Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Automated Knowledge Graph Learning in Industrial Processes (2407.02106v1)

Published 2 Jul 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Industrial processes generate vast amounts of time series data, yet extracting meaningful relationships and insights remains challenging. This paper introduces a framework for automated knowledge graph learning from time series data, specifically tailored for industrial applications. Our framework addresses the complexities inherent in industrial datasets, transforming them into knowledge graphs that improve decision-making, process optimization, and knowledge discovery. Additionally, it employs Granger causality to identify key attributes that can inform the design of predictive models. To illustrate the practical utility of our approach, we also present a motivating use case demonstrating the benefits of our framework in a real-world industrial scenario. Further, we demonstrate how the automated conversion of time series data into knowledge graphs can identify causal influences or dependencies between important process parameters.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Automated process knowledge graph construction from bpmn models. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 32–47. Springer, 2022.
  2. Knowledge graph supported machine parameterization for the injection moulding industry. In Iberoamerican Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web Conference, pages 106–120. Springer, 2022.
  3. A knowledge graph for industry 4.0. In The Semantic Web: 17th International Conference, ESWC 2020, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 31–June 4, 2020, Proceedings 17, pages 465–480. Springer, 2020.
  4. M. T. Bahadori and Y. Liu. Granger causality analysis in irregular time series. In Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pages 660–671. SIAM, 2012.
  5. Generating digital twin models using knowledge graphs for industrial production lines. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, pages 425–430, 2017.
  6. Knowledge graphs in manufacturing and production: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9:55537–55554, 2021.
  7. Knowledge graphs for an automated information provision in the factory planning. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pages 1074–1078. IEEE, 2019.
  8. Leveraging knowledge graph embedding techniques for industry 4.0 use cases. In Cyber Defence in Industry 4.0 Systems and Related Logistics and IT Infrastructures, pages 10–26. IOS Press, 2018.
  9. Seamless integration of cyber-physical systems in knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 2000–2003, 2018.
  10. C. W. J. Granger. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3):424–438, 1969. Publisher: [Wiley, Econometric Society].
  11. Teaming. ai: enabling human-ai teaming intelligence in manufacturing. Proceedings http://ceur-ws. org ISSN, 1613:0073, 2022.
  12. A knowledge graph-based data representation approach for iiot-enabled cognitive manufacturing. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51:101515, 2022.
  13. H. Lütkepohl. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. New York : Springer, Berlin, 2005. OCLC: ocm61028971.
  14. Root cause analysis in the industrial domain using knowledge graphs: a case study on power transformers. Procedia Computer Science, 200:944–953, 2022.
  15. Building a knowledge graph with inference for a production machine using the web of things standard. In Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice: 34th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2021, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 26–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 34, pages 240–251. Springer, 2021.
  16. Industry-scale knowledge graphs: lessons and challenges. Commun. ACM, 62(8):36–43, 2019.
  17. S. Panat and K. K. Varanasi. Electrostatic dust removal using adsorbed moisture–assisted charge induction for sustainable operation of solar panels. Science Advances, 8(10):eabm0078, Mar. 2022.
  18. Granger causality for time-series anomaly detection. In 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on data mining, pages 1074–1079. IEEE, 2012.
  19. Unveiling relations in the industry 4.0 standards landscape based on knowledge graph embeddings. In Database and Expert Systems Applications: 31st International Conference, DEXA 2020, Bratislava, Slovakia, September 14–17, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 31, pages 179–194. Springer, 2020.
  20. Xai-kg: knowledge graph to support xai and decision-making in manufacturing. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops: CAiSE 2021 International Workshops, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, June 28–July 2, 2021, Proceedings, pages 167–172. Springer, 2021.
  21. A. Shojaie and E. B. Fox. Granger causality: A review and recent advances. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9:289–319, 2022.
  22. Electrostatic Charges of Abrasive Powders: The Role of Particle Size and Humidity. Coatings, 11(12):1520, Dec. 2021. Number: 12 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  23. J. Vanamu and A. Sahoo. An overview on dry powder coating in advancement to electrostatic dry powder coating used in pharmaceutical industry. Powder Technology, 399:117214, Feb. 2022.
  24. Coating of paper with highly filled powders. Powder Technology, 294:185–190, June 2016.
  25. Knowime: a system to construct a knowledge graph for intelligent manufacturing equipment. Ieee Access, 8:41805–41813, 2020.
  26. Mmkg: an approach to generate metallic materials knowledge graph based on dbpedia and wikipedia. Computer Physics Communications, 211:98–112, 2017.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.