Decentralized Privacy Preservation for Critical Connections in Graphs
Abstract: Many real-world interconnections among entities can be characterized as graphs. Collecting local graph information with balanced privacy and data utility has garnered notable interest recently. This paper delves into the problem of identifying and protecting critical information of entity connections for individual participants in a graph based on cohesive subgraph searches. This problem has not been addressed in the literature. To address the problem, we propose to extract the critical connections of a queried vertex using a fortress-like cohesive subgraph model known as $p$-cohesion. A user's connections within a fortress are obfuscated when being released, to protect critical information about the user. Novel merit and penalty score functions are designed to measure each participant's critical connections in the minimal $p$-cohesion, facilitating effective identification of the connections. We further propose to preserve the privacy of a vertex enquired by only protecting its critical connections when responding to queries raised by data collectors. We prove that, under the decentralized differential privacy (DDP) mechanism, one's response satisfies $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DDP when its critical connections are protected while the rest remains unperturbed. The effectiveness of our proposed method is demonstrated through extensive experiments on real-life graph datasets.
- G. Cormode, D. Srivastava, S. Bhagat, and B. Krishnamurthy, “Class-based graph anonymization for social network data,” Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 766–777, 2009.
- C. Brandt and J. Leskovec, “Status and friendship: mechanisms of social network evolution,” in Proc. WWW 2014, pp. 229–230.
- V. T. Chakaravarthy, M. Kapralov, P. Murali, F. Petrini, X. Que, Y. Sabharwal, and B. Schieber, “Subgraph counting: Color coding beyond trees,” in IPDPS 2016, pp. 2–11.
- Y. Li, M. Purcell, T. Rakotoarivelo, D. Smith, T. Ranbaduge, and K. S. Ng, “Private graph data release: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1–39, 2021.
- H. Sun, X. Xiao, I. Khalil, Y. Yang, Z. Qin, W. H. Wang, and T. Yu, “Analyzing subgraph statistics from extended local views with decentralized differential privacy,” in CCS 2019, pp. 703–717.
- S. B. Seidman, “Network structure and minimum degree,” Social networks, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 269–287, 1983.
- B. Yang, D. Wen, L. Qin, Y. Zhang, L. Chang, and R. Li, “Index-based optimal algorithm for computing k-cores in large uncertain graphs,” in ICDE 2019, pp. 64–75.
- F. Zhang, L. Yuan, Y. Zhang, L. Qin, X. Lin, and A. Zhou, “Discovering strong communities with user engagement and tie strength,” in DASFAA 2018, vol. 10827, pp. 425–441.
- X. Huang, H. Cheng, L. Qin, W. Tian, and J. X. Yu, “Querying k-truss community in large and dynamic graphs,” in SIGMOD 2014. , pp. 1311–1322.
- Y. Fang, R. Cheng, S. Luo, and J. Hu, “Effective community search for large attributed graphs,” Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1233–1244, 2016.
- L. Yuan, L. Qin, X. Lin, L. Chang, and W. Zhang, “Diversified top-k clique search,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 171–196, 2016.
- S. Morris, “Contagion,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 2000.
- D. J. Watts, “A simple model of global cascades on random networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 5766–5771, 2002.
- R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem, and A. Vespignani, “Epidemic processes in complex networks,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 87, no. 3, p. 925, 2015.
- C. Li, F. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Qin, W. Zhang, and X. Lin, “Discovering fortress-like cohesive subgraphs,” Knowl. Inf. Syst., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 3217–3250, 2021.
- D. H. Zanette, “Critical behavior of propagation on small-world networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 64, no. 5, p. 050901, 2001.
- K. Sun, W. Wang, L. Gao, Y. Wang, K. Luo, L. Ren, Z. Zhan, X. Chen, S. Zhao, Y. Huang et al., “Transmission heterogeneities, kinetics, and controllability of sars-cov-2,” Science, vol. 371, no. 6526, p. eabe2424, 2021.
- C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. D. Smith, “Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis,” in Proc. TCC 2006, vol. 3876, pp. 265–284.
- M. Hay, C. Li, G. Miklau, and D. D. Jensen, “Accurate estimation of the degree distribution of private networks,” in ICDM 2009, pp. 169–178.
- C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. D. Smith, “Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis,” in Proc. TCC, vol. 3876. Springer, 2006, pp. 265–284.
- R. A. Rossi and N. K. Ahmed, “The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization,” in Proc. AAAI, 2015.
- J. Kunegis, “KONECT – The Koblenz Network Collection,” in Proc. WWW, 2013, pp. 1343–1350.
- C. Dwork and A. Roth, “The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy,” Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 211–407, 2014.
- M. Danisch, O. Balalau, and M. Sozio, “Listing k-cliques in sparse real-world graphs,” in Proc. WWW 2018, pp. 589–598.
- S. Mihara, S. Tsugawa, and H. Ohsaki, “Influence maximization problem for unknown social networks,” in Proc. ASONAM 2015, pp. 1539–1546.
- V. Batagelj and M. Zaversnik, “An o(m) algorithm for cores decomposition of networks,” CoRR, vol. cs.DS/0310049, 2003.
- L. Dhulipala, Q. C. Liu, S. Raskhodnikova, J. Shi, J. Shun, and S. Yu, “Differential privacy from locally adjustable graph algorithms: k-core decomposition, low out-degree ordering, and densest subgraphs,” in IEEE FOCS 2022, pp. 754–765.
- J. Cohen, “Trusses: Cohesive subgraphs for social network analysis,” National security agency technical report, vol. 16, no. 3.1, 2008.
- K. Saito, T. Yamada, and K. Kazama, “Extracting communities from complex networks by the k-dense method,” IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci., vol. 91-A, no. 11, pp. 3304–3311, 2008.
- G. K. Manacher, “Algorithmic graph theory (alan gibbons),” SIAM Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 145–147, 1989.
- J. Hu, X. Wu, R. Cheng, S. Luo, and Y. Fang, “On minimal steiner maximum-connected subgraph queries,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2455–2469, 2017.
- J. Chen, S. Cai, S. Pan, Y. Wang, Q. Lin, M. Zhao, and M. Yin, “Nuqclq: An effective local search algorithm for maximum quasi-clique problem,” in Proc. AAAI 2021, pp. 12 258–12 266.
- K. Wang, W. Zhang, X. Lin, Y. Zhang, and S. Li, “Discovering hierarchy of bipartite graphs with cohesive subgraphs,” in ICDE 2022, pp. 2291–2305.
- K. Wang, G. Zhao, W. Zhang, X. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. He, and C. Li, “Cohesive subgraph discovery over uncertain bipartite graphs,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 2023.
- L. Fan, L. Xiong, and V. Sunderam, “Differentially private multi-dimensional time series release for traffic monitoring,” in Data and Applications Security and Privacy XXVII: 27th Annual IFIP WG 11.3 Conference, DBSec 2013. Proceedings 27, pp. 33–48.
- L. Fan and L. Xiong, “An adaptive approach to real-time aggregate monitoring with differential privacy,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2094–2106, 2014.
- G. Cormode, S. Jha, T. Kulkarni, N. Li, D. Srivastava, and T. Wang, “Privacy at scale: Local differential privacy in practice,” in SIGMOD 2018, pp. 1655–1658.
- Z. Qin, T. Yu, Y. Yang, I. Khalil, X. Xiao, and K. Ren, “Generating synthetic decentralized social graphs with local differential privacy,” in CCS 2017, pp. 425–438.
- J. Imola, T. Murakami, and K. Chaudhuri, “Communication-efficient triangle counting under local differential privacy,” in USENIX Security 2022, pp. 537–554.
- Y. Liu, S. Zhao, Y. Liu, D. Zhao, H. Chen, and C. Li, “Collecting triangle counts with edge relationship local differential privacy,” in ICDE 2022, pp. 2008–2020.
- S. P. Kasiviswanathan, H. K. Lee, K. Nissim, S. Raskhodnikova, and A. D. Smith, “What can we learn privately?” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 793–826, 2011.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.