Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Bias and Its Reduction via Standardization in Discretized Electromagnetic Source Localization Problems

Published 7 May 2024 in math.OC | (2405.04409v2)

Abstract: In electromagnetic source localization problems stemming from linearized Poisson-type equation, the aim is to locate the sources within a domain that produce given measurements on the boundary. In this type of problem, biasing of the solution is one of the main causes of mislocalization. A technique called standardization was developed to reduce biasing. However, the lack of a mathematical foundation for this method can cause difficulties in its application and confusion regarding the reliability of solutions. Here, we give a rigorous and generalized treatment for the technique using the Bayesian framework to shed light on the technique's abilities and limitations. In addition, we take a look at the noise robustness of the method, which is widely reported in numerical studies. The paper starts by giving a gentle introduction to the problem and its bias and works its way toward standardization.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 5(1):25–25, 2008.
  2. Conditionally Gaussian Hypermodels for Cerebral Source Localization. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(3):879–909, 2009.
  3. Solving the Electrocardiography Inverse Problem by Using an Optimal Algorithm Based on the Total Least Squares Theory. In Third International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC 2007), volume 5, pages 115–119. IEEE, 2007.
  4. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 13(1-3):247–276, 1967.
  5. T.C Johnson and D Wellman. Accurate modelling and inversion of electrical resistivity data in the presence of metallic infrastructure with known location and dimension. Geophysical journal international, 202(2):1096–1108, 2015.
  6. Progress of electrical resistance tomography application in oil and gas reservoirs for development dynamic monitoring. Processes, 11(10):2950–, 2023.
  7. EEG/MEG Source Reconstruction: Textbook for Electro- And Magnetoencephalography. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, 2022.
  8. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG. Medical engineering & physics, 24(6):403–418, 2002.
  9. Realistic and Spherical Head Modeling for EEG Forward Problem Solution: A Comparative Cortex-Based Analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2010:972060–11, 2010.
  10. Finite-Element-Based Discretization and Regularization Strategies for 3D Inverse Electrocardiography. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 58(6):1827–1838, 2011.
  11. Least angle regression. The Annals of statistics, 32(2):407–451, 2004.
  12. Linear and Nonlinear Current Density Reconstructions. Journal of clinical neurophysiology, 16(3):267–295, 1999.
  13. Adaptive Spatial Filters for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging. Series in Biomedical Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1st ed. 2008. edition, 2008.
  14. R D Pascual-Marqui. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology, 24:5–12, 2002.
  15. Validating EEG, MEG and combined MEG and EEG beamforming for an estimation of the epileptogenic zone in focal cortical dysplasia. Brain sciences, 12(1):114–, 2022.
  16. In silico study of the effects of cerebral circulation on source localization using a dynamical anatomical atlas of the human head. Journal of neural engineering, 20(2):26005–, 2023.
  17. Jari. Kaipio and E. Somersalo. Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 160. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1st ed. 2005. edition, 2005.
  18. Interpreting magnetic fields on the brain: minimum norm estimates. Medical & biological engineering & computing, 32(1):35–42, 1994.
  19. Maximum principles in differential equations. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.), 1967.
  20. Jürgen. Jost. Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 214. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2nd ed. 2007. edition, 2007.
  21. A Weighting Matrix to Remove Depth Bias in the Linear Biomagnetic Inverse Problem with Application to Cardiology. In Cheryl J. Aine, Gerhard Stroink, Charles C. Wood, Yoshio Okada, and Stephen J. Swithenby, editors, Biomag 96, pages 197–200, New York, NY, 2000. Springer New York.
  22. Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study. PloS one, 8(3):e59856–e59856, 2013.
  23. Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 369(1952):3768–3784, 2011.
  24. Weighted sparsity regularization for source identification for elliptic PDEs. Journal of inverse and ill-posed problems, 31(5):687–709, 2023.
  25. Meijian An. A simple method for determining the spatial resolution of a general inverse problem. Geophysical journal international, 191(2):849–864, 2012.
  26. The Resolving Power of Gross Earth Data. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16(2):169–205, 1968.
  27. Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Human brain mapping, 5(6):454–467, 1997.
  28. Electromagnetic source imaging: Backus-Gilbert resolution spread function-constrained and functional MRI-guided spatial filtering. Human brain mapping, 29(6):627–643, 2008.
  29. Meijian An. On Resolution Matrices. Pure and applied geophysics, 180(1):111–143, 2023.
  30. Roberto D Pascual-Marqui. Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization. arXiv.org, 2007.
  31. Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 25(4):1056–1067, 2005.
  32. sLORETA allows reliable distributed source reconstruction based on subdural strip and grid recordings. Human brain mapping, 33(5):1172–1188, 2012.
  33. Evaluation of spatial resolution and noise sensitivity of sLORETA method for EEG source localization using low-density headsets. Biomedical physics & engineering express, 1(4):45206–, 2015.
  34. Inverse modeling in magnetic source imaging: Comparison of MUSIC, SAM(g2), and sLORETA to interictal intracranial EEG. Human brain mapping, 34(9):2032–2044, 2013.
  35. Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low‐density EEG. Epilepsia open, 4(2):281–292, 2019.
  36. Interictal spike localization for epilepsy surgery using magnetoencephalography beamforming. Clinical neurophysiology, 132(4):928–937, 2021.
  37. Evaluation of sLORETA in the presence of noise and multiple sources. Brain topography, 16(4):277–280, 2004.
  38. Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex. PloS one, 17(3):e0266107–e0266107, 2022.
  39. Analysis of the dynamics and origin of epileptic activity in patients with tuberous sclerosis evaluated for surgery of epilepsy. Clinical neurophysiology, 119(4):853–861, 2008.
  40. A Björck. A Schur method for the square root of a matrix. Linear algebra and its applications, 52-53(1):127–140, 1983.
  41. Standardized kalman filtering for time serial source localization of simultaneous subcortical and cortical brain activity. www.techrxiv.org/722443/UqPLPdTHCJ-oxYE2bCoI6Q, 2024.
  42. Effects of inverse methods and spike phases on interictal high-density EEG source reconstruction. Clinical neurophysiology, 156:4–13, 2023.
  43. Inducing sparsity via the horseshoe prior in imaging problems. Inverse problems, 39(7):74001–, 2023.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free