Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Anomaly inflow for CSS and fractonic lattice models and dualities via cluster state measurement

Published 24 May 2024 in quant-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, cond-mat.str-el, and hep-th | (2405.15853v1)

Abstract: Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes are a class of quantum error correction codes that contains the toric code and fracton models. A procedure called foliation defines a cluster state for a given CSS code. We use the CSS chain complex and its tensor product with other chain complexes to describe the topological structure in the foliated cluster state, and argue that it has a symmetry-protected topological order protected by generalized global symmetries supported on cycles in the foliated CSS chain complex. We demonstrate the so-called anomaly inflow between CSS codes and corresponding foliated cluster states by explicitly showing the equality of the gauge transformations of the bulk and boundary partition functions defined as functionals of defect world-volumes. We show that the bulk and boundary defects are related via measurement of the bulk system. Further, we provide a procedure to obtain statistical models associated with general CSS codes via the foliated cluster state, and derive a generalization of the Kramers-Wannier-Wegner duality for such statistical models with insertion of twist defects. We also study the measurement-assisted gauging method with cluster-state entanglers for CSS/fracton models based on recent proposals in the literature, and demonstrate a non-invertible fusion of duality operators. Using the cluster-state entanglers, we construct the so-called strange correlator for general CSS/fracton models. Finally, we introduce a new family of subsystem-symmetric quantum models each of which is self-dual under the generalized Kramers-Wannier-Wegner duality transformation, which becomes a non-invertible symmetry.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (100)
  1. Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu,  and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010), arXiv:1004.3835 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  2. A.Yu. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of Physics 303, 2–30 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/9707021 .
  3. S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings,  and F. Verstraete, “Lieb-Robinson Bounds and the Generation of Correlations and Topological Quantum Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  97, 050401 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0603121 [quant-ph] .
  4. Lorenzo Piroli, Georgios Styliaris,  and J. Ignacio Cirac, “Quantum circuits assisted by local operations and classical communication: Transformations and phases of matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  127, 220503 (2021), arXiv:2103.13367 [quant-ph] .
  5. Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ryan Thorngren, Ashvin Vishwanath,  and Ruben Verresen, “Long-range entanglement from measuring symmetry-protected topological phases,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.01519 (2021), arXiv:2112.01519 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  6. Sergey Bravyi, Isaac Kim, Alexander Kliesch,  and Robert Koenig, “Adaptive constant-depth circuits for manipulating non-abelian anyons,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2205.01933 (2022), arXiv:2205.01933 [quant-ph] .
  7. Tsung-Cheng Lu, Leonardo A. Lessa, Isaac H. Kim,  and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Measurement as a Shortcut to Long-Range Entangled Quantum Matter,” PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022), arXiv:2206.13527 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  8. Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ashvin Vishwanath,  and Ruben Verresen, “Hierarchy of Topological Order From Finite-Depth Unitaries, Measurement, and Feedforward,” PRX Quantum 4, 020339 (2023), arXiv:2209.06202 [quant-ph] .
  9. Yabo Li, Hiroki Sukeno, Aswin Parayil Mana, Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup,  and Tzu-Chieh Wei, “Symmetry-enriched topological order from partially gauging symmetry-protected topologically ordered states assisted by measurements,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 115144 (2023), arXiv:2305.09747 [quant-ph] .
  10. Mohsin Iqbal, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Thomas M. Gatterman, Justin A. Gerber, Kevin Gilmore, Dan Gresh, Aaron Hankin, Nathan Hewitt, Chandler V. Horst, Mitchell Matheny, Tanner Mengle, Brian Neyenhuis, Ashvin Vishwanath, Michael Foss-Feig, Ruben Verresen,  and Henrik Dreyer, “Topological Order from Measurements and Feed-Forward on a Trapped Ion Quantum Computer,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2302.01917 (2023), arXiv:2302.01917 [quant-ph] .
  11. Mohsin Iqbal, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ruben Verresen, Sara L. Campbell, Joan M. Dreiling, Caroline Figgatt, John P. Gaebler, Jacob Johansen, Michael Mills, Steven A. Moses, Juan M. Pino, Anthony Ransford, Mary Rowe, Peter Siegfried, Russell P. Stutz, Michael Foss-Feig, Ashvin Vishwanath,  and Henrik Dreyer, “Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor,” Nature (London) 626, 505–511 (2024), arXiv:2305.03766 [quant-ph] .
  12. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, “Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. part i,” Phys. Rev. 60, 252–262 (1941).
  13. Franz J. Wegner, “Duality in Generalized Ising Models and Phase Transitions without Local Order Parameters,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 12, 2259–2272 (1971).
  14. John B. Kogut, “An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics 51, 659–714 (1979).
  15. Sagar Vijay, Jeongwan Haah,  and Liang Fu, “Fracton topological order, generalized lattice gauge theory, and duality,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 235157 (2016), arXiv:1603.04442 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  16. A. R. Calderbank and Peter W. Shor, “Good quantum error-correcting codes exist,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1098–1105 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9512032 [quant-ph] .
  17. Andrew Steane, “Multiple-Particle Interference and Quantum Error Correction,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 452, 2551–2577 (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9601029 [quant-ph] .
  18. Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel, “A one-way quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001).
  19. Robert Raussendorf, Daniel E. Browne,  and Hans J. Briegel, “Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 022312 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0301052 [quant-ph] .
  20. H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. Dür, R. Raussendorf,  and M. Van den Nest, “Measurement-based quantum computation,” Nature Physics 5, 19–26 (2009).
  21. Tzu-Chieh Wei, “Quantum spin models for measurement-based quantum computation,” Advances in Physics X 3, 1461026 (2018), arXiv:2109.10105 [quant-ph] .
  22. Tzu-Chieh Wei, “Measurement-based quantum computation,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Physics  (2021), 10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.013.31.
  23. A. Bolt, G. Duclos-Cianci, D. Poulin,  and T. M. Stace, “Foliated Quantum Error-Correcting Codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  117, 070501 (2016), arXiv:1607.02579 [quant-ph] .
  24. Robert Raussendorf, Sergey Bravyi,  and Jim Harrington, “Long-range quantum entanglement in noisy cluster states,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 062313 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0407255 [quant-ph] .
  25. Nikolas P. Breuckmann and Jens Niklas Eberhardt, “Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes,” PRX Quantum 2, 040101 (2021), arXiv:2103.06309 [quant-ph] .
  26. Chi-Ming Chang, Ying-Hsuan Lin, Shu-Heng Shao, Yifan Wang,  and Xi Yin, “Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2019, 26 (2019), arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th] .
  27. Shu-Heng Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2308.00747 (2023), arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th] .
  28. Aleksander Kubica and Beni Yoshida, “Ungauging quantum error-correcting codes,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.01836 (2018), arXiv:1805.01836 [quant-ph] .
  29. Zheng-Cheng Gu and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topological order,” Phys. Rev. B 80, 155131 (2009), arXiv:0903.1069 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  30. Frank Pollmann, Erez Berg, Ari M. Turner,  and Masaki Oshikawa, “Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 075125 (2012), arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  31. Frank Pollmann, Ari M. Turner, Erez Berg,  and Masaki Oshikawa, “Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010), arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  32. Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu,  and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011a), arXiv:1008.3745 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  33. Xie Chen, Zheng-Xin Liu,  and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Two-dimensional symmetry-protected topological orders and their protected gapless edge excitations,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 235141 (2011b), arXiv:1106.4752 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  34. Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu,  and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Complete classification of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in interacting spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 235128 (2011c), arXiv:1103.3323 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  35. Norbert Schuch, David Pérez-García,  and Ignacio Cirac, “Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,” Phys. Rev. B 84, 165139 (2011), arXiv:1010.3732 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  36. Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu,  and Xiao-Gang Wen, “Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013), arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  37. Michael Levin and Zheng-Cheng Gu, “Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 115109 (2012), arXiv:1202.3120 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  38. Beni Yoshida, “Topological phases with generalized global symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 155131 (2016), arXiv:1508.03468 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  39. Sam Roberts, Beni Yoshida, Aleksander Kubica,  and Stephen D. Bartlett, “Symmetry-protected topological order at nonzero temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 022306 (2017), arXiv:1611.05450 [quant-ph] .
  40. Yizhi You, Trithep Devakul, F. J. Burnell,  and S. L. Sondhi, “Subsystem symmetry protected topological order,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 035112 (2018), arXiv:1803.02369 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  41. Trithep Devakul, Dominic J. Williamson,  and Yizhi You, “Classification of subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 235121 (2018), arXiv:1808.05300 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  42. Robert Raussendorf, Cihan Okay, Dong-Sheng Wang, David T. Stephen,  and Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, “Computationally Universal Phase of Quantum Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  122, 090501 (2019), arXiv:1803.00095 [quant-ph] .
  43. C. G. Callan and J. A. Harvey, “Anomalies and fermion zero modes on strings and domain walls,” Nuclear Physics B 250, 427–436 (1985).
  44. Fiona J. Burnell, Trithep Devakul, Pranay Gorantla, Ho Tat Lam,  and Shu-Heng Shao, “Anomaly inflow for subsystem symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 085113 (2022), arXiv:2110.09529 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  45. Takuya Okuda, Aswin Parayil Mana,  and Hiroki Sukeno, “Anomaly inflow, dualities, and quantum simulation of abelian lattice gauge theories induced by measurements,”   (2024), arXiv:2402.08720 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  46. Cenke Xu and J. E. Moore, “Reduction of effective dimensionality in lattice models of superconducting arrays and frustrated magnets,” Nuclear Physics B 716, 487–508 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0405271 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  47. Anton Kapustin and Nathan Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,” JHEP 04, 001 (2014), arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th] .
  48. Weiguang Cao, Linhao Li, Masahito Yamazaki,  and Yunqin Zheng, “Subsystem non-invertible symmetry operators and defects,” SciPost Physics 15, 155 (2023), arXiv:2304.09886 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  49. Konstantinos Roumpedakis, Sahand Seifnashri,  and Shu-Heng Shao, “Higher Gauging and Non-invertible Condensation Defects,” Commun. Math. Phys. 401, 3043–3107 (2023), arXiv:2204.02407 [hep-th] .
  50. Claudio Chamon, “Quantum Glassiness in Strongly Correlated Clean Systems: An Example of Topological Overprotection,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  94, 040402 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0404182 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  51. Yi-Zhuang You, Zhen Bi, Alex Rasmussen, Kevin Slagle,  and Cenke Xu, “Wave Function and Strange Correlator of Short-Range Entangled States,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  112, 247202 (2014), arXiv:1312.0626 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  52. Robijn Vanhove, Matthias Bal, Dominic J Williamson, Nick Bultinck, Jutho Haegeman,  and Frank Verstraete, “Mapping topological to conformal field theories through strange correlators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  121, 177203 (2018), arXiv:1801.05959 [quant-ph] .
  53. David Aasen, Roger S. K. Mong,  and Paul Fendley, “Topological defects on the lattice: I. The Ising model,” Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 49, 354001 (2016), arXiv:1601.07185 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
  54. David Aasen, Paul Fendley,  and Roger S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2008.08598 (2020), arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
  55. Masataka Koide, Yuta Nagoya,  and Satoshi Yamaguchi, “Non-invertible topological defects in 4-dimensional ℤ2subscriptℤ2\mathbb{Z}_{2}blackboard_Z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT pure lattice gauge theory,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2022, 013B03 (2022), arXiv:2109.05992 [hep-th] .
  56. Nathan Seiberg and Shu-Heng Shao, “Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,” SciPost Physics 16, 064 (2024), arXiv:2307.02534 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  57. Aswin Parayil Mana, Yabo Li, Hiroki Sukeno,  and Tzu-Chieh Wei, “Kennedy-Tasaki transformation and non-invertible symmetry in lattice models beyond one dimension,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.09520 (2024), arXiv:2402.09520 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  58. Sam Roberts and Stephen D Bartlett, “Symmetry-protected self-correcting quantum memories,” Physical Review X 10, 031041 (2020), arXiv:1805.01474 [quant-ph] .
  59. Michael H Freedman and David A Meyer, “Projective plane and planar quantum codes,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics 1, 325–332 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/9810055 .
  60. H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Homological error correction: Classical and quantum codes,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 48, 052105–052105 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0605094 [quant-ph] .
  61. R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington,  and K. Goyal, “A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer,” Annals of Physics 321, 2242–2270 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0510135 [quant-ph] .
  62. Dominic V. Else and Chetan Nayak, “Classifying symmetry-protected topological phases through the anomalous action of the symmetry on the edge,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 235137 (2014), arXiv:1409.5436 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  63. Hiroki Sukeno and Takuya Okuda, “Measurement-based quantum simulation of Abelian lattice gauge theories,” SciPost Physics 14, 129 (2023), arXiv:2210.10908 [quant-ph] .
  64. Nathan Seiberg and Shu-Heng Shao, “Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” SciPost Phys. 10, 027 (2021), arXiv:2003.10466 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  65. Wilbur Shirley, Kevin Slagle,  and Xie Chen, “Fractional excitations in foliated fracton phases,” Annals of Physics 410, 167922 (2019a), arXiv:1806.08625 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  66. Gerard ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 135–157 (1980).
  67. Cheng-Ju Lin, Weicheng Ye, Yijian Zou, Shengqi Sang,  and Timothy H. Hsieh, “Probing sign structure using measurement-induced entanglement,” Quantum 7, 910 (2023), arXiv:2205.05692 [quant-ph] .
  68. Zihan Cheng, Rui Wen, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Romain Vasseur,  and Andrew C. Potter, “Universal structure of measurement-induced information in many-body ground states,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.11615 (2023), arXiv:2312.11615 [quant-ph] .
  69. Pranay Gorantla, Ho Tat Lam, Nathan Seiberg,  and Shu-Heng Shao, “Global dipole symmetry, compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 045112 (2022), arXiv:2201.10589 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  70. Hiromi Ebisu, Masazumi Honda,  and Taiichi Nakanishi, “Foliated BF theories and Multipole symmetries,”   (2023), arXiv:2310.06701 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  71. Hiromi Ebisu, Masazumi Honda,  and Taiichi Nakanishi, “Multipole and fracton topological order via gauging foliated SPT phases,”   (2024), arXiv:2401.10677 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  72. Shutaro Shimamura, “Anomaly of Subsystem Symmetries in Exotic and Foliated B⁢F𝐵𝐹BFitalic_B italic_F Theories,”   (2024), arXiv:2404.10601 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  73. Ruben Verresen, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn,  and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Efficiently preparing Schrödinger’s cat, fractons and non-Abelian topological order in quantum devices,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2112.03061 (2021), arXiv:2112.03061 [quant-ph] .
  74. Jong Yeon Lee, Wenjie Ji, Zhen Bi,  and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Decoding Measurement-Prepared Quantum Phases and Transitions: from Ising model to gauge theory, and beyond,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2208.11699 (2022), arXiv:2208.11699 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  75. Wilbur Shirley, Kevin Slagle,  and Xie Chen, “Foliated fracton order in the checkerboard model,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 115123 (2019b), arXiv:1806.08633 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  76. Xie Chen, Arpit Dua, Michael Hermele, David T. Stephen, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Robijn Vanhove,  and Jing-Yu Zhao, “Sequential quantum circuits as maps between gapped phases,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 075116 (2024), arXiv:2307.01267 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  77. Nathan Seiberg, Sahand Seifnashri,  and Shu-Heng Shao, “Non-invertible symmetries and LSM-type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.12281 (2024), arXiv:2401.12281 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  78. Cenke Xu and J. E. Moore, “Strong-Weak Coupling Self-Duality in the Two-Dimensional Quantum Phase Transition of p+ip Superconducting Arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  93, 047003 (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0312587 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  79. Michael Pretko, “Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 115139 (2017), arXiv:1604.05329 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  80. Michael Pretko, Xie Chen,  and Yizhi You, “Fracton Phases of Matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2030003 (2020), arXiv:2001.01722 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  81. Nathan Seiberg and Shu-Heng Shao, “Exotic U⁢(1)𝑈1U(1)italic_U ( 1 ) Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 3+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” SciPost Phys. 9, 046 (2020), arXiv:2004.00015 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  82. Tibor Rakovszky and Vedika Khemani, “The Physics of (good) LDPC Codes II. Product constructions,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.16831 (2024), arXiv:2402.16831 [quant-ph] .
  83. Yi Tan, Brenden Roberts, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Beni Yoshida,  and Norman Y. Yao, “Fracton models from product codes,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.08462 (2023), arXiv:2312.08462 [quant-ph] .
  84. Benjamin J Brown and Sam Roberts, “Universal fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation,” Physical Review Research 2, 033305 (2020), arXiv:1811.11780 [quant-ph] .
  85. Matthew B. Hastings and Jeongwan Haah, “Dynamically Generated Logical Qubits,” Quantum 5, 564 (2021), arXiv:2107.02194 [quant-ph] .
  86. Margarita Davydova, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn,  and Shankar Balasubramanian, “Floquet Codes without Parent Subsystem Codes,” PRX Quantum 4, 020341 (2023), arXiv:2210.02468 [quant-ph] .
  87. Markus S. Kesselring, Julio C. Magdalena de la Fuente, Felix Thomsen, Jens Eisert, Stephen D. Bartlett,  and Benjamin J. Brown, “Anyon condensation and the color code,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2212.00042 (2022), arXiv:2212.00042 [quant-ph] .
  88. Stefano Paesani and Benjamin J. Brown, “High-Threshold Quantum Computing by Fusing One-Dimensional Cluster States,” Phys. Rev. Lett.  131, 120603 (2023), arXiv:2212.06775 [quant-ph] .
  89. Davide Gaiotto and Justin Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,” JHEP 02, 132 (2021), arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th] .
  90. Fabio Apruzzi, Federico Bonetti, Iñaki García Etxebarria, Saghar S. Hosseini,  and Sakura Schäfer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 402, 895–949 (2023), arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th] .
  91. Daniel S. Freed, Gregory W. Moore,  and Constantin Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”  (2022), arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th] .
  92. Justin Kaidi, Kantaro Ohmori,  and Yunqin Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 404, 1021–1124 (2023), arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th] .
  93. Lin Chen, Haochen Zhang, Kaixin Ji, Ce Shen, Ruoshui Wang, Xiangdong Zeng,  and Ling-Yan Hung, “Exact Holographic Tensor Networks – Constructing CFTD from TQFTD+1,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2210.12127 (2022), arXiv:2210.12127 [hep-th] .
  94. Elliott Lieb, Theodore Schultz,  and Daniel Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,” Annals of Physics 16, 407–466 (1961).
  95. Jeongwan Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 042330 (2011), arXiv:1101.1962 [quant-ph] .
  96. Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, “Jordan-Wigner dualities for translation-invariant Hamiltonians in any dimension: Emergent fermions in fracton topological order,” Physical Review Research 2, 023353 (2020), arXiv:2002.11345 [cond-mat.str-el] .
  97. Allen Hatcher, Algebraic topology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002) pp. xii+544.
  98. Joseph J Rotman, An introduction to algebraic topology, Vol. 119 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
  99. Tsit-Yuen Lam, Lectures on modules and rings, Vol. 189 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
  100. Jeongwan Haah, “Commuting pauli hamiltonians as maps between free modules,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 324, 351–399 (2013).
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free