Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Polar Neptunes are Stable to Tides

Published 5 Sep 2024 in astro-ph.EP | (2409.03679v2)

Abstract: There is an intriguing and growing population of Neptune-sized planets with stellar obliquities near ∼90<sup>∘\sim90<sup>{\circ}. One previously proposed formation pathway is a disk-driven resonance, which can take place at the end stages of planet formation in a system containing an inner Neptune, outer cold Jupiter, and protoplanetary disk. This mechanism occurs within the first ∼10\sim10 Myr, but most of the polar Neptunes we see today are ∼\simGyrs old. Up until now, there has not been an extensive analysis of whether the polar orbits are stable over ∼\simGyr timescales. Tidal realignment mechanisms are known to operate in other systems, and if they are active here, this would cause theoretical tension with a primordial misalignment story. In this paper, we explore the effects of tidal evolution on the disk-driven resonance theory. We use both NN-body and secular simulations to study tidal effects on both the initial resonant encounter and long-term evolution. We find that the polar orbits are remarkably stable on ∼\simGyr timescales. Inclination damping does not occur for the polar cases, although we do identify sub-polar cases where it is important. We consider two case study polar Neptunes, WASP-107 b and HAT-P-11 b, and study them in the context of this theory, finding consistency with present-day properties if their tidal quality factors are Q≳10<sup>4Q \gtrsim 10<sup>4 and Q≳10<sup>5Q \gtrsim 10<sup>5, respectively.

Authors (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.