Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Addressing $γ_5$ in Nondimensional Regularizations: A Case Study on the Bumblebee Model

Published 23 Apr 2024 in hep-ph | (2404.15551v2)

Abstract: We examine the subtleties of regularization schemes in four-dimensional space ($4S$), related in particular to the introduction of the $\gamma_5$ matrix. To illustrate we use a "Bumblebee" model featuring dynamically induced Lorentz symmetry violation. The analysis centers on how different regularization methods affect the solutions to the gap equation in this model. We highlight the resolution of ambiguities associated with the $\gamma_5$ matrix in ultraviolet divergent integrals by employing an enhanced Implicit Regularization (IREG) method. This method extends IREG to a quasi-four-dimensional space, $Q4S = 4S \oplus X$, drawing parallels with the consistent approach of Dimensional Reduction (DRED). Comparative analysis is conducted against results from the 't Hooft-Veltman regularization scheme, conventional IREG in strict $4S$, and sharp momentum cutoff techniques. Our results illustrate a scheme to compute $\gamma_5$ interactions in physical dimension of divergent amplitudes, confirming the approach in [1].

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (83)
  1. Dimensional regularization vs methods in fixed dimension with and without γ5subscript𝛾5\gamma_{5}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. JHEP, 08:109, 2018.
  2. Oscar W Greenberg. C p t violation implies violation of lorentz invariance. Physical Review Letters, 89(23):231602, 2002.
  3. V Alan Kosteleckỳ. Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model. Physical Review D, 69(10):105009, 2004.
  4. Constraining lorentz violation with cosmology. Physical review letters, 101(26):261102, 2008.
  5. Probing lorentz-violating electrodynamics with cmb polarization. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023(03):018, 2023.
  6. Cosmological constraints on deviations from lorentz invariance in gravity and dark matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2015(03):016, 2015.
  7. Nonrelativistic quantum hamiltonian for lorentz violation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 40(12):6245–6253, 1999.
  8. Higher order corrections to the hydrogen spectrum from the standard-model extension. Physical Review D, 86(11):116005, 2012.
  9. Ralf Lehnert. Threshold analyses and lorentz violation. Physical Review D, 68(8):085003, 2003.
  10. Cosmological constraints on lorentz violation in electrodynamics. Physical Review Letters, 87(25):251304, 2001.
  11. Signals for lorentz violation in electrodynamics. Physical Review D, 66(5):056005, 2002.
  12. Sensitive polarimetric search for relativity violations in gamma-ray bursts. Physical review letters, 97(14):140401, 2006.
  13. FR Klinkhamer and M Schreck. Consistency of isotropic modified maxwell theory: Microcausality and unitarity. Nuclear Physics B, 848(1):90–107, 2011.
  14. Marco Schreck. Analysis of the consistency of parity-odd nonbirefringent modified maxwell theory. Physical Review D, 86(6):065038, 2012.
  15. One-loop renormalization of the electroweak sector with lorentz violation. Physical Review D, 79(12):125019, 2009.
  16. VE Mouchrek-Santos and Manoel M Ferreira Jr. Erratum: Constraining c p t-odd nonminimal interactions in the electroweak sector [phys. rev. d 95, 071701 (r)(2017)]. Physical Review D, 100(9):099901, 2019.
  17. Einstein-hilbert graviton modes modified by the lorentz-violating bumblebee field. Physical Review D, 90(2):025007, 2014.
  18. B Altschul and V Alan Kosteleckỳ. Spontaneous lorentz violation and nonpolynomial interactions. Physics Letters B, 628(1-2):106–112, 2005.
  19. Matter-gravity couplings and lorentz violation. Physical Review D, 83(1):016013, 2011.
  20. Probing lorentz symmetry violation using the first image of sagittarius a*: Constraints on standard-model extension coefficients. Physical Review D, 106(10):104050, 2022.
  21. Momentum Routing Invariance in Extended QED: Assuring Gauge Invariance Beyond Tree Level. Phys. Rev. D, 93(2):025029, 2016.
  22. On the bose symmetry and the left-and right-chiral anomalies. The European Physical Journal C, 78:1–11, 2018.
  23. γ5subscript𝛾5\gamma_{5}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT algebra ambiguities in Feynman amplitudes: Momentum routing invariance and anomalies in D=4𝐷4D=4italic_D = 4 and D=2𝐷2D=2italic_D = 2. Phys. Rev. D, 94(6):065023, 2016.
  24. Supercurrent anomaly and gauge invariance in the N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D, 98(2):025018, 2018.
  25. Adriano Cherchiglia. Step towards a consistent treatment of chiral theories at higher loop order: The abelian case. Nucl. Phys. B, 987:116104, 2023.
  26. Dynamical lorentz symmetry breaking in a 4d massless four-fermion model. Physical Review D, 96(6):065021, 2017.
  27. Spontaneous breaking of lorentz symmetry in string theory. Physical Review D, 39(2):683, 1989.
  28. Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Physical Review D, 7(6):1888, 1973.
  29. Dynamical lorentz and c p t symmetry breaking in a 4d four-fermion model. Physical Review D, 77(10):105002, 2008.
  30. Martinus Veltman et al. Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields. Nuclear Physics B, 44(1):189–213, 1972.
  31. P Breitenlohner and D Maison. Dimensionally renormalized green’s functions for theories with massless particles. ii. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 52(1):55–75, 1977.
  32. Dimensional regularization and the two-loop axial anomaly in abelian, non-abelian and supersymmetric gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B, 206(3):473–495, 1982.
  33. A practicable γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ 5-scheme in dimensional regularization. Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 54:503–512, 1992.
  34. Dirk Kreimer. The role of γ5subscript𝛾5\gamma_{5}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in dimensional regularization. arXiv preprint hep-ph/9401354, 1994.
  35. SA Larin. The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization. Quarks-92, ed. D. Yu. Grigoriev, VA Matveev, VA Rubakov, PG Tinyakov, World Scientific, page 201, 1993.
  36. Christian Schubert. On the γ5subscript𝛾5\gamma_{5}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: problem of dimensional renormalization. Technical report, P00020090, 1993.
  37. TL Trueman. Spurious anomalies in dimensional renormalization. Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 69:525–536, 1995.
  38. Fred Jegerlehner. Facts of life with γ5subscript𝛾5\gamma_{5}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields, 18(4):673–679, 2001.
  39. Er-Cheng Tsai. The advantage of rightmost ordering for gamma5 in dimensional regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:0905.1479, 2009.
  40. Er-Cheng Tsai. Gauge invariant treatment of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ 5 in the scheme of’t hooft and veltman. Physical Review D, 83(2):025020, 2011.
  41. Ruggero Ferrari. Managing gamma_5 in dimensional regularization and abj anomaly. arXiv preprint arXiv:1403.4212, 2014.
  42. Ruggero Ferrari. Managing γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ 5 in dimensional regularization ii: the trace with more γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ 5’s. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56(3):691–705, 2017.
  43. On γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ5 in higher-order qcd calculations and the nnlo evolution of the polarized valence distribution. Physics Letters B, 748:432–438, 2015.
  44. Ruggero Ferrari. γ⁢_⁢5𝛾_5\gamma\_5italic_γ _ 5 in dimensional regularization: a novel approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06929, 2016.
  45. Long Chen. An observation on Feynman diagrams with axial anomalous subgraphs in dimensional regularization with an anticommuting γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. JHEP, 2023(11):30, 2023.
  46. Dominik Stöckinger. Regularization by dimensional reduction: consistency, quantum action principle, and supersymmetry. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(03):076, 2005.
  47. Approximate four-loop qcd corrections to the higgs-boson production cross section. Physics Letters B, 807:135546, 2020.
  48. Warren Siegel. Supersymmetric dimensional regularization via dimensional reduction. Physics Letters B, 84(2):193–196, 1979.
  49. Warren Siegel. Inconsistency of supersymmetric dimensional regularization. Physics Letters B, 94(1):37–40, 1980.
  50. The computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B, 379(3):451–561, 1992.
  51. Supersymmetric regularization, two-loop qcd amplitudes, and coupling shifts. Physical Review D, 66(8):085002, 2002.
  52. On the four-dimensional formulation of dimensionally regulated amplitudes. The European Physical Journal C, 74(12):3197, 2014.
  53. Roberto Pittau. A four-dimensional approach to quantum field theories. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(11):1–26, 2012.
  54. Towards gauge theories in four dimensions. JHEP, 02:044, 2016.
  55. Four-dimensional unsubtraction with massive particles. JHEP, 10:162, 2016.
  56. Consistency conditions for 4-d regularizations. Modern physics letters A, 13(20):1597–1610, 1998.
  57. Chiral anomaly and cpt invariance in an implicit momentum space regularization framework. Physical Review D, 64(4):046013, 2001.
  58. Consistency relations for an implicit n-dimensional regularization scheme. Physical Review D, 63(4):046004, 2001.
  59. Systematic implementation of implicit regularization for multiloop feynman diagrams. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 26(15):2591–2635, 2011.
  60. To d, or not to d: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes. The European Physical Journal C, 77(7):1–39, 2017.
  61. May the four be with you: Novel ir-subtraction methods to tackle nnlo calculations. The European Physical Journal C, 81:1–61, 2021.
  62. Dirk Kreimer. The γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ5-problem and anomalies—a clifford algebra approach. Physics Letters B, 237(1):59–62, 1990.
  63. Dimensional regularization and breitenlohner-maison/’t hooft-veltman scheme for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ5 applied to chiral ym theories: full one-loop counterterm and rge structure. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(8):1–71, 2020.
  64. Two-loop application of the breitenlohner-maison/’t hooft-veltman scheme with non-anticommuting γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ5: full renormalization and symmetry-restoring counterterms in an abelian chiral gauge theory. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(11):1–32, 2021.
  65. Full three-loop renormalisation of an abelian chiral gauge theory with non-anticommuting γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ55{}_{5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT in the BMHV scheme. JHEP, 02:139, 2024.
  66. Manuel Perez-Victoria. Physical (ir) relevance of ambiguities to lorentz and cpt violation in qed. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2001(04):032, 2001.
  67. Er-Cheng Tsai. Maintaining gauge symmetry in renormalizing chiral gauge theories. Physical Review D, 83(6):065011, 2011.
  68. G Cynolter and E Lendvai. Cutoff regularization method in gauge theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.07407, 2015.
  69. Infrared subtleties and chiral vertices at nlo: an implicit regularization analysis. The European Physical Journal C, 83(9):879, 2023.
  70. (Un)determined finite regularization dependent quantum corrections: the Higgs boson decay into two photons and the two photon scattering examples. Phys. Rev. D, 87(6):065011, 2013.
  71. Higgs boson decay into gluons in a 4d regularization: Ir cancellation without evanescent fields to nlo. The European Physical Journal C, 83(1):73, 2023.
  72. Guises and Disguises of Quadratic Divergences. Annals Phys., 351:751–772, 2014.
  73. A brief review of implicit regularization and its connection with the bphz theorem. Symmetry, 13(6):956, 2021.
  74. Two-loop renormalisation of gauge theories in 4d implicit regularisation and connections to dimensional methods. The European Physical Journal C, 81(5):1–26, 2021.
  75. On the Multiplication of the causal function in the quantum theory of fields. Acta Math., 97:227–266, 1957.
  76. Klaus Hepp. Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization. Commun. Math. Phys., 2:301–326, 1966.
  77. W. Zimmermann. Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space. Commun. Math. Phys., 15:208–234, 1969.
  78. Momentum routing invariance in Feynman diagrams and quantum symmetry breakings. Phys. Rev. D, 86:025016, 2012.
  79. Adriano Cherchiglia. Two-loop gauge coupling β𝛽\betaitalic_β-function in a four-dimensional framework: the Standard Model case. SciPost Phys. Proc., 7:043, 2022.
  80. Subtleties in the beta function calculation of N=1 supersymmetric gauge theories. Eur. Phys. J. C, 76(2):47, 2016.
  81. Regularization Independent Analysis of the Origin of Two Loop Contributions to N=1 Super Yang-Mills Beta Function. Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1633, 2011.
  82. Consistent momentum space regularization / renormalization of supersymmetric quantum field theories: The Three loop beta function for the Wess-Zumino model. JHEP, 12:044, 2003.
  83. Systematization of Basic Divergent Integrals in Perturbation Theory and Renormalization Group Functions. Phys. Lett. B, 673:220–226, 2009.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free