Industrial Application of the Shapley value-based Redispatch Cost Allocation to Large-Scale Power Grids requires AC Optimal Power Flow
Abstract: A burgeoning topic in the current energy transition are the huge costs of redispatch congestion management (CM) in large transmission systems. One of the German transmission system operators (TSOs) raised the critical inquiry of how to allocate the redispatch costs amongst TSOs in an equitable and beneficial way. Previously, a Shapley value-based approach has been introduced on small test grids, using the linear DC approximation of optimal power flow (OPF). However, within the application of CM, its feasibility and accuracy for large-scale power grids and its impact on the computed congestions remain uncertain. Therefore, this study investigates the applicability of the DC OPF compared to the exact AC OPF with regard to the Shapley values, for both small and large-scale grids. Numerical simulation shows significant differences in the congested lines, the overall redispatch costs, and the Shapley values. These findings suggest that for future CM, the TSOs should further investigate AC OPF solutions.
- “Bericht Netzengpassmanagement”, Bundesnetzagentur, 2022.
- E. Algaba, V. Fragnelli, and J. Sánchez-Soriano, “Handbook of the Shapley value,” CRC Press, 2019.
- K. Baker, “Solutions of DC OPF are never AC feasible,” Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, pp. 264-268, 2021.
- S. Frank and S. Rebennack, “An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation and examples,” IIE transactions, vol. 48 (12), pp. 1172-1197, 2016.
- H. Hof̈ling, “Diskussionspapier Investitionsanreize,” 2013.
- H. Kile, K. Uhlen, L. Warland, and G. Kjølle, “A comparison of AC and DC power flow models for contingency and reliability analysis,” 2014.
- A. Sanjab, H. Le Cadre, and Y. Mou, “TSO-DSOs stable cost allocation for the joint procurement of flexibility: A cooperative game approach,” IEEE Transaction on Smart Grid, pp. 4449-4464, 2022.
- A. Vicente-Pastor, J. Nieto-Martin, D. W. Bunn, and A. Laur, “Evaluation of flexibility markets for retailer-DSO-TSO coordination,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24 (3), pp. 2003-2012, 2018.
- A. von Schemde, “Redispatch and Countertrade Costs,” 2020.
- S. Voswinkel, J. Hoc̈kner, A. Khalid, and C. Weber, “Sharing congestion cost management costs among system operators using the Shapley value,” Applied Energy, vol. 317, 2022.
- Z.-Y. Wang and H.-D. Chiang, “On the feasibility of AC and DC optimal power flow models: analytics and comparison,” 2021.
- C. Weber, “NEMO VIII – Lan̈gerfristige Entwicklungspfade und Metastudie zum Netzentwicklungsplan 2021-2035,” 2022.
- yWorks GmbH, 2019.
- EU Commission, “Reform of the Electricity Market Design,” 2023.
- M. G. Pollitt, “Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) for Electricity in Europe? The Untold Story,” University of Cambridge, 2023.
- K. Neuhoff, B. F. Hobbs, D. M. G. Newbery, “Congestion Management in European Power Networks: Criteria to Assess the Available Options,” University of Cambridge & DIW Berlin, Climate Policy Initiative, 2011.
- EU Commission, “Nodal Pricing in the European Internal Electricity Market,” 2020.
- R. Bauer, X. Dai, and V. Hagenmeyer, “A Shapley value-based Distributed AC OPF Approach for Redispatch Congestion Cost Allocation,”, pp. 109–113, 2023.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.