Towards Foundation Model for Chemical Reactor Modeling: Meta-Learning with Physics-Informed Adaptation
Abstract: Developing accurate models for chemical reactors is often challenging due to the complexity of reaction kinetics and process dynamics. Traditional approaches require retraining models for each new system, limiting generalizability and efficiency. In this work, we take a step toward foundation models for chemical reactor modeling by introducing a neural network framework that generalizes across diverse reactor types and rapidly adapts to new chemical processes. Our approach leverages meta-learning to pretrain the model on a broad set of reactor dynamics, enabling efficient adaptation to unseen reactions with minimal data. To further enhance generalizability, we incorporate physics-informed fine-tuning, ensuring physically consistent adaptation to new reactor conditions. Our framework is evaluated across three integer-order fundamental reactor types - continuous stirred tank reactors, batch reactors, and plug flow reactors - demonstrating superior few-shot adaptation compared to conventional data-driven, physics-informed, and transfer learning approaches. By combining meta-learning with physics-informed adaptation, this work lays the foundation for a generalizable modeling framework, advancing the development of foundation models for chemical engineering applications. Source code is available at https://github.com/killingbear999/chemical-reactor-foundation-model.
- R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill, et al., “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
- J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F. L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat, et al., “Gpt-4 Technical Report,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
- T. Brooks, B. Peebles, C. Homes, W. DePue, Y. Guo, L. Jing, D. Schnurr, J. Taylor, T. Luhman, E. Luhman, et al., “Video Generation Models as World Simulators, 2024,” URL https://openai. com/research/video-generation-models-as-world-simulators.
- S. Takeda, A. Kishimoto, L. Hamada, D. Nakano, and J. R. Smith, “Foundation Model for Material Science,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 15376–15383, 2023.
- W. Ahmad, E. Simon, S. Chithrananda, G. Grand, and B. Ramsundar, “Chemberta-2: Towards Chemical Foundation Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01712, 2022.
- Y. Yang, R. Shi, Z. Li, S. Jiang, Y. Yang, B.-L. Lu, and H. Zhao, “BatGPT-Chem: A Foundation Large Model for Chemical Engineering,” 2024.
- F. Lanusse, L. Parker, S. Golkar, M. Cranmer, A. Bietti, M. Eickenberg, G. Krawezik, M. McCabe, R. Ohana, M. Pettee, et al., “AstroCLIP: Cross-Modal Pre-Training for Astronomical Foundation Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03024, 2023.
- M. McCabe, B. R.-S. Blancard, L. H. Parker, R. Ohana, M. Cranmer, A. Bietti, M. Eickenberg, S. Golkar, G. Krawezik, F. Lanusse, et al., “Multiple Physics Pretraining for Physical Surrogate Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02994, 2023.
- B. Decardi-Nelson, A. S. Alshehri, A. Ajagekar, and F. You, “Generative AI and Process Systems Engineering: The Next Frontier,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, p. 108723, 2024.
- S. Horawalavithana, E. Ayton, S. Sharma, S. Howland, M. Subramanian, S. Vasquez, R. Cosbey, M. Glenski, and S. Volkova, “Foundation Models of Scientific Knowledge for Chemistry: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned,” in Proceedings of BigScience Episode# 5–Workshop on Challenges & Perspectives in Creating Large Language Models, pp. 160–172, 2022.
- M. Livne, Z. Miftahutdinov, E. Tutubalina, M. Kuznetsov, D. Polykovskiy, A. Brundyn, A. Jhunjhunwala, A. Costa, A. Aliper, and A. Zhavoronkov, “nach0: Multimodal Natural and Chemical Languages Foundation Model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12410, 2023.
- Z. Wu, A. Tran, D. Rincon, and P. D. Christofides, “Machine Learning-Based Predictive Control of Nonlinear Processes. Part I: Theory,” AIChE Journal, vol. 65, no. 11, p. e16729, 2019.
- Z. Wu, A. Tran, D. Rincon, and P. D. Christofides, “Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Control of Nonlinear Processes. Part II: Computational Implementation,” AIChE Journal, vol. 65, no. 11, p. e16734, 2019.
- Z. Wang and Z. Wu, “Input Convex LSTM: A Convex Approach for Fast Lyapunov-Based Model Predictive Control,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07202, 2023.
- M. Xiao, C. Hu, and Z. Wu, “Modeling and Predictive Control of Nonlinear Processes using Transfer Learning Method,” AIChE Journal, vol. 69, no. 7, p. e18076, 2023.
- M. Xiao, K. Vellayappan, P. Pravin, K. Gudena, and Z. Wu, “Optimization-Based Multi-Source Transfer Learning for Modeling of Nonlinear Processes,” Chemical Engineering Science, p. 120117, 2024.
- F. Zhuang, Z. Qi, K. Duan, D. Xi, Y. Zhu, H. Zhu, H. Xiong, and Q. He, “A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 43–76, 2020.
- A. Nichol and J. Schulman, “Reptile: A Scalable Metalearning Algorithm,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02999, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 4, 2018.
- C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks,” in International conference on machine learning, pp. 1126–1135, PMLR, 2017.
- C. Finn, K. Xu, and S. Levine, “Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
- C. Finn, A. Rajeswaran, S. Kakade, and S. Levine, “Online Meta-Learning,” in International conference on machine learning, pp. 1920–1930, PMLR, 2019.
- M. Khodak, M.-F. F. Balcan, and A. S. Talwalkar, “Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methods,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
- A. Rajeswaran, C. Finn, S. M. Kakade, and S. Levine, “Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradients,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019.
- A. Nichol, J. Achiam, and J. Schulman, “On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02999, 2018.
- P. Rathore, W. Lei, Z. Frangella, L. Lu, and M. Udell, “Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01868, 2024.
- J. Pfeiffer, S. Ruder, I. Vulić, and E. M. Ponti, “Modular Deep Learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11529, 2023.
- S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.
- T. K. Rusch and S. Mishra, “Unicornn: A Recurrent Model for Learning very Long Time Dependencies,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 9168–9178, PMLR, 2021.
- A. Orvieto, S. L. Smith, A. Gu, A. Fernando, C. Gulcehre, R. Pascanu, and S. De, “Resurrecting Recurrent Neural Networks for Long Sequences,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 26670–26698, PMLR, 2023.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is All You Need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.