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles
  77. Wikipeida. 2024d. Wikipedia:Former featured articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Former_featured_articles
  78. Wikipeida. 2024e. Wikipedia:Good articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles
  79. Wikipeida. 2024f. Wikipedia:Proposed article demotion. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Proposed_article_demotion
  80. Wikipeida. 2024g. Wikipedia:WikiProject. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject
  81. Adam M Wilson and Gene E Likens. 2015. Content volatility of scientific topics in Wikipedia: a cautionary tale. PloS one 10, 8 (2015), e0134454.
  82. Crowd development: The interplay between crowd evaluation and collaborative dynamics in wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1–21.

Summary

  • The paper introduces the 'Sustainable Success' metric to evaluate long-term quality in Wikipedia articles.
  • It leverages the SustainPedia dataset with 40K articles and 300 features, achieving an AU-ROC score of 0.88 using machine learning.
  • The findings highlight that quicker promotion to high-quality status and experienced contributors are key to enduring collaborative success.

Predicting Sustainable Success in Wikipedia Collaborations

The research article titled "A Test of Time: Predicting the Sustainable Success of Online Collaboration in Wikipedia" presents an investigation into the long-term viability of online collaborative efforts, with Wikipedia serving as a primary case study. This work introduces a novel approach to evaluating success, focusing on the dimension of sustainability, a factor that has often been overlooked in previous studies.

Sustainable Success Metric

The authors propose the concept of "Sustainable Success," emphasizing the ability of online collaborations to maintain high-quality standards over time. This is crucial for platforms like Wikipedia, where content quality is bound to fluctuate as articles evolve. The establishment of the SustainPedia dataset, which includes data from over 40,000 Wikipedia articles along with more than 300 explanatory features, is a foundational achievement of this research. These features encompass aspects of edit history, user experience, and team composition.

Methodology and Results

Utilizing machine learning models, the study aims to predict whether a Wikipedia article will uphold its high-quality status or succumb to demotion after its initial promotion. The researchers' most successful model achieves an AU-ROC score of 0.88, highlighting substantial predictive accuracy. Key findings indicate that the time it takes for an article to reach high-quality status is inversely correlated with the likelihood of maintaining that status. Further, the experience of the contributors emerges as a pivotal predictor, underscoring the importance of intellectual capital in collaborative success.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research extend beyond Wikipedia. The insights gleaned could influence other areas of collective action, such as online activism and open-source software development, where similar social dynamics prevail. Recognizing the factors that contribute to sustained collaborative success can guide the development of more robust online platforms.

Future research could benefit from testing the sustainable success metric in broader collaborative settings, potentially enriching the understanding of social and collaborative dynamics in different contexts. Moreover, expanding the study to include non-English Wikipedia versions could provide a cross-cultural perspective on collaboration sustainability.

Conclusion

By focusing on the concept of Sustainable Success, this study provides a novel metric for evaluating the longevity of high-quality collaborative outcomes. The introduction of the SustainPedia dataset and the subsequent predictive modeling represent significant contributions to understanding persistent success in online collaborations. This work not only enriches the literature on computational social science but also promises practical applications in the governance and development of collaborative platforms.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 9 likes about this paper.