Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

SOPA: A Framework for Sustainability-Oriented Process Analysis and Re-design in Business Process Management

Published 2 May 2024 in cs.SE | (2405.01176v3)

Abstract: Given the continuous global degradation of the Earth's ecosystem due to unsustainable human activity, it is increasingly important for enterprises to evaluate the effects they have on the environment. Consequently, assessing the impact of business processes on sustainability is becoming an important consideration in the discipline of Business Process Management (BPM). However, existing practical approaches that aim at a sustainability-oriented analysis of business processes provide only a limited perspective on the environmental impact caused. Further, they provide no clear and practically applicable mechanism for sustainability-driven process analysis and re-design. Following a design science methodology, we here propose and study SOPA, a framework for sustainability-oriented process analysis and re-design. SOPA extends the BPM life cycle by use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for sustainability analysis in combination with Activity-based Costing (ABC). We evaluate SOPA and its usefulness with a case study, by means of an implementation to support the approach, thereby also illustrating the practical applicability of this work.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. \bibcommenthead
  2. Bauer S (2008) Leitbild der Nachhaltigen Entwicklung — bpb. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung
  3. Brundtland GH (1987) Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environmental Conservation 14(4):291–294. 10.1017/S0376892900016805
  4. Elkington J (1998) ACCOUNTING FOR THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE. Measuring Business Excellence 2(3):18–22. 10.1108/eb025539
  5. Ellram LM (1993) A Framework for Total Cost of Ownership. The International Journal of Logistics Management 4(2):49–60. 10.1108/09574099310804984
  6. European Commission (2014) Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups
  7. Feola G (2020) Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: Time for a critical turn? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35:241–250. 10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005
  8. Freitas AP, Pereira JLM (2015) Process simulation support in BPM tools: The case of BPMN
  9. Goedkoop M (2007) The Eco-indicator 99 Methodology. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan 3(1):32–38. 10.3370/lca.3.32
  10. Herring H (2006) Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy 31(1):10–20. 10.1016/j.energy.2004.04.055
  11. Hueting R, Reijnders L (2004) Broad sustainability contra sustainability: The proper construction of sustainability indicators. Ecological Economics 50(3-4):249–260. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.031
  12. IEEE (2016) IEEE Standard for eXtensible Event Stream (XES) for Achieving Interoperability in Event Logs and Event Streams. 10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7740858
  13. ISO (2006) ISO 14040: 2006 - Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. ISO
  14. Lee TR, Kao JS (2001) Application of simulation technique to activity-based costing of agricultural systems: A case study. Agricultural Systems 67(2):71–82. 10.1016/s0308-521x(00)00042-1
  15. Mansar SL, Reijers HA (2005) Best practices in business process redesign: Validation of a redesign framework. Computers in Industry 56(5):457–471. 10.1016/j.compind.2005.01.001
  16. OMG (2011) Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0
  17. Roohy Gohar S, Indulska M (2020) Environmental Sustainability through Green Business Process Management. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 24. 10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2057
  18. Schneidewind U, Zahrnt A (2014) The institutional framework for a sufficiency driven economy. Ökologisches Wirtschaften - Fachzeitschrift 29(3):30. 10.14512/OEW290330
  19. Shove E (2018) What is wrong with energy efficiency? Building Research & Information 46(7):779–789. 10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746
  20. van der Kolk B (2022) Numbers Speak for Themselves, or Do They? On Performance Measurement and Its Implications. Business & Society 61(4):813–817. 10.1177/00076503211068433
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.