Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Scalable physical source-to-field inference with hypernetworks

Published 7 May 2024 in cs.LG, cs.CE, and physics.comp-ph | (2405.05981v1)

Abstract: We present a generative model that amortises computation for the field around e.g. gravitational or magnetic sources. Exact numerical calculation has either computational complexity $\mathcal{O}(M\times{}N)$ in the number of sources and field evaluation points, or requires a fixed evaluation grid to exploit fast Fourier transforms. Using an architecture where a hypernetwork produces an implicit representation of the field around a source collection, our model instead performs as $\mathcal{O}(M + N)$, achieves accuracy of $\sim!4\%-6\%$, and allows evaluation at arbitrary locations for arbitrary numbers of sources, greatly increasing the speed of e.g. physics simulations. We also examine a model relating to the physical properties of the output field and develop two-dimensional examples to demonstrate its application. The code for these models and experiments is available at https://github.com/cmt-dtu-energy/hypermagnetics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. magnum.fe: A micromagnetic finite-element simulation code based on fenics. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 345:29–35, 2013. ISSN 0304-8853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.05.051. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885313004022.
  2. Aharoni, A. Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms. Journal of Applied Physics, 83(6):3432–3434, March 1998. ISSN 0021-8979, 1089-7550. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367113.
  3. Accuracy of the analytical demagnetization tensor for various geometries. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 587:171245, 2023.
  4. MagTense: A micromagnetic framework using the analytical demagnetization tensor. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 535:168057, October 2021. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885321003334.
  5. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2024. URL http://github.com/google/jax.
  6. Lagrangian Neural Networks, July 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04630. arXiv:2003.04630 [physics, stat].
  7. The fast multipole method (fmm) for electromagnetic scattering problems. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 40(6):634–641, 1992. doi: 10.1109/8.144597.
  8. Harmonic neural networks. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, Icml’23. JMLR.org, 2023.
  9. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 73(2):325–348, 1987. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021999187901409.
  10. Hamiltonian Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/26cd8ecadce0d4efd6cc8a8725cbd1f8-Abstract.html.
  11. Griffiths, D. Introduction to Electrodynamics. Pearson, 2013. ISBN 9780321856562. URL https://books.google.dk/books?id=AZx_zwEACAAJ.
  12. Hypernetworks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=rkpACe1lx.
  13. Linearly Constrained Neural Networks, April 2021. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01600.
  14. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1999.
  15. Demagnetizing Field in Nonellipsoidal Bodies. Journal of Applied Physics, 36(5):1579–1593, November 1964. ISSN 0021-8979. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703091.
  16. Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6):422–440, May 2021. ISSN 2522-5820. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-021-00314-5.
  17. Equinox: neural networks in JAX via callable PyTrees and filtered transformations. Differentiable Programming workshop at Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, 2021.
  18. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  19. Magtetris: A simulator for fast magnetic field and force calculation for permanent magnet array designs. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 352:107463, 2023.
  20. Müller, E. H. Exact conservation laws for neural network integrators of dynamical systems. Journal of Computational Physics, 488:112234, 2023. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112234. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999123003297.
  21. The magnetic field from a homogeneously magnetized cylindrical tile. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 507:166799, August 2020. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885319342155.
  22. The Stray and Demagnetizing Field of a Homogeneously Magnetized Tetrahedron. IEEE Magnetics Letters, 10:1–5, 2019.
  23. Magpylib: A free python package for magnetic field computation. SoftwareX, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100466.
  24. Magnetic Field Prediction Using Generative Adversarial Networks. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 571:170556, April 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07897.
  25. Random features for large-scale kernel machines. In Platt, J., Koller, D., Singer, Y., and Roweis, S. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 20. Curran Associates, Inc., 2007. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper%5Ffiles/paper/2007/file/013a006f03dbc5392effeb8f18fda755-Paper.pdf.
  26. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, February 2019. ISSN 0021-9991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999118307125.
  27. Neural Conservation Laws: A Divergence-Free Perspective, December 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01741. arXiv:2210.01741 [cs].
  28. Physics-informed machine learning and stray field computation with application to micromagnetic energy minimization. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 576:170761, June 2023. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885323004109.
  29. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:7462–7473, 2020.
  30. Full analytical solution for the magnetic field of uniformly magnetized cylinder tiles. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 559:169482, 2022.
  31. The demagnetizing field of a nonuniform rectangular prism. Journal of Applied Physics, 107(10):103910, May 2010. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3385387.
  32. Hamiltonian Generative Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, April 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=HJenn6VFvB.
  33. Deep sets. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper%5Ffiles/paper/2017/file/f22e4747da1aa27e363d86d40ff442fe-Paper.pdf.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a generative model that leverages hypernetworks to approximate fields with linear scaling over sources and evaluation points.
  • The paper employs a physics-informed design that overcomes traditional FFT and fast multipole method limitations by reducing computational complexity.
  • The paper demonstrates scalability and adaptability in field simulations, promising faster computations for real-time and large-scale physics applications.

Amortized Field Evaluations: Faster Physics Simulations with a New Generative Model

Overview

A recent (but timeless) study introduces a generative model designed to calculate fields around gravitational or magnetic sources more efficiently. Traditional methods for such calculations, like the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Fast Multipole Method, have specific limitations in terms of computational complexity and adaptability. In contrast, the new approach promises significant improvements in speed and flexibility, offering computations that scale linearly with the number of sources and evaluation points.

The Challenge

Fields, such as magnetic or gravitational, are fundamental in physics and crucial for various applications, including renewable energy systems. The challenge lies in accurately and efficiently evaluating these fields, especially when dealing with numerous sources or high-resolution grids. Traditional methods struggle with these scenarios, resulting in prohibitive computational costs.

The generative model introduced in this study tackles this problem head-on, using statistical learning to create a function that can approximate fields generated by any number of sources, regardless of their properties.

Key Innovations

  1. Hypernetworks for Flexibility: The model employs hypernetworks to produce an implicit representation of the field. This approach allows for evaluations at arbitrary locations and for arbitrary numbers of sources.
  2. Linear Scaling: One of the standout features is the model's ability to scale linearly with the number of sources (M) and evaluation points (N). This contrasts sharply with the O(M×N)\mathcal{O}(M \times N) scaling typical of traditional methods.
  3. Physics-Informed Design: The model respects key physical principles, such as the principle of superposition, ensuring that each source contributes to the field in an independent and linear fashion.

Strong Results and Comparisons

Through various experiments, the researchers demonstrated that:

  • The model achieves a remarkable accuracy of around 4%-6%.
  • It can generate accurate field predictions with significantly reduced computational costs compared to traditional methods.
  • It remains effective for varying configurations and numbers of sources, validating its flexibility and scalability.

A key comparison showed that, while a Fourier model informed by physical principles required careful tuning, it still performed on par with more general, fully connected implicit networks (FC INR). On the other hand, the FC + ILR (fully-connected with Implicit Linear Representation) model offered a balanced trade-off in terms of accuracy and ease of training.

Implications

Theoretical Implications

  • Combining Physics and Machine Learning: The integration of physical principles into machine learning models opens new avenues for more efficient simulations. By ensuring that the models adhere to foundational physics laws, we can achieve reliable and interpretable results.
  • Scalability: The linear scalability of the model suggests that similar approaches could be applied to other complex simulations, potentially revolutionizing how we perform large-scale numerical simulations in physics and other fields.

Practical Implications

  • Speeding Up Simulations: Improved computational efficiency means that simulations that were once impractical due to time and resource constraints can now be performed more routinely. This has immediate applications in areas such as materials science, astrophysics, and engineering.
  • Real-Time Applications: Faster simulations open the door to real-time monitoring and control systems, which could be transformational for fields like renewable energy, where real-time data can lead to more effective and adaptive systems.

Future Developments

Looking forward, several exciting possibilities arise:

  1. Extending to 3D: Current demonstrations are in two dimensions, but extending this work to three-dimensional space would significantly broaden the range of applications.
  2. Handling Dynamical Systems: Incorporating this model into time-varying simulations could lead to more robust models for dynamic systems, paving the way for more advanced simulations of evolving physical systems.
  3. Integration with Experimental Data: Further exploration of integrating experimental field data could validate these models' real-world applicability and uncover areas for refinement.

Conclusion

This study presents a significant step forward in the efficient simulation of physical fields. By combining the power of statistical learning with foundational physical principles, the proposed model achieves high accuracy and computational efficiency, making it a promising tool for future scientific and engineering applications. As the field progresses, further developments and refinements will undoubtedly continue to push the boundaries of what is computationally feasible, opening new horizons for both theoretical research and practical applications.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 78 likes about this paper.