Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Galaxy assembly bias in the stellar-to-halo mass relation for red central galaxies from SDSS

Published 4 Sep 2024 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO | (2409.03004v2)

Abstract: We report evidence of galaxy assembly bias - the correlation between galaxy properties and biased secondary halo properties at fixed halo mass (M$H$) - in the stellar-to-halo mass relation (SHMR) for red central galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In the M$_H = 10{11.5}-10{13.5} h{-1}$ M${\odot}$ range, central galaxy stellar mass (M$*$) is correlated with the number density of galaxies within $10 h{-1}$ Mpc ($\delta{10}$), a common proxy for halo formation time. This galaxy assembly bias signal is also present when M$H$, M$$, and $\delta_{10}$ are substituted with group luminosity, galaxy luminosity, and metrics of the large-scale density field. To associate differences in $\delta_{10}$ with variations in halo formation time, we fitted a model that accounts for (1) errors in the M$H$ measured by the Tinker 2021, 2022 group catalog and (2) the level of correlation between halo formation time and M$$ at fixed M$H$. Fitting of this model yields that (1) errors in M$_H$ are 0.15 dex and (2) halo formation time and M$$ are strongly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ~0.85). At fixed M$H$, variations of ~0.4 dex in M$$ are associated with ~1-3 Gyr variations in halo formation time and in galaxy formation time (from stellar population fitting; Oyarz\'un et al. 2022). These results are indicative that halo properties other than M$_H$ can impact central galaxy assembly.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.