Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Birefringent spin-photon interface generates polarization entanglement

Published 24 Apr 2024 in quant-ph, cond-mat.mes-hall, and physics.optics | (2404.16025v1)

Abstract: A spin-photon interface based on the luminescence of a singly charged quantum dot in a micropillar cavity allows for the creation of photonic entangled states. Current devices suffer from cavity birefringence, which limits the generation of spin-photon entanglement. In this paper, we theoretically study the light absorption and emission by the interface with an anisotropic cavity and derive the maximal excitation and spin-photon entanglement conditions. We show that the concurrence of the spin-photon state equal to one and complete quantum dot population inversion can be reached for a micropillar cavity with any degree of birefringence by tuning the quantum dot resonance strictly between the cavity modes. This sweet spot is also valid for generating a multiphoton cluster state, as we demonstrate by calculating the three-tangle and fidelity with the maximally entangled state.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. M. I. Dyakonov, ed., Spin physics in semiconductors (Springer International Publishing AG, Berlin, 2017).
  2. S. Bar-Ad and I. Bar-Joseph, Absorption quantum beats of magnetoexcitons in GaAs heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2491 (1991).
  3. P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nat. Nanotech. 12, 1026 (2017).
  4. P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton, A deterministic source of single photons, Phys. Today 75, 44 (2022).
  5. Z. McIntyre and W. A. Coish, Non-Markovian transient spectroscopy in cavity QED, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042039 (2022).
  6. N. H. Lindner and T. Rudolph, Proposal for Pulsed On-Demand Sources of Photonic Cluster State Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 113602 (2009).
  7. M. M. Glazov, Electron and Nuclear Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018).
  8. N. V. Leppenen, L. Lanco, and D. S. Smirnov, Quantum Zeno effect and quantum nondemolition spin measurement in a quantum dot–micropillar cavity in the strong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045413 (2021).
  9. K. Mølmer, Y. Castin, and J. Dalibard, Monte Carlo wave-function method in quantum optics, JOSA B 10, 524 (1993).
  10. H. Carmichael, An open system approach to quantum optics (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
  11. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013).
  12. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Distributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
  13. F. Verstraete, M. Popp, and J. I. Cirac, Entanglement versus Correlations in Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027901 (2004).
  14. F. Verstraete and H. Verschelde, Fidelity of mixed states of two qubits, Phys. Rev. A 66, 022307 (2002).
  15. A. Miranowicz and A. Grudka, Ordering two-qubit states with concurrence and negativity, Phys. Rev. A 70, 032326 (2004).
  16. D. Walls and G. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008).
  17. N. V. Leppenen and D. S. Smirnov, Optical measurement of electron spins in quantum dots: quantum Zeno effects, Nanoscale 14, 13284 (2022).
  18. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1975).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.