Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The extended Lipkin model: proposal for implementation in a quantum platform and machine learning analysis of its phase diagram

Published 23 Apr 2024 in quant-ph and nucl-th | (2404.15558v1)

Abstract: We investigate the Extended Lipkin Model (ELM), whose phase diagram mirrors that of the Interacting Boson Approximation model (IBA). Unlike the standard Lipkin model, the ELM (as the IBA) features both first- and second-order quantum shape phase transitions depending on the model parameters. Our goal is to implement the ELM on a quantum platform, leveraging Machine Learning techniques to identify its quantum phase transitions and critical lines. To achieve this, we offer: i) ground state energy calculations using a variational quantum eigensolver; ii) a detailed formulation for ELM dynamics within quantum computing, facilitating experimental exploration of the IBA phase diagram; and iii) a phase diagram determination using various Machine Learning methods. We successfully replicate the ELM ground-state energy using the Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Pseudo-Trotter ansatz Variational Quantum Eigensolver (ADAPT-VQE) algorithm across the entire phase space. Our framework ensures ELM implementation on quantum platforms with controlled errors. Lastly, our ML predictions yield a meaningful phase diagram for the model. Keywords: Quantum Platforms Nuclear Models ADAPT-VQE Quantum Shape Phase Transitions Interacting Boson Approximation Extended Lipkin Model Machine Learning

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (71)
  1. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1969).
  2. H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, 1971).
  3. H. Nishimori and G. Ortiz, Elements of Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, 2010).
  4. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
  5. M. Vojta, “Quantum phase transitions,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 2069 (2003).
  6. L. Carr, ed., Understanding quantum phase transitions, Condensed Matter Physics (CRC Press, 2010).
  7. C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen, T. Brydges, M.K. Joshi, P. Jurcevic, C.A. Muschik, P. Silvi, R. Blatt, C.F. Roos,  and P. Zoller, “Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models,” Nature 569, 355–360 (2019).
  8. C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, N. Klco,  and M. J. Savage, “Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 420–432 (2023).
  9. B. Fauseweh, “Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges,” Nat. Commun. 15, 2013 (2024).
  10. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico,  and A. Kitaev, “Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003).
  11. H. Song, S. Luo,  and S. Fu, “Quantum criticality from Fisher information,” Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 1–14 (2017).
  12. C.-C. Liu, D. Wang, W.-Y. Sun,  and L. Ye, “Quantum Fisher information, quantum entanglement and correlation close to quantum critical phenomena,” Quantum Inf. Process. 16, 1–15 (2017).
  13. F. Iachello and N. V. Zamfir, “Quantum phase transitions in mesoscopic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 212501 (2004).
  14. F. Iachello and A. Arima, The interacting boson model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
  15. R. F. Casten, “Status of Experimental Tests of the IBA,” in Interacting Bose-Fermi Systems in Nuclei, edited by F. Iachello (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1981) pp. 3–20.
  16. R. W. Richardson, “Exactly Solvable Many‐Boson Model,” J. Math. Phys. 9, 1327–1343 (1968).
  17. J. Dukelsky and P. Schuck, “Condensate fragmentation in a new exactly solvable model for confined bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4207–4210 (2001).
  18. J. Dukelsky and S. Pittel, “New mechanism for the enhancement of 𝑠𝑑𝑠𝑑\mathit{sd}italic_sd dominance in interacting boson models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4791–4794 (2001).
  19. J. Barea, José M. A.,  and J. E. García-Ramos, “Relationship between X(5) models and the interacting boson model,” Phys. Rev. C 82, 024316 (2010).
  20. J. E. García-Ramos, J. Dukelsky, P. Pérez-Fernández,  and J. M. Arias, “Phase diagram of an extended Agassi model,” Phys. Rev. C 97, 054303 (2018).
  21. P. Pérez-Fernández, J.-M. Arias, J.-E. García-Ramos,  and L. Lamata, “A digital quantum simulation of the Agassi model,” Phys. Lett. B 829, 137133 (2022).
  22. Á. Sáiz, J.-E. García-Ramos, J. M. Arias, L. Lamata,  and P. Pérez-Fernández, “Digital quantum simulation of an extended Agassi model: Using machine learning to disentangle its phase-diagram,” Phys. Rev. C 106, 064322 (2022).
  23. J. Vidal, J. M. Arias, J. Dukelsky,  and J. E. García-Ramos, “Scalar two-level boson model to study the interacting boson model phase diagram in the Casten triangle,” Phys. Rev. C 73, 054305 (2006).
  24. R. Romano, X. Roca-Maza, G. Colò,  and S. Shen, “Extended Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Hamiltonian,” J. Phys. G 48, 05LT01 (2021).
  25. H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov,  and A. J. Glick, “Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model: (I). Exact solutions and perturbation theory,” Nucl. Phys. 62, 188–198 (1965).
  26. D. Agassi, H. J. Lipkin,  and N. Meshkov, “Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model: (IV). The deformed Hartree-Fock solution,” Nucl. Phys. 86, 321–331 (1966).
  27. J. M. Wahlen-Strothman, T. M. Henderson, M. R. Hermes, M. Degroote, Y. Qiu, J. Zhao, J. Dukelsky,  and G. E. Scuseria, “Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian,” J. Chem. Phys. 146, 054110 (2017).
  28. M. Q. Hlatshwayo, Y. Zhang, H. Wibowo, R. LaRose, D. Lacroix,  and E. Litvinova, “Simulating excited states of the Lipkin model on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. C 106, 024319 (2022).
  29. Y. Beaujeault-Taudière and D. Lacroix, “Solving the Lipkin model using quantum computers with two qubits only with a hybrid quantum-classical technique based on the generator coordinate method,” Phys. Rev. C 109, 024327 (2024).
  30. C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, “Quantum simulations in effective model spaces: Hamiltonian-learning variational quantum eigensolver using digital quantum computers and application to the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model,” Phys. Rev. C 108, 024313 (2023).
  31. J. Faba, V. Martín,  and L. Robledo, “Two-orbital quantum discord in fermion systems,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 032426 (2021a).
  32. J. Faba, V. Martín,  and L. Robledo, “Analysis of quantum correlations within the ground state of a three-level lipkin model,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 062449 (2022).
  33. J. Faba, V. Martín,  and L. Robledo, “Correlation energy and quantum correlations in a solvable model,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 032428 (2021b).
  34. D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, “Predictions of the interacting boson approximation in a consistent q𝑞qitalic_q framework,” Phys. Rev. C 28, 1798–1806 (1983).
  35. R. F. Casten and D. D. Warner, “The interacting boson approximation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 389–469 (1988).
  36. J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, “An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the Bohr-Mottelson model,” Nucl. Phys. A 350, 31–60 (1980a).
  37. J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, “Relationship between the Bohr Collective Hamiltonian and the Interacting-Boson Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1744–1747 (1980b).
  38. A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten,  and F. Iachello, “Classical limit of the interacting-boson model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1747–1750 (1980).
  39. R. F. Casten, “Shape phase transitions and critical-point phenomena in atomic nuclei,” Nat. Phys. 2, 811–820 (2006).
  40. R. F. Casten and E. A. McCutchan, “Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei,” J. Phys. G 34, R285 (2007).
  41. R. F. Casten, “Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 183–209 (2009).
  42. P. Cejnar and J. Jolie, “Quantum phase transitions in the interacting boson model,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 210–256 (2009).
  43. P. Cejnar, J. Jolie,  and R. F. Casten, “Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2155–2212 (2010).
  44. S. Chaturvedi, G. Marmo, N Mukunda, R. Simon,  and A. Zampini, “The Schwinger representation of a group: concept and applications,” Rev. Math. Phys. 18, 887–912 (2006).
  45. R. Gilmore, Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers (John Wiley & Sons, New York,, 1981).
  46. H. R. Grimsley, S. E. Economou, E. Barnes,  and N. J. Mayhall, “An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer,” Nat. Commun. 10, 3007 (2019).
  47. A. M. Romero, J. Engel, H.-L. Tang,  and S. E. Economou, “Solving nuclear structure problems with the adaptive variational quantum algorithm,” Phys. Rev. C 105, 064317 (2022).
  48. A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik,  and J. L. O’Brien, “A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,” Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
  49. J. Tilly, H. Chen, S. Cao, D. Picozzi, K. Setia, Y. Li, E. Grant, L. Wossnig, I. Rungger, G. H. Booth,  and J. Tennyson, “The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices,” Phys. Rep. 986, 1–128 (2022).
  50. A. Pérez-Obiol, A. M. Romero, J. Menéndez, A. Rios, A. García-Sáez,  and B. Juliá-Díaz, “Nuclear shell-model simulation in digital quantum computers,” Sci. Rep. 13, 12291 (2023).
  51. H. R. Grimsley, G. S. Barron, E. Barnes, S. E. Economou,  and N. J. Mayhall, “Adaptive, problem-tailored variational quantum eigensolver mitigates rough parameter landscapes and barren plateaus,” npj Quantum Inf. 9, 19 (2023).
  52. Michael J. C., A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Coppersmith, C. W. Johnson, P. J. Love, C. Poole, K. Robbins,  and M. Saffman, “Lipkin model on a quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. C 104, 024305 (2021).
  53. P. Jordan and E. Wigner, “Über das Paulische Äquivalenzverbot,” Zeitschrift für Physik 47, 631–651 (1928).
  54. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  55. K. Mølmer and A. Sørensen, “Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835–1838 (1999).
  56. C. F. Roos, “Ion trap quantum gates with amplitude-modulated laser beams,” New J. Phys. 10, 013002 (2008).
  57. Lucas C. Céleri, Daniel Huerga, Francisco Albarrán-Arriagada, Enrique Solano, Mikel Garcia de Andoin,  and Mikel Sanz, “Digital-analog quantum simulation of fermionic models,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064086 (2023).
  58. L. Lamata, A. Parra-Rodriguez, M. Sanz,  and E. Solano, “Digital-analog quantum simulations with superconducting circuits,” Advances in Physics: X 3, 1457981 (2018).
  59. H. F Trotter, “On the product of semi-groups of operators,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 545–551 (1959).
  60. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab,  and F. Nori, “Quantum simulation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014).
  61. T. P. Harty, D. T. C. Allcock, C. J. Ballance, L. Guidoni, H. A. Janacek, N. M. Linke, D. N. Stacey,  and D. M. Lucas, “High-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 220501 (2014).
  62. C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol,  and D. M. Lucas, “High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016).
  63. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio,  and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
  64. J. Schmidhuber, “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview,” Neural Networks 61, 85–117 (2015).
  65. C. Nebauer, “Evaluation of convolutional neural networks for visual recognition,” IEEE T. Neural. Networ. 9, 685–696 (1998).
  66. H. H. Aghdam and E. J. Heravi, Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks: A Practical Application to Traffic-Sign Detection and Classification (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2017).
  67. Z. Lin, D. Zhang, Q. Tao, D. Shi, G. Haffari, Q. Wu, M. He,  and Z. Ge, “Medical visual question answering: A survey,” Artif. Intell. Med. 143, 102611 (2023).
  68. S. Ghafari, M. Ghobadi Tarnik,  and H. Sadoghi Yazdi, “Robustness of convolutional neural network models in hyperspectral noisy datasets with loss functions,” Comput. Electr. Eng. 90, 107009 (2021).
  69. J. Bezdek, Pattern Recognition With Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms (Springer New York, NY, 1981).
  70. J. C. Dunn, “A fuzzy relative of the isodata process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters,” J. Cybernetics 3, 32–57 (1973).
  71. S. Lloyd, “Least squares quantization in PCM,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28, 129–137 (1982).
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free