Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spectral functions with infinite projected entangled-pair states

Published 17 May 2024 in cond-mat.str-el and quant-ph | (2405.10628v2)

Abstract: Infinite projected entangled-pair states (iPEPS) provide a powerful tool to study two-dimensional strongly correlated systems directly in the thermodynamic limit. In this work, we extend the iPEPS toolbox by a method to efficiently evaluate non-equal time two-point correlators, enabling the computation of spectral functions. It is based on an iPEPS ansatz of the ground state in a large unit cell, with an operator applied in the center of the cell, which is evolved in real-time using the fast-full update method. At every time step, the two-point correlators within a cell are computed based on the corner transfer matrix renormalization group method. Benchmark results for the 2D transverse field Ising model show that the main features of the dynamical structure factor can already be reproduced at relatively small bond dimensions and unit cell sizes. The results for the magnon dispersion are found to be in good agreement with previous data obtained with the iPEPS excitation ansatz.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  2. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Renormalization algorithms for Quantum-Many Body Systems in two and higher dimensions, arXiv:cond-mat/0407066  (2004).
  3. P. Corboz and F. Mila, Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147203 (2014).
  4. I. Niesen and P. Corboz, Emergent Haldane phase in the S=1𝑆1{S}=1italic_S = 1 bilinear-biquadratic Heisenberg model on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 95, 180404(R) (2017).
  5. H.-Y. Lee and N. Kawashima, Spin-one bilinear-biquadratic model on a star lattice, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205123 (2018).
  6. S. S. Jahromi and R. Orús, Spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the star lattice: Competing valence-bond-solid phases studied by means of tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155108 (2018).
  7. J. Hasik, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Investigation of the Néel phase of the frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet by differentiable symmetric tensor networks, SciPost Physics 10, 012 (2021).
  8. B. Ponsioen, S. S. Chung, and P. Corboz, Superconducting stripes in the hole-doped three-band Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205154 (2023).
  9. E. L. Weerda and M. Rizzi, Fractional quantum hall states with variational projected entangled-pair states: a study of the bosonic harper-hofstadter model, arXiv:2309.12811  (2023).
  10. J. Hasik and P. Corboz, Incommensurate order with translationally invariant projected entangled-pair states: Spiral states and quantum spin liquid on the anisotropic triangular lattice, arXiv:2311.05534 [cond-mat]  (2023).
  11. P. Czarnik, A. Francuz, and J. Dziarmaga, Tensor network simulation of the kitaev-heisenberg model at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165147.
  12. O. Gauthé and F. Mila, Thermal Ising Transition in the Spin-1/2121/21 / 2 J1−J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2{J}_{1}-{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Heisenberg Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 227202 (2022).
  13. J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, Post-matrix product state methods: To tangent space and beyond, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075133 (2013b).
  14. L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Simulating excitation spectra with projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165121 (2019).
  15. B. Ponsioen and P. Corboz, Excitations with projected entangled pair states using the corner transfer matrix method, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195109 (2020).
  16. B. Ponsioen, F. Assaad, and P. Corboz, Automatic differentiation applied to excitations with projected entangled pair states, SciPost Physics 12, 006 (2022).
  17. B. Ponsioen, J. Hasik, and P. Corboz, Improved summations of n𝑛nitalic_n-point correlation functions of projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195111.
  18. S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-Time Evolution Using the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004).
  19. R. Verresen, F. Pollmann, and R. Moessner, Quantum dynamics of the square-lattice Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155102 (2018).
  20. R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nat. Phys. 15, 750 (2019).
  21. S.-H. Lin, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Efficient simulation of dynamics in two-dimensional quantum spin systems with isometric tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245102 (2022).
  22. T. Mendes-Santos, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, Highly resolved spectral functions of two-dimensional systems with neural quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 046501 (2023).
  23. P. Czarnik, J. Dziarmaga, and P. Corboz, Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: An efficient algorithm, Phys. Rev. B 99, 035115 (2019).
  24. C. Hubig and J. I. Cirac, Time-dependent study of disordered models with infinite projected entangled pair states, SciPost Physics 6, 031 (2019).
  25. A. Kshetrimayum, M. Goihl, and J. Eisert, Time evolution of many-body localized systems in two spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235132 (2020).
  26. J. Dziarmaga, Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: Neighborhood tensor update, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094411 (2021).
  27. J. Dziarmaga, Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: A gradient tensor update in the tangent space, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014304 (2022).
  28. R. Kaneko and I. Danshita, Tensor-network study of correlation-spreading dynamics in the two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Commun Phys 5, 1 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  29. R. T. Ponnaganti, M. Mambrini, and D. Poilblanc, Tensor network variational optimizations for real-time dynamics: Application to the time-evolution of spin liquids, SciPost Physics 15, 158 (2023).
  30. R. Kaneko and I. Danshita, Dynamics of correlation spreading in low-dimensional transverse-field Ising models, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023301 (2023).
  31. J. Dziarmaga and J. M. Mazur, Tensor network simulation of the quantum Kibble-Zurek quench from the Mott to the superfluid phase in the two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144510 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society.
  32. T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, Corner Transfer Matrix Renormalization Group Method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891 (1996).
  33. R. Orús, A. C. Doherty, and G. Vidal, First Order Phase Transition in the Anisotropic Quantum Orbital Compass Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 077203 (2009).
  34. P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing States in the t-J Model: Uniform d-Wave State versus Stripe State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046402 (2014).
  35. H. C. Jiang, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Accurate Determination of Tensor Network State of Quantum Lattice Models in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008).
  36. P. Corboz, Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 035133 (2016).
  37. M. Lubasch, J. I. Cirac, and M.-C. Bañuls, Unifying projected entangled pair state contractions, New J. Phys. 16, 033014 (2014).
  38. H. W. J. Blöte and Y. Deng, Cluster Monte Carlo simulation of the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066110 (2002).
  39. M. Rader and A. M. Läuchli, Finite Correlation Length Scaling in Lorentz-Invariant Gapless iPEPS Wave Functions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031030 (2018).
  40. I. Pižorn, L. Wang, and F. Verstraete, Time evolution of projected entangled pair states in the single-layer picture, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052321 (2011).
  41. H. N. Phien, G. Vidal, and I. P. McCulloch, Infinite boundary conditions for matrix product state calculations, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245107 (2012).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free