A deep learning-based surrogate model for seismic data assimilation in fault activation modeling
Abstract: Assessing the safety and environmental impacts of subsurface resource exploitation and management is critical and requires robust geomechanical modeling. However, uncertainties stemming from model assumptions, intrinsic variability of governing parameters, and data errors challenge the reliability of predictions. In the absence of direct measurements, inverse modeling and stochastic data assimilation methods can offer reliable solutions, but in complex and large-scale settings, the computational expense can become prohibitive. To address these challenges, this paper presents a deep learning-based surrogate model (SurMoDeL) designed for seismic data assimilation in fault activation modeling. The surrogate model leverages neural networks to provide simplified yet accurate representations of complex geophysical systems, enabling faster simulations and analyses essential for uncertainty quantification. The work proposes two different methods to integrate an understanding of fault behavior into the model, thereby enhancing the accuracy of its predictions. The application of the proxy model to integrate seismic data through effective data assimilation techniques efficiently constrains the uncertain parameters, thus bridging the gap between theoretical models and real-world observations.
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112736
- Bottazzi F, Della Rossa E. A Functional Data Analysis Approach to Surrogate Modeling in Reservoir and Geomechanics Uncertainty Quantification. Mathematical Geosciences. 2017;49:517–540. doi: 10.1007/s11004-017-9685-y
- doi: 10.3390/a13070156
- doi: 10.1007/s10596-021-10062-1
- doi: 10.1007/s00477-022-02237-8
- Uncertainty Quantification and Inverse Modeling of Fault Poromechanics and Induced Seismicity: Application to a Synthetic Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Problem. All Days of U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium; 2016.
- doi: 10.1007/s10596-019-9815-3
- Verde A. Global Sensitivity Analysis of Geomechanical Fractured Reservoir Parameters. 49th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association. 2015.
- doi: 10.1007/s10596-019-09896-7
- Cited by: 9doi: 10.1007/s10596-020-09935-8
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.04.023
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.001
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103794
- doi: 10.2118/118963-PA
- Emerick AA, Reynolds AC. History matching time-lapse seismic data using the ensemble Kalman filter with multiple data assimilations. Computational Geosciences. 2012;16(3):639-659. doi: 10.1007/s10596-012-9275-5
- History-Matching Production and Seismic Data in a Real Field Case Using the Ensemble Smoother With Multiple Data Assimilation. All Days of SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference; 2013
- Luo X JMNG. Efficient big data assimilation through sparse representation: A 3D benchmark case study in petroleum engineering.. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198586
- 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-12doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.377
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110460
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.023
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103873
- Kikuchi N, Oden JT. Contact Problems in Elasticity: A Study of Variational Inequalities and Finite Element Methods. Philadelphia, PA, USA: SIAM, 1988
- Laursen TA. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics: Fundamentals of Modeling Interfacial Phenomena in Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2003
- Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2nd ed., 2006
- Simo JC, Hughes TJR. Computational Inelasticity. Springer-Verlag New York, 1998
- Bertsekas DP. Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods. Academic Press New York, 1984.
- doi: 10.1002/nme.2069
- doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.03.032
- doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113161
- doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.114632
- doi: 10.1680/geot.11.P.149
- doi: 10.1002/2015JB012090
- doi: 10.1016/j.gete.2017.12.002
- Kanamori H, Anderson D. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.. 1975;65:1073-1095.
- doi: 10.1063/1.1699114
- Hastings WK. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications. Biometrika. 1970;57(1):97–109.
- Chen P. Full-Wave Seismic Data Assimilation: Theoretical Background and Recent Advances. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2011;168(10):1527-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00024-010-0240-8
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124798
- doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.01.008
- Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.