Anticipating Optical Availability in Hybrid RF/FSO Links Using RF Beacons and Deep Learning
Abstract: Radio frequency (RF) communications offer reliable but low data rates and energy-inefficient satellite links, while free-space optical (FSO) promises high bandwidth but struggles with disturbances imposed by atmospheric effects. A hybrid RF/FSO architecture aims to achieve optimal reliability along with high data rates for space communications. Accurate prediction of dynamic ground-to-satellite FSO link availability is critical for routing decisions in low-earth orbit constellations. In this paper, we propose a system leveraging ubiquitous RF links to proactively forecast FSO link degradation prior to signal drops below threshold levels. This enables pre-calculation of rerouting to maximally maintain high data rate FSO links throughout the duration of weather effects. We implement a supervised learning model to anticipate FSO attenuation based on the analysis of RF patterns. Through the simulation of a dense lower earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in a simulated satellite network, highlighting the balance between predictive accuracy and prediction duration. An emulated cloud attenuation model is proposed which provides insight into the temporal profiles of RF signals and their correlation to FSO channel dynamics. Our investigation sheds light on the trade-offs between prediction horizon and accuracy arising from RF beacon proximity, achieving a prediction accuracy of 86\% with 16 RF beacons.
- E. B. Nadales, “Impact of traffic growth on networks and investment needs,” 2023, telefónica Communication Room Blog. Accessed: 8 Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/impact-of-traffic-growth-on-networks-and-investment-needs/
- T. Review. (2022) Connectivity gap: Unbroken adversity in rural areas. Accessed: 8 Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.telecomreview.com/articles/reports-and-coverage/6294-connectivity-gap-unbroken-adversity-in-rural-areas
- V. Angelopoulos, “The ARTEMIS mission,” The ARTEMIS mission, pp. 3–25, 2014.
- NASA, “Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration NASA’s First Space Laser Communication System Demonstration,” https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/llcdfactsheet.final_.web_.pdf, December 2015, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- ——, “Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) Overview,” https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/tech-demo-missions-program/laser-communications-relay-demonstration-lcrd-overview/, Access year, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- ——, “CubeSat Set to Demonstrate NASA’s Fastest Laser Link from Space,” https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/somd/cubesat-set-to-demonstrate-nasas-fastest-laser-link-from-space/, May 2022, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- ——, “Orion Artemis II Optical Communications System (O2O),” https://www.nasa.gov/mission/o2o/, January 2024, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- ——, “Integrated LCRD LEO User Modem and Amplifier Terminal (ILLUMA-T),” https://www.nasa.gov/mission/illumat/, September 2023, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- ——, “Deep Space Optical Communications (DSOC),” https://www.nasa.gov/mission/deep-space-optical-communications-dsoc/, October 2023, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- P. Giordano, F. Malman, R. Swinden, P. Zoccarato, and J. Ventura-Traveset, “The Lunar Pathfinder PNT Experiment and Moonlight Navigation Service: The Future of Lunar Position, Navigation and Timing,” in Proceedings of the 2022 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, 2022, pp. 632–642.
- C. Li, C. Wang, Y. Wei, and Y. Lin, “China’s present and future lunar exploration program,” Science, vol. 365, no. 6450, pp. 238–239, 2019.
- K. Durga Prasad, M. Bhatt, G. Ambily, S. Sathyan, D. Misra, N. Srivastava, and A. Bhardwaj, “Contextual characterization study of Chandrayaan-3 primary landing site,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, vol. 526, no. 1, pp. L116–L123, 2023.
- Smirnov, VM and Yushkova, OV and Marchuk, VN and Abramov, VV and Kvylinskii, Yu F and Lyakhov, Yu N, “Luna-Glob project: Radio sounding of the lunar soil,” Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, vol. 58, pp. 911–918, 2013.
- A. Alhilal, T. Braud, and P. Hui, “The Sky is NOT the Limit Anymore: Future Architecture of the Interplanetary Internet,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 22–32, 2019.
- W. Raza, E. Abele, J. O’Hara, B. Sadr, P. LoPresti, A. Imran, W. Choi, I. Song, S. Altunc, O. Kegege, and S. Ekin, “Toward a Hybrid RF/Optical Lunar Communication System (LunarComm),” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 76–83, 2022.
- X. Lin, S. Rommer, S. Euler, E. A. Yavuz, and R. S. Karlsson, “5G from space: An overview of 3GPP non-terrestrial networks,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 147–153, 2021.
- F. Rinaldi, H.-L. Maattanen, J. Torsner, S. Pizzi, S. Andreev, A. Iera, Y. Koucheryavy, and G. Araniti, “Non-terrestrial networks in 5G & beyond: A survey,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 165 178–165 200, 2020.
- N. Cheng, H. Jingchao, Y. Zhisheng, Z. Conghao, W. Huaqing, L. Feng, Z. Haibo, and S. Xuemin, “6G service-oriented space-air-ground integrated network: A survey,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1–18, 2022.
- P. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Yan, B. G. Evans, and W. Wang, “Convergence of satellite and terrestrial networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 5550–5588, 2019.
- N. Saeed, H. Almorad, H. Dahrouj, T. Y. Al-Naffouri, J. S. Shamma, and M.-S. Alouini, “Point-to-point communication in integrated satellite-aerial 6G networks: State-of-the-art and future challenges,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 2, pp. 1505–1525, 2021.
- S. Zhang, D. Zhu, and Y. Wang, “A survey on space-aerial-terrestrial integrated 5G networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 174, p. 107212, 2020.
- T. Naous, M. Itani, M. Awad, and S. Sharafeddine, “Reinforcement learning in the sky: A survey on enabling intelligence in ntn-based communications,” IEEE Access, 2023.
- F. Fourati and M.-S. Alouini, “Artificial intelligence for satellite communication: A review,” Intelligent and Converged Networks, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 213–243, 2021.
- J.-H. Lee, J. Park, M. Bennis, and Y.-C. Ko, “Integrating LEO satellite and UAV relaying via reinforcement learning for non-terrestrial networks,” in GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.
- A. H. Arani, P. Hu, and Y. Zhu, “Fairness-aware link optimization for space-terrestrial integrated networks: A reinforcement learning framework,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 77 624–77 636, 2021.
- M. M. Abadi and Z. Ghassemlooy, “A Hybrid Free-Space Optical (FSO)/Radio Frequency (RF) Antenna for Satellite Applications,” in 2022 13th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), 2022, pp. 185–190.
- O. B. Yahia, E. Erdogan, G. K. Kurt, I. Altunbas, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “HAPS Selection for Hybrid RF/FSO Satellite Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 2855–2867, 2022.
- H. Kaushal and G. Kaddoum, “Optical communication in space: Challenges and mitigation techniques,” IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 57–96, 2016.
- T. A. Alawadi, “Investigation of the effects of cloud attenuation on satellite communication systems,” 2012.
- A. Dissanayake, J. Allnutt, and F. Haidara, “A prediction model that combines rain attenuation and other propagation impairments along earth-satellite paths,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1546–1558, 1997.
- E. Salonen and S. Uppala, “New prediction method of cloud attenuation,” Electronics letters, vol. 27, pp. 1106–1108, 1991.
- Recommendation, I.T.U.R.P., “Attenuation due to clouds and fog,” ITU-R, ITU-R Recommendation ITU-R P.840-8, 2019.
- M. S. Awan, E. Leitgeb, B. Hillbrand, F. Nadeem, M. Khan et al., “Cloud attenuations for free-space optical links,” in 2009 International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications. IEEE, 2009, pp. 274–278.
- I. I. Kim, B. McArthur, and E. J. Korevaar, “Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications,” in Optical wireless communications III, vol. 4214. Spie, 2001, pp. 26–37.
- F. Nadeem, V. Kvicera, M. S. Awan, E. Leitgeb, S. S. Muhammad, and G. Kandus, “Weather effects on hybrid FSO/RF communication link,” IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1687–1697, 2009.
- Vision through the atmosphere. University of Toronto Press, 1952.
- W. Dong, X. Zhang, and C. Zhang, “Generation of Cloud Image Based on Perlin Noise,” in 2010 International Conference on Multimedia Communications, 2010, pp. 61–63.
- K. Liu, S. Yu, and S. Liu, “An Improved InceptionV3 Network for Obscured Ship Classification in Remote Sensing Images,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 13, pp. 4738–4747, 2020.
- A. Guillaume, B. Kahn, Q. Yue, E. Fetzer, S. Wong, G. Manipon, H. Hua, and B. Wilson, “Horizontal and vertical scaling of cloud geometry inferred from CloudSat data,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 2187–2197, 2018.
- NASA, “NASA, Industry to Collaborate on Space Communications by 2025,” https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-industry-to-collaborate-on-space-communications-by-2025/, April 2022, accessed: 2024-02-06.
- A. U. Chaudhry and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Laser Intersatellite Links in a Starlink Constellation: A Classification and Analysis,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 48–56, 2021.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.