Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Query complexity lower bounds for local list-decoding and hard-core predicates (even for small rate and huge lists) (2409.01708v1)

Published 3 Sep 2024 in cs.CC

Abstract: A binary code Enc$:{0,1}k \to {0,1}n$ is $(0.5-\epsilon,L)$-list decodable if for all $w \in {0,1}n$, the set List$(w)$ of all messages $m \in {0,1}k$ such that the relative Hamming distance between Enc$(m)$ and $w$ is at most $0.5 -\epsilon$, has size at most $L$. Informally, a $q$-query local list-decoder for Enc is a randomized procedure Dec$:[k]\times [L] \to {0,1}$ that when given oracle access to a string $w$, makes at most $q$ oracle calls, and for every message $m \in \text{List}(w)$, with high probability, there exists $j \in [L]$ such that for every $i \in [k]$, with high probability, Dec$w(i,j)=m_i$. We prove lower bounds on $q$, that apply even if $L$ is huge (say $L=2{k{0.9}}$) and the rate of Enc is small (meaning that $n \ge 2{k}$): 1. For $\epsilon \geq 1/k{\nu}$ for some universal constant $0< \nu < 1$, we prove a lower bound of $q=\Omega(\frac{\log(1/\delta)}{\epsilon2})$, where $\delta$ is the error probability of the local list-decoder. This bound is tight as there is a matching upper bound by Goldreich and Levin (STOC 1989) of $q=O(\frac{\log(1/\delta)}{\epsilon2})$ for the Hadamard code (which has $n=2k$). This bound extends an earlier work of Grinberg, Shaltiel and Viola (FOCS 2018) which only works if $n \le 2{k{\gamma}}$ for some universal constant $0<\gamma <1$, and the number of coins tossed by Dec is small (and therefore does not apply to the Hadamard code, or other codes with low rate). 2. For smaller $\epsilon$, we prove a lower bound of roughly $q = \Omega(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon}})$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first lower bound on the number of queries of local list-decoders that gives $q \ge k$ for small $\epsilon$. We also prove black-box limitations for improving some of the parameters of the Goldreich-Levin hard-core predicate construction.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube