Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Multi-qubit quantum state preparation enabled by topology optimization

Published 24 May 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.other | (2405.15361v2)

Abstract: Using topology optimization, we inverse-design nanophotonic cavities enabling the preparation of pure states of pairs and triples of quantum emitters. Our devices involve moderate values of the dielectric constant, operate under continuous laser driving, and yield fidelities to the target (Bell and W) states approaching unity for distant qubits (several natural wavelengths apart). In the fidelity optimization procedure, our algorithm generates entanglement by maximizing the dissipative coupling between the emitters, which allows the formation of multipartite pure steady states in the driven-dissipative dynamics of the system. Our findings open the way towards the efficient and fast preparation of multiqubit quantum states with engineered features, with potential applications for nonclassical light generation, quantum simulation, and quantum sensing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. A. Blanco-Redondo, Topological nanophotonics: Toward robust quantum circuits, Proceedings of the IEEE 108, 837 (2020).
  2. Z. Kuang and O. D. Miller, Computational bounds to light–matter interactions via local conservation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 263607 (2020).
  3. J. Jensen and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization for nano-photonics, Laser & Photonics Reviews 5, 308 (2011).
  4. D. Sych and G. Leuchs, A complete basis of generalized bell states, New Journal of Physics 11, 013006 (2009).
  5. A. Vivas-Viaña, A. González-Tudela, and C. S. Muñoz, Unconventional mechanism of virtual-state population through dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012217 (2022).
  6. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000a).
  7. H. T. Dung, L. Knöll, and D.-G. Welsch, Resonant dipole-dipole interaction in the presence of dispersing and absorbing surroundings, Phys. Rev. A 66, 063810 (2002).
  8. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2007).
  9. L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
  10. D. Dzsotjan, A. S. Sorensen, and M. Fleischhauer, Quantum emitters coupled to surface plasmons of a nanowire: A green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075427 (2010).
  11. R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994).
  12. R. Bennett and S. Y. Buhmann, Inverse design of light–matter interactions in macroscopic QED, New Journal of Physics 22, 093014 (2020).
  13. R. Bennett, Inverse design of environment-induced coherence, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013706 (2021).
  14. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  15. Z. Ficek and R. Tanaś, Entangled states and collective nonclassical effects in two-atom systems, Physics Reports 372, 369 (2002).
  16. A. Canaguier-Durand, R. Pierrat, and R. Carminati, Cross density of states and mode connectivity: Probing wave localization in complex media, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013835 (2019).
  17. A. F. Alharbi and Z. Ficek, Deterministic creation of stationary entangled states by dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 82, 054103 (2010).
  18. M. J. Kastoryano, F. Reiter, and A. S. Sørensen, Dissipative preparation of entanglement in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090502 (2011).
  19. H. Zheng and H. U. Baranger, Persistent quantum beats and long-distance entanglement from waveguide-mediated interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 113601 (2013).
  20. D. Manzano and P. Hurtado, Harnessing symmetry to control quantum transport, Advances in Physics 67, 1 (2018).
  21. V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014).
  22. A. R. R. Carvalho, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Decoherence and multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230501 (2004).
  23. N. Brunner, J. Sharam, and T. Vértesi, Testing the structure of multipartite entanglement with bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 110501 (2012).
  24. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000b).
  25. M. R. Bonyadi and Z. Michalewicz, Particle Swarm Optimization for Single Objective Continuous Space Problems: A Review, Evolutionary Computation 25, 1 (2017), https://direct.mit.edu/evco/article-pdf/25/1/1/1535702/evco_r_00180.pdf .
  26. W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.