Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Simulating X-ray absorption spectroscopy of battery materials on a quantum computer

Published 17 May 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.mtrl-sci | (2405.11015v1)

Abstract: X-ray absorption spectroscopy is a crucial experimental technique for elucidating the mechanisms of structural degradation in battery materials. However, extracting information from the measured spectrum is challenging without high-quality simulations. In this work, we propose simulating near-edge X-ray absorption spectra as a promising application for quantum computing. It is attractive due to the ultralocal nature of X-ray absorption that significantly reduces the sizes of problems to be simulated, and because of the classical hardness of simulating spectra. We describe three quantum algorithms to compute the X-ray absorption spectrum and provide their asymptotic cost. One of these is a Monte-Carlo based time-domain algorithm, which is cost-friendly to early fault-tolerant quantum computers. We then apply the framework to an industrially relevant example, a CAS(22e,18o) active space for an O-Mn cluster in a Li-excess battery cathode, showing that practically useful simulations could be obtained with much fewer qubits and gates than ground-state energy estimation of the same material.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Z. Lu and J. R. Dahn, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 149, A815 (2002).
  2. F. De Groot, Chemical Reviews 101, 1779 (2001).
  3. M. B. Hastings, Physical Review B 76, 035114 (2007).
  4. T. Kosugi and Y.-i. Matsushita, Physical Review A 101, 012330 (2020a).
  5. T. Kosugi and Y.-i. Matsushita, Physical Review Research 2, 033043 (2020b).
  6. J. J. Rehr and R. C. Albers, Physical Review B 41, 8139 (1990).
  7. J. J. Rehr and R. C. Albers, Reviews of modern physics 72, 621 (2000).
  8. N. A. Besley and F. A. Asmuruf, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 12, 12024 (2010).
  9. J. Vinson, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 24, 12787 (2022).
  10. D. Casanova and M. Head-Gordon, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11, 9779 (2009).
  11. D. Casanova, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 12, e1561 (2022).
  12. K. Andersson and B. O. Roos, Chemical physics letters 191, 507 (1992).
  13. K. Pierloot, Molecular physics 101, 2083 (2003).
  14. S. R. White, Physical review letters 69, 2863 (1992).
  15. S. R. White, Physical review b 48, 10345 (1993).
  16. G. K.-L. Chan and S. Sharma, Annual review of physical chemistry 62, 465 (2011).
  17. M. Wand and M. Jones, Kernel Smoothing, Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability (60) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1994).
  18. L. Lin and Y. Tong, PRX Quantum 3, 010318 (2022).
  19. A. Barth and L. Cederbaum, Physical Review A 23, 1038 (1981).
  20. P. Norman and A. Dreuw, Chemical reviews 118, 7208 (2018).
  21. M. F. Herbst and T. Fransson, The Journal of Chemical Physics 153 (2020).
  22. Q. Sun, Journal of computational chemistry 36, 1664 (2015).
  23. G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang, Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
  24. A. M. Childs and N. Wiebe, arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.5822  (2012).
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 26 likes about this paper.