Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Modeling non stationary noise in pulsar timing array data analysis

Published 6 May 2024 in astro-ph.HE and gr-qc | (2405.03295v1)

Abstract: Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) collaborations recently reported evidence for the presence of a gravitational wave background (GWB) in their datasets. The main candidate that is expected to produce such a GWB is the population of supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHB). Some analyses showed that the recovered signal may exhibit time-dependent properties, i.e. non-stationarity. In this paper, we propose an approximated non-stationary Gaussian process (GP) model obtained from the perturbation of stationary processes. The presented method is applied to the second data release of the European pulsar timing array to search for non-stationary features in the GWB. We analyzed the data in different time slices and showed that the inferred properties of the GWB evolve with time. We find no evidence for such non-stationary behavior and the Bayes factor in favor of the latter is $\mathcal{B}{NS}_{S} = 1.5$. We argue that the evolution of the GWB properties most likely comes from the \mf{improvement of the observation cadence} with time and \mf{better} characterization of the noise of individual pulsars. Such non-stationary GWB could also be produced by the leakage of non-stationary features in the noise of individual pulsars or by the presence of an eccentric single source.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. E. S. Phinney, “A practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,”  (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028 [astro-ph] .
  2. B. Allen and J. D. Romano, Physical Review D 108 (2023), 10.1103/physrevd.108.043026.
  3. G. Agazie et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L8 (2023).
  4. D. J. Reardon et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L6 (2023a).
  5. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023a), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE] .
  6. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A48 (2023b).
  7. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A49 (2023c), arXiv:2306.16225 [astro-ph.HE] .
  8. J. Ellis and N. Cornish, Physical Review D 93 (2016), 10.1103/physrevd.93.084048.
  9. N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124038 (2020).
  10. R. van Haasteren and M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D 90, 104012 (2014a).
  11. C. E. Rasmussen, “Gaussian processes in machine learning,” in Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, edited by O. Bousquet, U. von Luxburg,  and G. Rätsch (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004) pp. 63–71.
  12. R. van Haasteren and M. Vallisneri, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446, 1170 (2014b), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/446/2/1170/13767575/stu2157.pdf .
  13. M. B. Priestley, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 27, 204 (1965).
  14. H. Hong, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 190, 110131 (2023).
  15. Y.-L. K. Samo and S. Roberts, “Generalized spectral kernels,”  (2015), arXiv:1506.02236 [stat.ML] .
  16. G. Agazie and other, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L10 (2023).
  17. D. J. Reardon et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L7 (2023b).
  18. J. Ellis and R. van Haasteren, “jellis18/ptmcmcsampler: Official release,”  (2017).
  19. J. Skilling, Bayesian Analysis 1, 833 (2006).
  20. J. A. Ellis, M. Vallisneri, S. R. Taylor,  and P. T. Baker, “Enterprise: Enhanced numerical toolbox enabling a robust pulsar inference suite,” Zenodo (2020).
  21. Lentati, L. et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453, 2576 (2015), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/453/3/2576/4900884/stv1538.pdf .
  22. Agazie, Gabriella et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 951, L10 (2023).
  23. M. T. Lam, Research Notes of the AAS 5, 167 (2021).
  24. J. Singha et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 507, L57 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-pdf/507/1/L57/54645627/slab098.pdf .
  25. L. Lentati et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458, 2161 (2016), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/458/2/2161/18241404/stw395.pdf .
  26. R. M. Shannon et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 828, L1 (2016).
  27. W. A. Coles et al., The Astrophysical Journal 808, 113 (2015).
  28. P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
  29. S. R. Taylor, P. T. Baker, J. S. Hazboun, J. Simon,  and S. J. Vigeland, “enterprise extensions,”  (2021), v2.4.3.
  30. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA),   (2023d), arXiv:2306.16226 [astro-ph.HE] .
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.