Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Noether's theorem and Ward-Takahashi identities from homotopy algebras

Published 15 May 2024 in hep-th | (2405.09243v3)

Abstract: We derive the new identity in homotopy algebras which directly corresponds to the Schwinger-Dyson equations in quantum field theory. As an application, we derive the Ward-Takahashi identities. We demonstrate that the Ward-Takahashi identities are reproduced in several examples. In general, our formula contains divergence. We mediate this problem by introducing stubs known in the context of string field theory. With the regularization, we can calculate the anomaly such as axial U(1) anomaly in vector-like U(1) gauge theory.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. J. D. Stasheff, “Homotopy associativity of H𝐻Hitalic_H-spaces. I,” Trans. of the Amer. Math. Soc. 108, 275 (1963).
  2. J. D. Stasheff, “Homotopy associativity of H𝐻Hitalic_H-spaces. II,” Trans. of the Amer. Math. Soc. 108, 293 (1963).
  3. E. Getzler and J. D. S. Jones, “A∞subscript𝐴A_{\infty}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-algebras and the cyclic bar complex,” Illinois J. Math 34, 256 (1990).
  4. M. Markl, “A cohomology theory for A⁢(m)𝐴𝑚A(m)italic_A ( italic_m )-algebras and applications,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra 83, 141 (1992).
  5. M. Penkava and A. S. Schwarz, “A∞subscript𝐴A_{\infty}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT algebras and the cohomology of moduli spaces,” hep-th/9408064.
  6. M. R. Gaberdiel and B. Zwiebach, “Tensor constructions of open string theories. 1: Foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B505, 569 (1997) [hep-th/9705038].
  7. B. Zwiebach, “Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the Batalin-Vilkovisky master equation,” Nucl. Phys. B 390, 33-152 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9206084 [hep-th]].
  8. M. Markl, “Loop homotopy algebras in closed string field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 221, 367-384 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/9711045 [hep-th]].
  9. C. Maccaferri and J. Vošmera, “The classical cosmological constant of open-closed string field theory,” JHEP 10, 173 (2022) [arXiv:2208.00410 [hep-th]].
  10. C. Maccaferri, A. Ruffino and J. Vošmera, “The nilpotent structure of open-closed string field theory,” JHEP 08, 145 (2023) [arXiv:2305.02843 [hep-th]].
  11. H. Kajiura and J. Stasheff, “Homotopy algebras inspired by classical open-closed string field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 263, 553-581 (2006) [arXiv:math/0410291 [math.QA]].
  12. H. Kajiura and J. Stasheff, “Open-closed homotopy algebra in mathematical physics,” J. Math. Phys. 47, 023506 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0510118 [hep-th]].
  13. T. Erler, S. Konopka and I. Sachs, “Resolving Witten‘s superstring field theory,” JHEP 04, 150 (2014) [arXiv:1312.2948 [hep-th]].
  14. T. Erler, Y. Okawa and T. Takezaki, “Complete Action for Open Superstring Field Theory with Cyclic A∞subscript𝐴A_{\infty}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Structure,” JHEP 08, 012 (2016) [arXiv:1602.02582 [hep-th]].
  15. H. Kunitomo and T. Sugimoto, “Heterotic string field theory with cyclic L∞subscript𝐿L_{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT structure,” PTEP 2019, no.6, 063B02 (2019) [arXiv:1902.02991 [hep-th]].
  16. H. Kunitomo, “Open-closed homotopy algebra in superstring field theory,” PTEP 2022, no.9, 093B07 (2022) [arXiv:2204.01249 [hep-th]].
  17. H. Kajiura, “Noncommutative homotopy algebras associated with open strings,” Rev. Math. Phys. 19, 1-99 (2007) [arXiv:math/0306332 [math.QA]].
  18. A. Sen, “Wilsonian Effective Action of Superstring Theory,” JHEP 01, 108 (2017) [arXiv:1609.00459 [hep-th]].
  19. H. Erbin, C. Maccaferri, M. Schnabl and J. Vošmera, “Classical algebraic structures in string theory effective actions,” JHEP 11, 123 (2020) [arXiv:2006.16270 [hep-th]].
  20. D. Koyama, Y. Okawa and N. Suzuki, “Gauge-invariant operators of open bosonic string field theory in the low-energy limit,” [arXiv:2006.16710 [hep-th]].
  21. A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu, “Homotopy Transfer and Effective Field Theory I: Tree-level,” Fortsch. Phys. 70, no.2-3, 2200003 (2022) [arXiv:2007.07942 [hep-th]].
  22. A. S. Arvanitakis, O. Hohm, C. Hull and V. Lekeu, “Homotopy Transfer and Effective Field Theory II: Strings and Double Field Theory,” Fortsch. Phys. 70, no.2-3, 2200004 (2022) [arXiv:2106.08343 [hep-th]].
  23. R. Bonezzi, C. Chiaffrino, F. Diaz-Jaramillo and O. Hohm, “Tree-level Scattering Amplitudes via Homotopy Transfer,” [arXiv:2312.09306 [hep-th]].
  24. S. Konopka, “The S-Matrix of superstring field theory,” JHEP 11, 187 (2015) [arXiv:1507.08250 [hep-th]].
  25. H. Kunitomo, “Tree-level S-matrix of superstring field theory with homotopy algebra structure,” JHEP 03, 193 (2021) [arXiv:2011.11975 [hep-th]].
  26. T. Erler and H. Matsunaga, “Mapping between Witten and lightcone string field theories,” JHEP 11, 208 (2021) [arXiv:2012.09521 [hep-th]].
  27. O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, “L∞subscript𝐿L_{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Algebras and Field Theory,” Fortsch. Phys. 65, no.3-4, 1700014 (2017) [arXiv:1701.08824 [hep-th]].
  28. B. Jurčo, L. Raspollini, C. Sämann and M. Wolf, “L∞subscript𝐿L_{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-Algebras of Classical Field Theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky Formalism,” Fortsch. Phys. 67, no.7, 1900025 (2019) [arXiv:1809.09899 [hep-th]].
  29. A. Nützi and M. Reiterer, “Amplitudes in YM and GR as a Minimal Model and Recursive Characterization,” Commun. Math. Phys. 392, no.2, 427-482 (2022) [arXiv:1812.06454 [math-ph]].
  30. A. S. Arvanitakis, “The L∞subscript𝐿L_{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-algebra of the S-matrix,” JHEP 07, 115 (2019) [arXiv:1903.05643 [hep-th]].
  31. T. Macrelli, C. Sämann and M. Wolf, “Scattering amplitude recursion relations in Batalin-Vilkovisky–quantizable theories,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.4, 045017 (2019) [arXiv:1903.05713 [hep-th]].
  32. B. Jurčo, T. Macrelli, C. Sämann and M. Wolf, “Loop Amplitudes and Quantum Homotopy Algebras,” JHEP 07, 003 (2020) [arXiv:1912.06695 [hep-th]].
  33. C. Saemann and E. Sfinarolakis, “Symmetry Factors of Feynman Diagrams and the Homological Perturbation Lemma,” JHEP 12, 088 (2020) [arXiv:2009.12616 [hep-th]].
  34. Y. Okawa, “Correlation functions of scalar field theories from homotopy algebras,” [arXiv:2203.05366 [hep-th]].
  35. K. Konosu and Y. Okawa, “Correlation functions involving Dirac fields from homotopy algebras I: the free theory,” [arXiv:2305.11634 [hep-th]].
  36. K. Konosu, “Correlation functions involving Dirac fields from homotopy algebras II: the interacting theory,” [arXiv:2305.13103 [hep-th]].
  37. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Gauge Algebra and Quantization,” Phys. Lett. B 102, 27-31 (1981).
  38. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Quantization of Gauge Theories with Linearly Dependent Generators,” Phys. Rev. D 28, 2567-2582 (1983) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 30, 508 (1984)].
  39. A. S. Schwarz, “Geometry of Batalin-Vilkovisky quantization,” Commun. Math. Phys. 155, 249-260 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9205088 [hep-th]].
  40. O. Gwilliam and T. Johnson-Freyd, “How to derive Feynman diagrams for finite-dimensional integrals directly from the BV formalism,” [arXiv:1202.1554 [math-ph]].
  41. C. Chiaffrino, O. Hohm and A. F. Pinto, “Homological quantum mechanics,” JHEP 02, 137 (2024) [arXiv:2112.11495 [hep-th]].
  42. T. Masuda and H. Matsunaga, “Perturbative path-integral of string fields and the A∞subscript𝐴A_{\infty}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT structure of the BV master equation,” PTEP 2022, no.11, 113B04 (2022) [arXiv:2003.05021 [hep-th]].
  43. M. Doubek, B. Jurčo and J. Pulmann, “Quantum L∞subscript𝐿L_{\infty}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Algebras and the Homological Perturbation Lemma,” Commun. Math. Phys. 367, no.1, 215-240 (2019) [arXiv:1712.02696 [math-ph]].
  44. T. Erler, “Supersymmetry in Open Superstring Field Theory,” JHEP 05, 113 (2017) [arXiv:1610.03251 [hep-th]].
  45. H. Matsunaga, “Homotopy algebra & symmetry generators in QFT,” talk in the workshop of Homotopy Algebra of Quantum Field Theory and Its Application, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Japan, March 2021.
  46. M. Schnabl and G. Stettinger, “Open string field theory with stubs,” JHEP 07, 032 (2023) [arXiv:2301.13182 [hep-th]].
  47. H. Erbin and A. H. Fırat, “Open string stub as an auxiliary string field,” [arXiv:2308.08587 [hep-th]].
  48. M. Schnabl and G. Stettinger, “More on stubs in open string field theory,” [arXiv:2402.00308 [hep-th]].
  49. C. Maccaferri, R. Poletti, A. Ruffino and B. Valsesia, “Adding stubs to quantum string field theories,” [arXiv:2403.10471 [hep-th]].
  50. C. Chiaffrino and I. Sachs, “QFT with stubs,” JHEP 06, 120 (2022) [arXiv:2108.04312 [hep-th]].
  51. M. Srednicki, “Quantum Field Theory,” Cambridge University Press (2007).
  52. T. Erler, “Relating Berkovits and A∞ superstring field theories; small Hilbert space perspective,” JHEP 10, 157 (2015) [arXiv:1505.02069 [hep-th]].
  53. M. Crainic, “On the perturbation lemma, and deformations,” [arXiv:math/0403266 [math.AT]].
  54. K. Konosu and Y. Okawa, “Nonperturbative correlation functions from homotopy algebras,” in preparation
  55. K. Costello and O. Gwilliam, “Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory: Volume 1,” Cambridge University Press (2016).
  56. K. Costello and O. Gwilliam, “Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory: Volume 2,” Cambridge University Press (2021).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 11 likes about this paper.