Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Estimating Non-Stabilizerness Dynamics Without Simulating It

Published 9 May 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2405.06054v2)

Abstract: We introduce the Iterative Clifford Circuit Renormalization (ICCR), a novel technique designed to efficiently handle the dynamics of non-stabilizerness (a.k.a. quantum magic) in generic quantum circuits. ICCR iteratively adjusts the starting circuit, transforming it into a Clifford circuit where all elements that can alter the non-stabilizerness, such as measurements or T gates, have been removed. In the process the initial state is renormalized in such a way that the new circuit outputs the same final state as the original one. This approach embeds the complex dynamics of non-stabilizerness in the flow of an effective initial state, enabling its efficient evaluation while avoiding the need for direct and computationally expensive simulation of the original circuit. The initial state renormalization can be computed explicitly using a matrix-product state approximation that can be systematically improved. We implement the ICCR algorithm to evaluate the non-stabilizerness dynamics for systems of size up to N = 1000. We validate our method by comparing it to tensor networks simulations. Finally, we employ the ICCR technique to study a magic purification circuit, where a measurement-induced transition is observed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467 (1982).
  2. W. Kohn, Nobel Lecture: Electronic structure of matter—wave functions and density functionals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1253 (1999).
  3. J. Biamonte, Lectures on Quantum Tensor Networks (2020), arXiv:1912.10049 [quant-ph] .
  4. G. Vidal, Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004).
  5. M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P08024–P08024 (2007).
  6. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011).
  7. B. M. Terhal and D. P. DiVincenzo, Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032325 (2002).
  8. R. Jozsa and A. Miyake, Matchgates and classical simulation of quantum circuits, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 464, 3089–3106 (2008).
  9. J. Surace and L. Tagliacozzo, Fermionic Gaussian states: an introduction to numerical approaches, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 54 (2022).
  10. D. Gottesman, Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction (1997).
  11. D. Gottesman, Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 57, 127 (1998a).
  12. D. Gottesman, The heisenberg representation of quantum computers (1998b), arXiv:quant-ph/9807006 [quant-ph] .
  13. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
  14. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  15. M. Howard and E. Campbell, Application of a Resource Theory for Magic States to Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 090501 (2017).
  16. Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Many-Body Quantum Magic, PRX Quantum 3, 020333 (2022).
  17. X. Turkeshi and P. Sierant, Error-resilience Phase Transitions in Encoding-Decoding Quantum Circuits (2023), arXiv:2308.06321 [quant-ph] .
  18. M. Bejan, C. McLauchlan, and B. Béri, Dynamical Magic Transitions in Monitored Clifford+T Circuits (2023), arXiv:2312.00132 [quant-ph] .
  19. A. F. Mello, G. Lami, and M. Collura, Retrieving non-stabilizerness with Neural Networks (2024), arXiv:2403.00919 [quant-ph] .
  20. G. Lami and M. Collura, Nonstabilizerness via Perfect Pauli Sampling of Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 180401 (2023).
  21. G. Lami and M. Collura, Learning the stabilizer group of a Matrix Product State (2024), arXiv:2401.16481 [quant-ph] .
  22. L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer Renyi Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022).
  23. T. Haug and M. Kim, Scalable Measures of Magic Resource for Quantum Computers, PRX Quantum 4, 010301 (2023).
  24. T. Haug and L. Piroli, Quantifying nonstabilizerness of matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035148 (2023a).
  25. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement, Physical Review X 9, 031009 (2019).
  26. M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements, Physical Review X 10, 041020 (2020).
  27. X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in (2+1)21(2+1)( 2 + 1 )-dimensional hybrid quantum circuits, Physical Review B 102, 014315 (2020).
  28. A. Paviglianiti and A. Silva, Multipartite entanglement in the measurement-induced phase transition of the quantum Ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184302 (2023).
  29. S. F. E. Oliviero, L. Leone, and A. Hamma, Magic-state resource theory for the ground state of the transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. A 106, 042426 (2022b).
  30. T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and nonstabilizerness monotones, Quantum 7, 1092 (2023b).
  31. L. Leone and L. Bittel, Stabilizer entropies are monotones for magic-state resource theory (2024), arXiv:2404.11652 [quant-ph] .
  32. S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Improved Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits Dominated by Clifford Gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250501 (2016).
  33. X. Zhou, D. W. Leung, and I. L. Chuang, Methodology for quantum logic gate construction, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052316 (2000).
  34. We previously removed from 𝒮𝒮\mathcal{S}caligraphic_S all sites i≤r𝑖𝑟i\leq ritalic_i ≤ italic_r corresponding to eigenstates of Z^^𝑍\hat{Z}over^ start_ARG italic_Z end_ARG. Hence, any i∈𝒮𝑖𝒮i\in\mathcal{S}italic_i ∈ caligraphic_S with i≤r𝑖𝑟i\leq ritalic_i ≤ italic_r must correspond to an eigenstate of X^^𝑋\hat{X}over^ start_ARG italic_X end_ARG or Y^^𝑌\hat{Y}over^ start_ARG italic_Y end_ARG.
  35. C. Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
  36. G. Lami, T. Haug, and J. D. Nardis, Quantum State Designs with Clifford Enhanced Matrix Product States (2024), arXiv:2404.18751 [quant-ph] .
  37. M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep thermalization with distinct design times, Quantum 6, 886 (2022).
  38. D. Gross, K. Audenaert, and J. Eisert, Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs, Journal of Mathematical Physics 48, 10.1063/1.2716992 (2007).
  39. A. A. Mele, Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quantum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial (2024), arXiv:2307.08956 [quant-ph] .
  40. E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Minimally entangled typical thermal state algorithms, New Journal of Physics 12, 055026 (2010).
  41. A. J. Ferris and G. Vidal, Perfect sampling with unitary tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165146 (2012).
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 4 likes about this paper.