Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Feature Map Convergence Evaluation for Functional Module

Published 7 May 2024 in cs.AI and cs.CV | (2405.04041v1)

Abstract: Autonomous driving perception models are typically composed of multiple functional modules that interact through complex relationships to accomplish environment understanding. However, perception models are predominantly optimized as a black box through end-to-end training, lacking independent evaluation of functional modules, which poses difficulties for interpretability and optimization. Pioneering in the issue, we propose an evaluation method based on feature map analysis to gauge the convergence of model, thereby assessing functional modules' training maturity. We construct a quantitative metric named as the Feature Map Convergence Score (FMCS) and develop Feature Map Convergence Evaluation Network (FMCE-Net) to measure and predict the convergence degree of models respectively. FMCE-Net achieves remarkable predictive accuracy for FMCS across multiple image classification experiments, validating the efficacy and robustness of the introduced approach. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first independent evaluation method for functional modules, offering a new paradigm for the training assessment towards perception models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. A. Kuznietsov, B. Gyevnar, C. Wang, S. Peters, and S. V. Albrecht, “Explainable ai for safe and trustworthy autonomous driving: A systematic review,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10086, 2024.
  2. É. Zablocki, H. Ben-Younes, P. Pérez, and M. Cord, “Explainability of deep vision-based autonomous driving systems: Review and challenges,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 130, no. 10, pp. 2425–2452, 2022.
  3. C. Yang, Y. Chen, H. Tian, C. Tao, X. Zhu, Z. Zhang, G. Huang, H. Li, Y. Qiao, L. Lu, et al., “Bevformer v2: Adapting modern image backbones to bird’s-eye-view recognition via perspective supervision,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 17 830–17 839.
  4. C. Pan, B. Yaman, S. Velipasalar, and L. Ren, “Clip-bevformer: Enhancing multi-view image-based bev detector with ground truth flow,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08919, 2024.
  5. J. Andreas, M. Rohrbach, T. Darrell, and D. Klein, “Neural module networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 39–48.
  6. M. K. Patrick, A. F. Adekoya, A. A. Mighty, and B. Y. Edward, “Capsule networks–a survey,” Journal of King Saud University-computer and information sciences, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1295–1310, 2022.
  7. C. Fernando, D. Banarse, C. Blundell, Y. Zwols, D. Ha, A. A. Rusu, A. Pritzel, and D. Wierstra, “Pathnet: Evolution channels gradient descent in super neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08734, 2017.
  8. K. Park and D.-H. Kim, “Accelerating image classification using feature map similarity in convolutional neural networks,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 108, 2018.
  9. S. Azam, S. Montaha, K. U. Fahim, A. R. H. Rafid, M. S. H. Mukta, and M. Jonkman, “Using feature maps to unpack the cnn ‘black box’theory with two medical datasets of different modality,” Intelligent Systems with Applications, vol. 18, p. 200233, 2023.
  10. I. M. Rahman, C. Hollitt, and M. Zhang, “Feature map quality score estimation through regression,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1793–1808, 2017.
  11. W. Chen, C. Cong, and L. Huang, “Feature purity: A quantitative evaluation metric for feature extraction in convolutional neural networks,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2010, no. 1.   IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012033.
  12. Y. Zhao and H. Zhang, “Quantitative performance assessment of cnn units via topological entropy calculation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.09716, 2021.
  13. R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, pp. 618–626.
  14. K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman, “Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6034, 2013.
  15. A. Chattopadhay, A. Sarkar, P. Howlader, and V. N. Balasubramanian, “Grad-cam++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks,” in 2018 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV).   IEEE, 2018, pp. 839–847.
  16. H. Mankodiya, D. Jadav, R. Gupta, S. Tanwar, W.-C. Hong, and R. Sharma, “Od-xai: Explainable ai-based semantic object detection for autonomous vehicles,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 5310, 2022.
  17. Q. Zheng, Z. Wang, J. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Shap-cam: Visual explanations for convolutional neural networks based on shapley value,” in European Conference on Computer Vision.   Springer, 2022, pp. 459–474.
  18. W. Shi, G. Huang, S. Song, Z. Wang, T. Lin, and C. Wu, “Self-supervised discovering of interpretable features for reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 2712–2724, 2020.
  19. R. Wang, X. Wang, and D. I. Inouye, “Shapley explanation networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02297, 2021.
  20. D. Wang, J. Wen, Y. Wang, X. Huang, and F. Pei, “End-to-end self-driving using deep neural networks with multi-auxiliary tasks,” Automotive Innovation, vol. 2, pp. 127–136, 2019.
  21. Y. Kim, S. Kim, S. Sim, J. W. Choi, and D. Kum, “Boosting monocular 3d object detection with object-centric auxiliary depth supervision,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1801–1813, 2022.
  22. P. Zheng, H. Fu, D.-P. Fan, Q. Fan, J. Qin, Y.-W. Tai, C.-K. Tang, and L. Van Gool, “Gconet+: A stronger group collaborative co-salient object detector,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.