Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

High-dimensional Analysis of Knowledge Distillation: Weak-to-Strong Generalization and Scaling Laws

Published 24 Oct 2024 in stat.ML and cs.LG | (2410.18837v2)

Abstract: A growing number of machine learning scenarios rely on knowledge distillation where one uses the output of a surrogate model as labels to supervise the training of a target model. In this work, we provide a sharp characterization of this process for ridgeless, high-dimensional regression, under two settings: (i) model shift, where the surrogate model is arbitrary, and (ii) distribution shift, where the surrogate model is the solution of empirical risk minimization with out-of-distribution data. In both cases, we characterize the precise risk of the target model through non-asymptotic bounds in terms of sample size and data distribution under mild conditions. As a consequence, we identify the form of the optimal surrogate model, which reveals the benefits and limitations of discarding weak features in a data-dependent fashion. In the context of weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization, this has the interpretation that (i) W2S training, with the surrogate as the weak model, can provably outperform training with strong labels under the same data budget, but (ii) it is unable to improve the data scaling law. We validate our results on numerical experiments both on ridgeless regression and on neural network architectures.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. Phi-3 technical report: A highly capable language model locally on your phone, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14219.
  2. Explaining neural scaling laws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(27):e2311878121, 2024.
  3. Benign overfitting in linear regression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48):30063–30070, 2020.
  4. Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(32):15849–15854, 2019.
  5. A dynamical model of neural scaling laws, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01092.
  6. How feature learning can improve neural scaling laws, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17858.
  7. Weak-to-strong generalization: Eliciting strong capabilities with weak supervision, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09390.
  8. Provable benefits of overparameterization in model compression: From double descent to pruning neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pp.  6974–6983, 2021.
  9. Quantifying the gain in weak-to-strong generalization, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15116.
  10. Dimension free ridge regression, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08571.
  11. Generalization error rates in kernel regression: the crossover from the noiseless to noisy regime. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2022(11):114004, 2022.
  12. Data filtering networks, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.17425.
  13. Self-training converts weak learners to strong learners in mixture models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  8003–8021. PMLR, 2022.
  14. Textbooks are all you need, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11644.
  15. The distribution of ridgeless least squares interpolators, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02044.
  16. Surprises in high-dimensional ridgeless least squares interpolation, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08560.
  17. Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385.
  18. Deep learning scaling is predictable, empirically, 2017. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00409.
  19. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02531.
  20. Scaling laws for learning with real and surrogate data, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04376.
  21. Scaling laws for neural language models, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361.
  22. Towards a statistical theory of data selection under weak supervision, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14563.
  23. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Technical Report 0, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 2009. URL https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/learning-features-2009-TR.pdf.
  24. Theoretical analysis of weak-to-strong generalization, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16043.
  25. Scaling laws in linear regression: Compute, parameters, and data, 2024a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08466.
  26. Rho-1: Not all tokens are what you need, 2024b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07965.
  27. Minimum-norm interpolation under covariate shift, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00522.
  28. A solvable model of neural scaling laws, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16859.
  29. Self-distillation amplifies regularization in hilbert space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3351–3361, 2020.
  30. The generalization error of max-margin linear classifiers: Benign overfitting and high dimensional asymptotics in the overparametrized regime, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01544.
  31. On student-teacher deviations in distillation: does it pay to disobey? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:5961–6000, 2023.
  32. A theoretical characterization of semi-supervised learning with self-training for gaussian mixture models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  3601–3609. PMLR, 2021.
  33. 4+3 phases of compute-optimal neural scaling laws, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15074.
  34. Optimal ridge regularization for out-of-distribution prediction, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01233.
  35. Asymptotics of ridge (less) regression under general source condition. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  3889–3897. PMLR, 2021.
  36. The smallest singular value of a random rectangular matrix, 2009. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.3956.
  37. The eigenlearning framework: A conservation law perspective on kernel ridge regression and wide neural networks. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023.
  38. More is better in modern machine learning: when infinite overparameterization is optimal and overfitting is obligatory, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14646.
  39. Generalization error of min-norm interpolators in transfer learning, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13944.
  40. Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:19523–19536, 2022.
  41. Asymptotic learning curves of kernel methods: empirical data versus teacher–student paradigm. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2020(12):124001, 2020.
  42. Regularized linear regression: A precise analysis of the estimation error. In Conference on Learning Theory, pp.  1683–1709. PMLR, 2015.
  43. A. Tsigler and P. L. Bartlett. Benign overfitting in ridge regression, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14286.
  44. Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  13484–13508, 2023.
  45. More than a toy: Random matrix models predict how real-world neural representations generalize, 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06176.
  46. Theoretical analysis of self-training with deep networks on unlabeled data, 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03622.
  47. Denny Wu and Ji Xu. On the optimal weighted ℓ⁢_⁢2ℓ_2\ell\_2roman_ℓ _ 2 regularization in overparameterized linear regression. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:10112–10123, 2020.
  48. Precise high-dimensional asymptotics for quantifying heterogeneous transfers, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11750.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that weak surrogate models can outperform strong labels by achieving robust generalization under limited data.
  • It derives rigorous non-asymptotic risk bounds for both arbitrary surrogate and ERM-based models in model and distribution shift scenarios.
  • The findings indicate that optimal surrogate selection preserves scaling law exponents while reducing overall risk, enhancing distillation pipelines.

High-dimensional Analysis of Knowledge Distillation: Weak-to-Strong Generalization and Scaling Laws

The paper presents a detailed examination of knowledge distillation by analyzing the statistical properties of high-dimensional ridgeless regression under model and distribution shifts. The research focuses on two settings: model shift, involving arbitrary surrogate models, and distribution shift, where surrogate models result from empirical risk minimization (ERM) with out-of-distribution data. This work achieves a precise risk characterization of the target model using non-asymptotic bounds linked to sample size and data distribution, highlighting the optimal surrogate model form and the implications for knowledge distillation.

Technical Summary

The paper investigates scenarios where knowledge distillation is applied, providing a rigorous statistical understanding of its effectiveness. The settings analyzed include:

  1. Model Shift: Here, the surrogate model is arbitrary. The researchers derive non-asymptotic risk bounds to characterize this scenario.
  2. Distribution Shift: The surrogate model arises from ERM with out-of-distribution data. The paper explores how the two stages of distillation influence the generalization performance of the target model.

Key to this analysis is the high-dimensional regime where sample sizes and feature dimensions are proportional. The authors offer thorough theoretical guarantees, centered on the effective performance of the surrogate-to-target learning process. Specifically, the study highlights the concept of weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization, which suggests that using a surrogate model as a weak form can outperform strong labels under the same data budget. This underscores the potential of a carefully curated surrogate model to enhance learning efficiency.

Strong Numerical Results and Claims

The study identifies that in certain conditions, especially under a power-law decay covariance structure, the surrogate model's risk does not alter the scaling law's exponent, though it can achieve a lower overall risk compared to using true labels. This finding implies the surrogate can enhance performance without modifying fundamental learning curve behaviors.

Implications and Future Directions

The research implications of this study are far-reaching, both practically and theoretically:

  • Practical Implications: The insights into optimal surrogate model selection can guide practitioners in designing better knowledge distillation pipelines, especially in settings with large, high-dimensional datasets.
  • Theoretical Insights: The work extends the understanding of benign overfitting and double descent phenomena, reflecting on foundational statistical learning principles.
  • Future Directions: Potential research extensions include exploring the cascading effects of multi-stage distillation processes and refining data selection criteria within distillation frameworks.

In the field of AI developments, the implications suggest an evolution in handling large-scale data efficiently, paving the way for more robust deep learning models trained via distillation techniques. The detailed exploration of covariance and model behaviors enriches the discourse on scaling laws and presents a refined theoretical model that others can build upon. Such advancements are promising for future AI applications demanding efficient model training with limited or imperfect data labels.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 158 likes about this paper.