PatchProt: Hydrophobic patch prediction using protein foundation models
Abstract: Hydrophobic patches on protein surfaces play important functional roles in protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions. Large hydrophobic surfaces are also involved in the progression of aggregation diseases. Predicting exposed hydrophobic patches from a protein sequence has been shown to be a difficult task. Fine-tuning foundation models allows for adapting a model to the specific nuances of a new task using a much smaller dataset. Additionally, multi-task deep learning offers a promising solution for addressing data gaps, simultaneously outperforming single-task methods. In this study, we harnessed a recently released leading LLM ESM-2. Efficient fine-tuning of ESM-2 was achieved by leveraging a recently developed parameter-efficient fine-tuning method. This approach enabled comprehensive training of model layers without excessive parameters and without the need to include a computationally expensive multiple sequence analysis. We explored several related tasks, at local (residue) and global (protein) levels, to improve the representation of the model. As a result, our fine-tuned ESM-2 model, PatchProt, cannot only predict hydrophobic patch areas but also outperforms existing methods at predicting primary tasks, including secondary structure and surface accessibility predictions. Importantly, our analysis shows that including related local tasks can improve predictions on more difficult global tasks. This research sets a new standard for sequence-based protein property prediction and highlights the remarkable potential of fine-tuning foundation models enriching the model representation by training over related tasks.
- J. H. M. van Gils, D. Gogishvili, J. van Eck, R. Bouwmeester, E. van Dijk, and S. Abeln, “How sticky are our proteins? quantifying hydrophobicity of the human proteome,” Bioinformatics advances, vol. 2, no. 1, p. vbac002, 2022.
- K. A. Dill, “Theory for the folding and stability of globular proteins,” Biochemistry, vol. 24, pp. 1501–1509, 1985.
- K. A. Dill, “Dominant forces in protein folding,” Biochemistry, vol. 29, pp. 7133–7155, 1990.
- C. Chothia and J. Janin, “Principles of protein–protein recognition,” Nature, vol. 256, pp. 705–708, 1975.
- L. Young, R. Jernigan, and D. Covell, “A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition,” Protein Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 717–729, 1994.
- S. M. Gowder, J. Chatterjee, T. Chaudhuri, and K. Paul, “Prediction and analysis of surface hydrophobic residues in tertiary structure of proteins,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, 2014.
- M. G. Iadanza, R. Silvers, J. Boardman, H. I. Smith, T. K. Karamanos, G. T. Debelouchina, Y. Su, R. G. Griffin, N. A. Ranson, and S. E. Radford, “The structure of a β𝛽\betaitalic_β2-microglobulin fibril suggests a molecular basis for its amyloid polymorphism,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, p. 4517, Dec. 2018.
- M. D. Tuttle, G. Comellas, A. J. Nieuwkoop, D. J. Covell, D. A. Berthold, K. D. Kloepper, J. M. Courtney, J. K. Kim, A. M. Barclay, A. Kendall, W. Wan, G. Stubbs, C. D. Schwieters, V. M. Y. Lee, J. M. George, and C. M. Rienstra, “Solid-state NMR structure of a pathogenic fibril of full-length human [alpha]-synuclein,” Nat Struct Mol Biol, vol. 23, pp. 409–415, May 2016.
- F. Chiti and C. M. Dobson, “Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease,” Annu. Rev. Biochem., vol. 75, pp. 333–366, 2006.
- C. M. Dobson, “Protein folding and disease: a view from the first horizon symposium,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 2, pp. 154–160, 2003.
- S. Abeln and D. Frenkel, “Disordered Flanks Prevent Peptide Aggregation,” PLoS Comput Biol, vol. 4, no. 12, p. e1000241, 2008.
- S. Abeln and D. Frenkel, “Accounting for protein-solvent contacts facilitates design of nonaggregating lattice proteins,” Biophysical journal, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 693–700, 2011.
- P. E. Wright and H. J. Dyson, “Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm,” Journal of molecular biology, vol. 293, pp. 321–331, 1999.
- L. Moruz and L. Käll, “Peptide retention time prediction,” Mass spectrometry reviews, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 615–623, 2017.
- K. Sankar, S. R. Krystek Jr, S. M. Carl, T. Day, and J. K. Maier, “Aggscore: Prediction of aggregation-prone regions in proteins based on the distribution of surface patches,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1147–1156, 2018.
- J. M Redington, L. Breydo, and V. N Uversky, “When good goes awry: the aggregation of protein therapeutics,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 340–347, 2017.
- J. Kyte and R. F. Doolittle, “A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 105 – 132, 1982.
- Q. Hou, K. Waury, D. Gogishvili, and K. A. Feenstra, “Ten quick tips for sequence-based prediction of protein properties using machine learning,” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 18, no. 12, p. e1010669, 2022.
- M. S. Klausen, M. C. Jespersen, H. Nielsen, K. K. Jensen, V. I. Jurtz, C. K. Soenderby, M. O. A. Sommer, O. Winther, M. Nielsen, B. Petersen, et al., “Netsurfp-2.0: Improved prediction of protein structural features by integrated deep learning,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 520–527, 2019.
- H. Capel, K. A. Feenstra, and S. Abeln, “Multi-task learning to leverage partially annotated data for ppi interface prediction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 10487, 2022.
- J. J. Almagro Armenteros, C. K. Sønderby, S. K. Sønderby, H. Nielsen, and O. Winther, “Deeploc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning,” Bioinformatics, vol. 33, no. 21, pp. 3387–3395, 2017.
- K. Waury, D. Gogishvili, R. Nieuwland, M. Chatterjee, C. E. Teunissen, and S. Abeln, “Proteome encoded determinants of protein sorting into extracellular vesicles,” Journal of Extracellular Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. e120, 2024.
- S. Khurana, R. Rawi, K. Kunji, G.-Y. Chuang, H. Bensmail, and R. Mall, “Deepsol: a deep learning framework for sequence-based protein solubility prediction,” Bioinformatics, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 2605–2613, 2018.
- J. A. Housmans, G. Wu, J. Schymkowitz, and F. Rousseau, “A guide to studying protein aggregation,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. 554–583, 2023.
- M. H. Høie, E. N. Kiehl, B. Petersen, M. Nielsen, O. Winther, H. Nielsen, J. Hallgren, and P. Marcatili, “Netsurfp-3.0: accurate and fast prediction of protein structural features by protein language models and deep learning,” Nucleic acids research, vol. 50, no. W1, pp. W510–W515, 2022.
- R. Perez, X. Li, S. Giannakoulias, and E. J. Petersson, “Aggbert: Best in class prediction of hexapeptide amyloidogenesis with a semi-supervised protbert model,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2023.
- B. Rost, C. Sander, and R. Schneider, “Phd-an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction,” Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1994.
- C. Camacho, G. Coulouris, V. Avagyan, N. Ma, J. Papadopoulos, K. Bealer, and T. L. Madden, “Blast+: architecture and applications,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 10, pp. 1–9, 2009.
- J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. Žídek, A. Potapenko, et al., “Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold,” Nature, vol. 596, no. 7873, pp. 583–589, 2021.
- M. Remmert, A. Biegert, A. Hauser, and J. Söding, “Hhblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by hmm-hmm alignment,” Nature methods, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 173–175, 2012.
- S. C. Potter, A. Luciani, S. R. Eddy, Y. Park, R. Lopez, and R. D. Finn, “Hmmer web server: 2018 update,” Nucleic acids research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W200–W204, 2018.
- M. Mirdita, M. Steinegger, and J. Söding, “Mmseqs2 desktop and local web server app for fast, interactive sequence searches,” Bioinformatics, vol. 35, no. 16, pp. 2856–2858, 2019.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” 2017.
- K. Chowdhary and K. Chowdhary, “Natural language processing,” Fundamentals of artificial intelligence, pp. 603–649, 2020.
- A. Elnaggar, M. Heinzinger, C. Dallago, G. Rehawi, Y. Wang, L. Jones, T. Gibbs, T. Feher, C. Angerer, M. Steinegger, et al., “Prottrans: Toward understanding the language of life through self-supervised learning,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 7112–7127, 2021.
- M. Heinzinger, A. Elnaggar, Y. Wang, C. Dallago, D. Nechaev, F. Matthes, and B. Rost, “Modeling aspects of the language of life through transfer-learning protein sequences,” BMC bioinformatics, vol. 20, pp. 1–17, 2019.
- Z. Lin, H. Akin, R. Rao, B. Hie, Z. Zhu, W. Lu, N. Smetanin, R. Verkuil, O. Kabeli, Y. Shmueli, et al., “Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model,” Science, vol. 379, no. 6637, pp. 1123–1130, 2023.
- A. Rives, J. Meier, T. Sercu, S. Goyal, Z. Lin, J. Liu, D. Guo, M. Ott, C. L. Zitnick, J. Ma, et al., “Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 15, p. e2016239118, 2021.
- W. Kabsch and C. Sander, “Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features,” Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2577–2637, 1983.
- M. Uhlén, L. Fagerberg, B. M. Hallström, C. Lindskog, P. Oksvold, A. Mardinoglu, Å. Sivertsson, C. Kampf, E. Sjöstedt, A. Asplund, et al., “Tissue-based map of the human proteome,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6220, p. 1260419, 2015.
- E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models,” 2021.
- J. Pfeiffer, A. Kamath, A. Rücklé, K. Cho, and I. Gurevych, “Adapterfusion: Non-destructive task composition for transfer learning,” 2021.
- S. Liu, E. Johns, and A. J. Davison, “End-to-end multi-task learning with attention,” 2019.
- A. Kendall, Y. Gal, and R. Cipolla, “Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics,” 2018.
- L. Liebel and M. Körner, “Auxiliary tasks in multi-task learning,” 2018.
- A. Zemla, Č. Venclovas, J. Moult, and K. Fidelis, “Processing and evaluation of predictions in casp4,” 2001.
- M. Varadi, S. Anyango, M. Deshpande, S. Nair, C. Natassia, G. Yordanova, D. Yuan, O. Stroe, G. Wood, A. Laydon, et al., “Alphafold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models,” Nucleic acids research, vol. 50, no. D1, pp. D439–D444, 2022.
- S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally, “Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00149, 2015.
- R. Goyal, J. Vanschoren, V. Van Acht, and S. Nijssen, “Fixed-point quantization of convolutional neural networks for quantized inference on embedded platforms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02147, 2021.
- Y. Li, Y. Yu, C. Liang, P. He, N. Karampatziakis, W. Chen, and T. Zhao, “Loftq: Lora-fine-tuning-aware quantization for large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08659, 2023.
- M. Kuhn, “Building predictive models in r using the caret package,” Journal of statistical software, vol. 28, pp. 1–26, 2008.
- T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 785–794, 2016.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.