Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Lipid-mediated hydrophobic gating in the BK potassium channel

Published 7 May 2024 in q-bio.BM, physics.bio-ph, and physics.chem-ph | (2405.04644v1)

Abstract: The large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel lacks the typical intracellular bundle-crossing gate present in most ion channels of the 6TM family. This observation, initially inferred from Ca${2+}$-free-pore accessibility experiments and recently corroborated by a CryoEM structure of the non-conductive state, raises a puzzling question: how can gating occur in absence of steric hindrance? To answer this question, we carried out molecular simulations and accurate free energy calculations to obtain a microscopic picture of the sequence of events that, starting from a Ca${2+}$-free state leads to ion conduction upon Ca${2+}$ binding. Our results highlight an unexpected role for annular lipids, which turn out to be an integral part of the gating machinery. Due to the presence of fenestrations, the "closed" Ca${2+}$-free pore can be occupied by the methyl groups from the lipid alkyl chains. This dynamic occupancy triggers and stabilizes the nucleation of a vapor bubble into the inner pore cavity, thus hindering ion conduction. By contrast, Ca${2+}$ binding results into a displacement of these lipids outside the inner cavity, lowering the hydrophobicity of this region and thus allowing for pore hydration and conduction. This lipid-mediated hydrophobic gating rationalizes several seemingly problematic experimental observations, including the state-dependent pore accessibility of blockers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. \bibcommenthead
  2. Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of k+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998).
  3. Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a k+ channel–fab complex at 2.0 åresolution. Nature 112 (2001). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/35102009.
  4. BK channels: multiple sensors, one activation gate. Frontiers in Physiology 6, 29 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00029. PMID: 25705194.
  5. Miranda, P. et al. State-dependent fret reports calcium-and voltage-dependent gating-ring motions in bk channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 5217–5222 (2013).
  6. Cadmium–cysteine coordination in the bk inner pore region and its structural and functional implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 5237–5242 (2015).
  7. Charge substitution for a deep-pore residue reveals structural dynamics during BK channel gating. Journal of General Physiology 138, 137–154 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201110632.
  8. Bk channel opening involves side-chain reorientation of multiple deep-pore residues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, E79–E88 (2014).
  9. Wu, Y. et al. Intersubunit coupling in the pore of bk channels*. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 23353–23363 (2009). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925818607641.
  10. Cryo-em structure of the open high-conductance ca2+-activated k+ channel. Nature 541, 46–51 (2017).
  11. State-independent Block of BK Channels by an Intracellular Quaternary Ammonium . Journal of General Physiology 128, 347–364 (2006). URL https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200609579.
  12. Hydrophobic gating in BK channels. Nature Communications 9 (2018).
  13. Structural basis for gating the high-conductance ca2+-activated k+ channel. Nature 541, 52–57 (2017).
  14. Hydrophobic gating in ion channels. Journal of Molecular Biology 427, 121–130 (2015). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283614003970. Understanding Functions and Mechanisms of Ion Channels.
  15. Not ions alone: Barriers to ion permeation in nanopores and channels. Journal of the American Chemical Society 126, 14694–14695 (2004). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ja045271e.
  16. Bubble formation in nanopores: a matter of hydrophobicity, geometry, and size. Advances in Physics: X 5, 1817780 (2020).
  17. Unveiling the gating mechanism of crac channel: a computational study. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 8, 773388 (2021).
  18. Paulo, G. et al. Hydrophobically gated memristive nanopores for neuromorphic applications. Nature Communications 14, 8390 (2023).
  19. A heuristic derived from analysis of the ion channel structural proteome permits the rapid identification of hydrophobic gates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 13989–13995 (2019).
  20. Designing a hydrophobic barrier within biomimetic nanopores. ACS nano 8, 11268–11279 (2014).
  21. Hydrophobic gating in bundle-crossing ion channels: a case study of trpv4. Communications Biology 6 (2023).
  22. Water in nanopores and biological channels: A molecular simulation perspective. Chemical Reviews 120, 10298–10335 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00830.
  23. Central cavity dehydration as a gating mechanism of potassium channels. Nature Communications 14, 2178 (2023).
  24. Molecular structures of the human slo1 k+superscript𝑘k^{+}italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT channel in complex with β⁢4𝛽4\beta 4italic_β 4. eLife 8, e51409 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51409.
  25. Charmm-gui: A web-based graphical user interface for charmm. Journal of Computational Chemistry 29, 1859–1865 (2008). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcc.20945.
  26. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. Journal of Applied Physics 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
  27. Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Molecular Physics 50, 1055–1076 (1983). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978300102851.
  28. Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Molecular Physics 52, 255–268 (1984). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978400101201.
  29. Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695.
  30. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. jcp 103, 8577–8593 (1995).
  31. Brooks, B. R. et al. Charmm: the biomolecular simulation program. Journal of computational chemistry 30, 1545–1614 (2009).
  32. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 926–935 (1983). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869.
  33. Hole: A program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. Journal of Molecular Graphics 14, 354–360 (1996). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026378559700009X.
  34. VMD – Visual Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics 14, 33–38 (1996).
  35. A temperature accelerated method for sampling free energy and determining reaction pathways in rare events simulations. Chemical physics letters 426, 168–175 (2006).
  36. Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with namd. Journal of computational chemistry 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
  37. Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations. Molecular Physics 111, 3345–3362 (2013).
  38. Water model tuning for improved reproduction of rotational diffusion and nmr spectral density. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 116, 6279–6287 (2012).
  39. Surface tension of the most popular models of water by using the test-area simulation method. The Journal of chemical physics 126 (2007).
  40. Debiec, K. T. et al. Further along the road less traveled: Amber ff15ipq, an original protein force field built on a self-consistent physical model. Journal of chemical theory and computation 12, 3926–3947 (2016).
  41. Dickson, C. J. et al. Lipid14: the amber lipid force field. Journal of chemical theory and computation 10, 865–879 (2014).
  42. Charmm36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to nmr data. Journal of computational chemistry 34, 2135–2145 (2013).
  43. Carrasquel-Ursulaez, W. et al. Hydrophobic interaction between contiguous residues in the S6 transmembrane segment acts as a stimuli integration node in the BK channel. Journal of General Physiology 145, 61–74 (2014).
  44. Fan, C. et al. Ball-and-chain inactivation in a calcium-gated potassium channel. Nature 580, 288–293 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2116-0.
  45. Cassie–baxter and wenzel states on a nanostructured surface: phase diagram, metastabilities, and transition mechanism by atomistic free energy calculations. Langmuir 28, 10764–10772 (2012).
  46. Voltage controlled iontronic switches: a computational method to predict electrowetting in hydrophobically gated nanopores. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials 1–21 (2024).
  47. Coupling between voltage sensor activation, ca2+ binding and channel opening in large conductance (bk) potassium channels. Journal of General Physiology 120, 267–305 (2002). Erratum in: J Gen Physiol. 2002 Oct;120(4):599. PMID: 12198087; PMCID: PMC2229516.
  48. Structural determinants of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (pip2) regulation of bk channel activity through the rck1 ca2+ coordination site. Journal of Biological Chemistry 289, 18860–18872 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.538033. Doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.538033.
  49. Calcium-driven regulation of voltage-sensing domains in bk channels. eLife 8, e44934 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44934.
  50. Molecular mechanism of BK channel activation by the smooth muscle relaxant NS11021. Journal of General Physiology 152, e201912506 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201912506.
  51. Large-conductance ca¡sup¿2+¡/sup¿- and voltage-gated k¡sup¿+¡/sup¿ channels form and break interactions with membrane lipids during each gating cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 8591–8596 (2019). URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1901381116.
  52. Di Rienzo, L. et al. Characterizing hydropathy of amino acid side chain in a protein environment by investigating the structural changes of water molecules network. Frontiers in molecular biosciences 8, 626837 (2021).
  53. Mdanalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 32, 2319–2327 (2011).
  54. Gowers, R. J. et al. Mdanalysis: A python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations 98–105 (2016).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.