Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

PLASMA -- Platform for Service Management in Digital Remote Maintenance Applications

Published 20 May 2024 in cs.DC | (2405.11836v1)

Abstract: To support maintenance and servicing of industrial machines, service processes are even today often performed manually and analogously, although supportive technologies such as augmented reality, virtual reality and digital platforms already exist. In many cases, neither technicians on-site nor remote experts have all the essential information and options for suitable actions available. Existing service products and platforms do not cover all the required functions in practice in order to map end-to-end processes. PLASMA is a concept for a Cloud-based remote maintenance platform designed to meet these demands. But for a real-life implementation of PLASMA, security measures are essential as we show in this paper.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. Y. Liao, F. Deschamps, E. de Freitas Rocha Loures and L. F. Pierin Ramos, “Past, present and future of industry 4.0 – A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal.” International journal of production research, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3609–3629, 2017.
  2. D. Zuehlke, “Smartfactory – towards a factory-of-things.” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 2010.
  3. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST definition of Cloud Computing.” SP 800-145, 2011, URL: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145 [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  4. PwC, Ed., “Key findings from The Global State of Information Security Survey 2017.” Technical Report, 2017, URL: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/assets/2017-gsisss-bold-steps-to-manage-geopolitical-threats-final.pdf [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  5. K. Kertysova, E. Frinking, K. van den Dool, A. Maričić and K. Bhattacharyya, “Cybersecurity: Ensuring awareness and resilience of the private sector across europe in face of mounting cyber risks – Study.” Technical Report, European Economic and Social Committee, March 2018, URL: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/publications-other-work/publications/cybersecurity-ensuring-awareness-and-resilience-private-sector-across- europe-face-mounting-cyber-risks-study [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  6. R. Langner, “Stuxnet: Dissecting a cyberwarfare weapon.” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 49–51, 2011.
  7. R. Baxter, “Bluemix and the Internet of Things”, 2014, URL: https://developer.ibm.com/bluemix/2014/07/16/bluemix-internet-things [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  8. R. Bodenheim, J. Butts, S. Dunlap and B. Mullins, “Evaluation of the ability of the Shodan search engine to identify Internet-facing industrial control devices.” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 114–123, 2014.
  9. A.-R. Sadeghi, C. Wachsmann and M. Waidner, “Security and privacy challenges in Industrial Internet of Things” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC), June 07–11, 2015, San Francisco, USA. ACM, Article no. 54, ISBN: 978-1-4503-3520-1, 2015.
  10. L. Thames and D. Schaefer, Eds., “Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0. Analysis for Design and Manufacturing.” Springer, ISBN: 978-3-319-50659-3, 2017.
  11. J. Dia and S. Smith, “A Hardware Threat Modeling Concept for Trustable Integrated Circuits” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Region 5 Technical Conference, April 20–22, 2007, Fayetteville, USA. IEEE, Nov. 2007, pp. 354–357, ISBN: 978-1-4244-1279-2, 2007.
  12. A. B. Shahri and Z. Ismail, “A tree model for identification of threats as the first stage of risk assessment in HIS.” Journal of Information Security, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 2012.
  13. K. Boeckl et. al, “Considerations for Managing Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks.” Draft NISTIR 8228, September 2018, URL: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8228-draft [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  14. B. Tang, Q. Li and R. Sandhu, “A multi-tenant RBAC model for collaborative cloud services” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, July 10–12, 2013, Tarragona, Spain. IEEE, Sep. 2013, pp. 229–238, ISBN: 978-1-4673-5839-2.
  15. B. Balamurugan, E. Durga Chowdary and S. Linkesh, “A Combined Architecture for RBAC and DAC for Inter-cloud Communication” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Eco-friendly Computing and Communication Systems, December 18–21, 2014, Mangalore, India. IEEE, Aug. 2015, pp. 167–171, ISBN: 978-1-4799-7002-5.
  16. ESSERT GmbH, Ed., “Augmented Support”, 2019, URL: https://www.essert.com/en/digital-processes [accessed: 2019.04.12]
  17. G. Weir, A. Aßmuth and N. Jäger, “Managing Forensic Recovery in the Cloud”, International Journal on Advances in Security, vol. 11, no. 3 & 4, pp. 264–273, 2018.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.