Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Overidentification in Shift-Share Designs

Published 25 Apr 2024 in econ.EM | (2404.17049v1)

Abstract: This paper studies the testability of identifying restrictions commonly employed to assign a causal interpretation to two stage least squares (TSLS) estimators based on Bartik instruments. For homogeneous effects models applied to short panels, our analysis yields testable implications previously noted in the literature for the two major available identification strategies. We propose overidentification tests for these restrictions that remain valid in high dimensional regimes and are robust to heteroskedasticity and clustering. We further show that homogeneous effect models in short panels, and their corresponding overidentification tests, are of central importance by establishing that: (i) In heterogenous effects models, interpreting TSLS as a positively weighted average of treatment effects can impose implausible assumptions on the distribution of the data; and (ii) Alternative identifying strategies relying on long panels can prove uninformative in short panel applications. We highlight the empirical relevance of our results by examining the viability of Bartik instruments for identifying the effect of rising Chinese import competition on US local labor markets.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Shift-share designs: Theory and inference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134 1949–2010.
  2. Andrews, D. (1988). Laws of large numbers for dependent non-identically distributed random variables. Econometric Theory, 4 458–467.
  3. The china syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the united states. American economic review, 103 2121–68.
  4. A two-step method for testing many moment inequalities. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40 1070–1080.
  5. Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI.
  6. Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Wiley.
  7. Yregional evolutions, brooking papers on economic activity. Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 23 76.
  8. When is tsls actually late? Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.
  9. Quasi-experimental shift-share research designs. The Review of Economic Studies, 89 181–213.
  10. Breiman, L. (1968). Probability. Classics in Applied Mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  11. Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19 22–64.
  12. Testing overidentifying restrictions with many instruments and heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 178 15–21.
  13. Overidentification in regular models. Econometrica, 86 1771–1817.
  14. Improved central limit theorem and bootstrap approximations in high dimensions. The Annals of Statistics, 50 2562–2586.
  15. de Jong, R. M. (1996). A strong law of large numbers for triangular mixingale arrays. Statistics & Probability Letters, 27 1–9.
  16. de Jong, R. M. (1997). Central limit theorems for dependent heterogeneous random variables. Econometric Theory, 13 353–367.
  17. Diamond, R. (2016). The determinants and welfare implications of us workers’ diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000. American Economic Review, 106 479–524.
  18. Dudley, R. (1989). Real Analysis and Probability. Wadswort & Brooks Cole.
  19. Eagleson, G. K. (1975). Martingale convergence to mixtures of infinitely divisible laws. The Annals of Probability, 3 557–562.
  20. Bartik instruments: What, when, why, and how. American Economic Review, 110 2586–2624.
  21. Estimation with Aggregate Shocks. The Review of Economic Studies, 87 1365–1398.
  22. Joint time-series and cross-section limit theory under mixingale assumptions. Econometric Theory, 38 942–958.
  23. Halmos, P. (1976). Measure Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer New York.
  24. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62 467–475.
  25. Kolesar, M. (2013). Estimation in an instrumental variables model with treatment effect heterogeneity. Tech. rep., Princeton University.
  26. Mammen, E. (1993). Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. The Annals of Statistics, 21 255–285.
  27. McLeish, D. L. (1975). A Maximal Inequality and Dependent Strong Laws. The Annals of Probability, 3 829 – 839.
  28. Topalova, P. (2010). Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from india. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 1–41.
  29. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: with Applications to Statistics. Springer, New York.
  30. Inference on causal and structural parameters using many moment inequalities. The Review of Economic Studies, 86 1867–1900.
  31. Exponential and moment inequalities for u-statistics. In High Dimensional Probability II. Springer, 13–38.
  32. Moulton, B. R. (1986). Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. Journal of econometrics, 32 385–397.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.