Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimal crawling: from mechanical to chemical actuation

Published 15 May 2024 in cond-mat.soft and physics.bio-ph | (2405.09302v1)

Abstract: Taking inspiration from the crawling motion of biological cells on a substrate, we consider a physical model of self-propulsion where the spatio-temporal driving can involve both, a mechanical actuation by active force couples, and a chemical actuation through controlled mass turnover. We show that the competition and cooperation between these two modalities of active driving can drastically broaden the performance repertoire of the crawler. When the material turnover is slow and the mechanical driving dominates, we find that the highest velocity at a given energetic cost is reached when actuation takes the form of an active force configuration propagating as a traveling wave. As the rate of material turnover increases, and the chemical driving starts to dominate the mechanical one, such a peristalsis-type control progressively loses its efficacy, yielding to a standing wave type driving which involves an interplay between the mechanical and chemical actuation. Our analysis suggests a new paradigm for the optimal design of crawling biomimetic robots where the conventional purely mechanical driving through distributed force actuators is complemented by a distributed chemical control of the material remodeling inside the force-transmitting machinery.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. B. Flaherty, J. McGarry, and P. McHugh, Cell biochemistry and biophysics 49, 14 (2007).
  2. A. Mogilner, Journal of mathematical biology 58, 105 (2009).
  3. I. S. Aranson, Physical models of cell motility (Springer, 2016).
  4. T. Svitkina, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 10, a018267 (2018).
  5. C. Ahn, X. Liang, and S. Cai, Advanced Materials Technologies 4, 10.1002/ADMT.201900185 (2019).
  6. M. A. McEvoy and N. Correll, Science 347, 1261689 (2015).
  7. X. Zhou, C. Majidi, and O. M. O’Reilly, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 74, 7 (2015).
  8. D. Agostinelli, F. Alouges, and A. DeSimone, Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5, 99 (2018).
  9. L. Giraldi and F. Jean, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 58, 1700 (2020).
  10. G. I. Taylor, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 209, 447 (1951).
  11. M. Lighthill, Journal of fluid Mechanics 9, 305 (1960).
  12. E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, Reports on Progress in Physics 72, 096601 (2009).
  13. A. DeSimone and A. Tatone, The European Physical Journal E 35, 85 (2012).
  14. E. M. Purcell, American journal of physics 45, 3 (1977).
  15. A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 198, 557 (1989).
  16. J. E. Avron and O. Raz, New Journal of Physics 10, 063016 (2008).
  17. R. Golestanian and A. Ajdari, Physical Review E 77, 036308 (2008a).
  18. R. Golestanian and A. Ajdari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 038101 (2008b).
  19. F. Alouges, A. DeSimone, and A. Lefebvre, The European Physical Journal E 28, 279 (2009).
  20. A. C. Callan-Jones and R. Voituriez, Current opinion in cell biology 38, 12 (2016).
  21. P. Recho, T. Putelat, and L. Truskinovsky, Physical review letters 111, 108102 (2013).
  22. P. Recho and L. Truskinovsky, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids 21, 263 (2016).
  23. P. Recho, T. Putelat, and L. Truskinovsky, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 84, 469 (2015).
  24. P. Recho, J.-F. Joanny, and L. Truskinovsky, Physical Review Letters 112, 218101 (2014).
  25. S. Santhosh and M. Serra, Physical Review E 106, 024610 (2022).
  26. E. K. Rodriguez, A. Hoger, and A. D. McCulloch, Journal of biomechanics 27, 455 (1994).
  27. A. Goriely, The mathematics and mechanics of biological growth, Vol. 45 (Springer, 2017).
  28. A. Erlich and P. Recho, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 178, 105342 (2023).
  29. S. R. De Groot and P. Mazur, Non-equilibrium thermodynamics (Courier Corporation, 2013).
  30. G. B. Blanchard, J. Étienne, and N. Gorfinkiel, Current opinion in genetics & development 51, 78 (2018).
  31. C. Giverso and L. Preziosi, Physical Review E 98, 062402 (2018).
  32. A. Carlsson, New journal of physics 13, 073009 (2011).
  33. P. Recho and L. Truskinovsky, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081286515588675 21, 263 (2015).
  34. M. J. Lighthill, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 5, 109 (1952), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.3160050201 .
  35. R. García-García, P. Collet, and L. Truskinovsky, Physical Review E 100, 042608 (2019).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.