Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Parity Detectors: a qubit based particle detection scheme with meV thresholds for rare-event searches

Published 27 May 2024 in physics.ins-det, astro-ph.IM, hep-ex, and quant-ph | (2405.17192v2)

Abstract: The next generation of rare-event searches, such as those aimed at determining the nature of particle dark matter or in measuring fundamental neutrino properties, will benefit from particle detectors with thresholds at the meV scale, 100-1000x lower than currently available. Quantum parity detectors (QPDs) are a novel class of proposed quantum devices that use the tremendous sensitivity of superconducting qubits to quasiparticle tunneling events as their detection concept. As envisioned, phonons generated by particle interactions within a crystalline substrate cause an eventual quasiparticle cascade within a surface patterned superconducting qubit element. This process alters the fundamental charge parity of the device in a binary manner, which can be used to deduce the initial properties of the energy deposition. We lay out the operating mechanism, noise sources, and expected sensitivity of QPDs based on a spectrum of charge-qubit types and readout mechanisms and detail an R&D pathway to demonstrating sensitivity to sub-eV energy deposits.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. M. Battaglieri et al., arXiv:1707.04591 [hep-ph]  (2017), and references therein.
  2. D. K. Papoulias, T. S. Kosmas, and Y. Kuno, Frontiers in Physics 7, 191 (2019).
  3. R. Romani, Correlated and uncorrelated backgrounds and noise sources in athermal phonon detectors and other low temperature detector (2023).
  4. Y. Nakamura, Y. A. Pashkin, and J. Tsai, nature 398, 786 (1999).
  5. J. M. Martinis, npj Quantum Information 7, 90 (2021).
  6. G. Catelani, Physical Review B 89, 094522 (2014).
  7. A. Shnirman, G. Schön, and Z. Hermon, Physical Review Letters 79, 2371 (1997).
  8. N. Booth, Applied physics letters 50, 293 (1987).
  9. M. C. Pyle, Optimizing the design and analysis of cryogenic semiconductor dark matter detectors for maximum sensitivity (Stanford University, 2012).
  10. J. Q. You and F. Nori, Physics Today 58, 42 (2005), arXiv: quant-ph/0601121.
  11. T. Saab, Search for weakly interacting massive particles with the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search experiment (stanford university, 2002).
  12. C. W. Fink, A Gram-Scale low-T c Low-Surface-Coverage Athermal-Phonon Sensitive Dark Matter Detector (University of California, Berkeley, 2022).
  13. S. R. Golwala and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 72, 419 (2022).
  14. T. Guruswamy, D. Goldie, and S. Withington, Superconductor Science and Technology 27, 055012 (2014).
  15. S. W. Leman, Review of Scientific Instruments 83 (2012).
  16. J. Zmuidzinas, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 169 (2012).
  17. J. Baselmans and S. Yates, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1185 (American Institute of Physics, 2009) pp. 160–163.
  18. R. A. Moffatt, Two-dimensional spatial imaging of charge transport in germanium crystals at cryogenic temperatures (Stanford University, 2016).
  19. J. M. Martinis and K. Osborne, arXiv preprint cond-mat/0402415  (2004).
  20. R. Lutchyn, L. Glazman, and A. Larkin, Physical Review B 72, 014517 (2005).
  21. R. Lutchyn and L. Glazman, Physical Review B 75, 184520 (2007).
  22. D. Averin and K. Likharev, Journal of low temperature physics 62, 345 (1986).
  23. V. Manucharyan, Superinductance (2012).
  24. U. Fano, Physical Review 72, 26 (1947).
  25. J. J.-C. Yen, Phonon Sensor Dynamics For Cryogenic Dark Matter Search Experiment: A Study Of Quasiparticle Transport In Aluminum Coupled To Tungsten Transition Edge Sensors (Stanford University, 2015).
  26. B. A. Mazin, in Handbook of Superconductivity (CRC Press, 2022) pp. 756–765.
  27. S. Hsieh and J. L. Levine, Physical Review Letters 20 (1968).
  28. N. Kurinsky, The low-mass limit: Dark matter detectors with eV-scale energy resolution (Stanford University, 2018).
  29. J. Collar, Physical Review D 98, 023005 (2018).
  30. C. Owen and D. Scalapino, Physical Review Letters 28, 1559 (1972).
  31. J. M. Martinis, M. Ansmann, and J. Aumentado, Physical Review Letters 103, 097002 (2009).
  32. J. M. Gordon and A. Goldman, Physical Review B 34, 1500 (1986).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.