Markov Potential Game with Final-time Reach-Avoid Objectives
Abstract: We formulate a Markov potential game with final-time reach-avoid objectives by integrating potential game theory with stochastic reach-avoid control. Our focus is on multi-player trajectory planning where players maximize the same multi-player reach-avoid objective: the probability of all participants reaching their designated target states by a specified time, while avoiding collisions with one another. Existing approaches require centralized computation of actions via a global policy, which may have prohibitively expensive communication costs. Instead, we focus on approximations of the global policy via local state feedback policies. First, we adapt the recursive single player reach-avoid value iteration to the multi-player framework with local policies, and show that the same recursion holds on the joint state space. To find each player's optimal local policy, the multi-player reach-avoid value function is projected from the joint state to the local state using the other players' occupancy measures. Then, we propose an iterative best response scheme for the multi-player value iteration to converge to a pure Nash equilibrium. We demonstrate the utility of our approach in finding collision-free policies for multi-player motion planning in simulation.
- L. A. Garrow, B. German, N. T. Schwab, M. D. Patterson, N. Mendonca, Y. O. Gawdiak, and J. R. Murphy, “A proposed taxonomy for advanced air mobility,” in AIAA Aviation 2022 Forum, 2022, p. 3321.
- R. Goyal, C. Reiche, C. Fernando, and A. Cohen, “Advanced air mobility: Demand analysis and market potential of the airport shuttle and air taxi markets,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7421, 2021.
- R. E. Weibel and R. J. Hansman, “Safety considerations for operation of unmanned aerial vehicles in the national airspace system,” Tech. Rep., 2006.
- R. Shone, K. Glazebrook, and K. G. Zografos, “Applications of stochastic modeling in air traffic management: Methods, challenges and opportunities for solving air traffic problems under uncertainty,” Euro. J. Oper. Res., pp. 1–26, 2021.
- D. Hentzen, M. Kamgarpour, M. Soler, and D. González-Arribas, “On maximizing safety in stochastic aircraft trajectory planning with uncertain thunderstorm development,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 79, pp. 543–553, 2018.
- D. Calderone and S. Sastry, “Markov decision process routing games,” in Int’l Conf. Cyber-Phys. Syst., 2017, pp. 273–279.
- A. P. Vinod, S. Yamazaki, A. Chakrabarty, N. Yoshikawa, and S. Di Cairano, “Aircraft approach management using reachability and dynamic programming,” in 2024 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 318–324.
- A. Abate, M. Prandini, J. Lygeros, and S. Sastry, “Probabilistic reachability and safety for controlled discrete time stochastic hybrid systems,” Automatica, 2008.
- S. Summers and J. Lygeros, “Verification of discrete time stochastic hybrid systems: A stochastic reach-avoid decision problem,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1951–1961, 2010.
- A. Vinod and M. Oishi, “Stochastic reachability of a target tube: Theory and computation,” Automatica, 2021.
- N. Schmid, M. Fochesato, S. H. Li, T. Sutter, and J. Lygeros, “Computing optimal joint chance constrained control policies,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10495, 2023.
- M. Chen, Z. Zhou, and C. J. Tomlin, “Multiplayer reach-avoid games via pairwise outcomes,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1451–1457, 2016.
- J. F. Fisac and S. S. Sastry, “The pursuit-evasion-defense differential game in dynamic constrained environments,” in 2015 54th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC). IEEE, 2015, pp. 4549–4556.
- M. Chen, Q. Hu, C. Mackin, J. F. Fisac, and C. J. Tomlin, “Safe platooning of unmanned aerial vehicles via reachability,” in 2015 54th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC). IEEE, 2015, pp. 4695–4701.
- K. Margellos and J. Lygeros, “Hamilton–jacobi formulation for reach–avoid differential games,” IEEE Transactions on automatic control, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1849–1861, 2011.
- J. F. Fisac, E. Bronstein, E. Stefansson, D. Sadigh, S. S. Sastry, and A. D. Dragan, “Hierarchical game-theoretic planning for autonomous vehicles,” in 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2019, pp. 9590–9596.
- M. J. Smith, “The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria,” Transp. Res. Part B: Method., pp. 295–304, 1979.
- S. H. Li, D. Calderone, and B. Açıkmeşe, “Congestion-aware path coordination game with markov decision process dynamics,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 431–436, 2022.
- D. Monderer and L. S. Shapley, “Potential games,” Games and economic behavior, 1996.
- S. H. Li, Y. Yu, N. I. Miguel, D. Calderone, L. J. Ratliff, and B. Açıkmeşe, “Adaptive constraint satisfaction for markov decision process congestion games: Application to transportation networks,” Automatica, vol. 151, p. 110879, 2023.
- J. R. Marden, “State based potential games,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3075–3088, 2012.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.