Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A novel mathematical model for predicting the benefits of physical activity on type 2 diabetes progression

Published 23 Apr 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SY, and q-bio.QM | (2404.14915v1)

Abstract: Despite the well-acknowledged benefits of physical activity for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention, the literature surprisingly lacks validated models able to predict the long-term benefits of exercise on T2D progression and support personalized risk prediction and prevention. To bridge this gap, we developed a novel mathematical model that formalizes the link between exercise and short- and long-term glucose-insulin dynamics to predict the benefits of regular exercise on T2D progression. The model quantitatively captured the dose-response relationship (larger benefits with increasing intensity and/or duration of exercise), it consistently reproduced the benefits of clinical guidelines for diabetes prevention, and it accurately predicted persistent benefits following interruption of physical activity, in line with real-world evidence from the literature. These results are encouraging and can be the basis for future development of decision support tools able to assist patients and clinicians in tailoring preventive lifestyle interventions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. Khan, M. A. B. et al. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes – global burden of disease and forecasted trends. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health 10, 107–111 (2019).
  2. Guariguata, L. et al. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes research and clinical practice 103, 137–149 (2014).
  3. Bommer, C. et al. The global economic burden of diabetes in adults aged 20–79 years: a cost-of-illness study. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology 5, 423–430 (2017).
  4. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 414, 782–787 (2001).
  5. Knowler, W. C. Diabetes prevention program research group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with life-style intervention or metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 393–403 (2002).
  6. Prevention of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus by diet and physical exercise the 6-year malmö feasibility study. Diabetologia 34, 891–898 (1991).
  7. Lindström, J. et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the finnish diabetes prevention study. The Lancet 368, 1673–1679 (2006).
  8. Prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: a japanese trial in igt males. Diabetes research and clinical practice 67, 152–162 (2005).
  9. Group, D. P. P. R. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. New England journal of medicine 346, 393–403 (2002).
  10. Hemmingsen, B. et al. Diet, physical activity or both for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017 (2017).
  11. Zahedani, A. D. et al. Digital health application integrating wearable data and behavioral patterns improves metabolic health. NPJ Digital Medicine 6, 216 (2023).
  12. Salunkhe, V. A. et al. Digital lifestyle treatment improves long-term metabolic control in type 2 diabetes with different effects in pathophysiological and genetic subgroups. NPJ Digital Medicine 6, 199 (2023).
  13. A model of β𝛽\betaitalic_β-cell mass, insulin, and glucose kinetics: pathways to diabetes. Journal of theoretical biology 206, 605–619 (2000).
  14. A mathematical model of the pathogenesis, prevention, and reversal of type 2 diabetes. Endocrinology 157, 624–635 (2016).
  15. De Gaetano, A. et al. Mathematical models of diabetes progression. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 295, E1462–E1479 (2008).
  16. A novel fast-slow model of diabetes progression: insights into mechanisms of response to the interventions in the diabetes prevention program. PLoS One 14, e0222833 (2019).
  17. Glucose-insulin mathematical model for the combined effect of medications and life style of type 2 diabetic patients. Biochemical Engineering Journal 176, 108170 (2021).
  18. Palumbo, M. C. et al. Personalizing physical exercise in a computational model of fuel homeostasis. PLoS computational biology 14, e1006073 (2018).
  19. Dynamic modeling of exercise effects on plasma glucose and insulin levels. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 1, 338–347 (2007).
  20. The effect of physical exercise on the dynamics of glucose and insulin. Journal of biomechanics 35, 911–917 (2002).
  21. Tsoukas, M. A. et al. A fully artificial pancreas versus a hybrid artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes: a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled, crossover, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Digital Health 3, e723–e732 (2021).
  22. Kovatchev, B. P. et al. Evening and overnight closed-loop control versus 24/7 continuous closed-loop control for type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial. The Lancet Digital Health 2, e64–e73 (2020).
  23. The anti-inflammatory effect of exercise. Journal of applied physiology 98, 1154–1162 (2005).
  24. Curran, M. et al. The benefits of physical exercise for the health of the pancreatic β𝛽\betaitalic_β-cell: A review of the evidence. Experimental Physiology 105, 579–589 (2020).
  25. Bull, F. C. et al. World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine 54, 1451–1462 (2020).
  26. Boonpor, J. et al. Dose–response relationship between device-measured physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes: findings from the uk biobank prospective cohort study. BMC medicine 21, 191 (2023).
  27. Li, G. et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing diabetes prevention study: a 20-year follow-up study. The Lancet 371, 1783–1789 (2008).
  28. De Paola, P. F. et al. The long-term effects of physical activity on blood glucose regulation: A model to unravel diabetes progression. IEEE Control Systems Letters 7, 2916–2921 (2023).
  29. A system model of the effects of exercise on plasma interleukin-6 dynamics in healthy individuals: role of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. PloS one 12, e0181224 (2017).
  30. A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. Journal of diabetes science and technology 11, 1015–1027 (2017).
  31. Telehealth for diabetes self-management in primary healthcare: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of telemedicine and telecare 24, 356–364 (2018).
  32. Dâmaso, A. R. et al. Aerobic plus resistance training was more effective in improving the visceral adiposity, metabolic profile and inflammatory markers than aerobic training in obese adolescents. Journal of sports sciences 32, 1435–1445 (2014).
  33. Uusitupa, M. et al. Long-term improvement in insulin sensitivity by changing lifestyles of people with impaired glucose tolerance: 4-year results from the finnish diabetes prevention study. Diabetes 52, 2532–2538 (2003).
  34. Balducci, S. et al. Sustained decreases in sedentary time and increases in physical activity are associated with preservation of estimated β𝛽\betaitalic_β-cell function in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 193, 110140 (2022).
  35. Gregg, E. W. et al. Association of an intensive lifestyle intervention with remission of type 2 diabetes. Jama 308, 2489–2496 (2012).
  36. Colberg, S. R. et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the american diabetes association. Diabetes care 39, 2065–2079 (2016).
  37. Haskell, W. L. et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the american college of sports medicine and the american heart association. Circulation 116, 1081–1093 (2007).
  38. Preservation of β𝛽\betaitalic_β-cell function: the key to diabetes prevention. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 96, 2354–2366 (2011).
  39. DeFronzo, R. A. The triumvirate: β𝛽\betaitalic_β-cell, muscle, liver: a collusion responsible for niddm. Diabetes 37, 667–687 (1988).
  40. Update on the effects of physical activity on insulin sensitivity in humans. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine 2, e000143 (2017).
  41. Pan, X.-R. et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing niddm in people with impaired glucose tolerance: the da qing igt and diabetes study. Diabetes care 20, 537–544 (1997).
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper presents an innovative dual-timescale model integrating short-term exercise effects and long-term glycemic control in T2D.
  • It employs IL-6 dynamics to quantify improvements in beta-cell function, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity triggered by physical activity.
  • Simulation results validate the dose-response relationship and sustained glucose improvements, in line with WHO exercise guidelines.

A Novel Mathematical Model for Predicting the Benefits of Physical Activity on Type 2 Diabetes Progression

Introduction

Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a prevalent chronic ailment with increasing incidence rates and substantial economic repercussions on healthcare systems. Although lifestyle changes, specifically physical activity, are known to mitigate the risk of developing T2D, there has been a scarcity of advanced mathematical models that predict the longitudinal benefits of exercise on T2D progression. This paper introduces an innovative mathematical approach designed to capture both short- and long-term effects of physical activity on glucose-insulin dynamics, thus facilitating personalized risk assessment and informed intervention decisions.

Model Overview

This research introduces a dynamic two-timescale model integrating the acute effects and the extended cumulative benefits of physical activity on T2D progression. It employs a dual approach, merging a standard long-term glucose-insulin interaction model with a new mechanism for quantifying physical activity, factoring in its short-term impact mediated through Interleukin-6 (IL-6) dynamics. The IL-6 pathway is especially significant due to its role in maintaining beta-cell function and reducing inflammation, both crucial to glucose homeostasis.

Mathematical Formulation

The model is distinct in combining short-term exercise effects with long-term T2D progression. The model integrates variables such as insulin secretion rate (ISR), metabolic rate (M), and insulin sensitivity (SI), adjusted through a Hill function targeting glucose stabilization. The two primary contributions of this model are the inclusion of multiplicative scaling for IL-6 effects and refined modulation of exercise influence on beta-cell functionality and insulin sensitivity.

Results

The model was validated through simulations of various physical activity regimens, showing capability in replicating real-world dynamics seen in clinical data. Key findings include:

  • Dose-Response Relationship: The model's simulations accurately mirror the anticipated dose-response correlation between exercise intensity and glucose regulation, predicting stronger T2D mitigation effects with escalating exercise intensity.
  • WHO Recommendations: Simulation of physical activity following WHO's moderate and vigorous activity guidelines revealed similar benefits, demonstrating the model's alignment with established preventive guidelines.
  • De-training Effects: Post-intervention analyses mirrored longitudinal studies, showing sustained glucose level improvements even after exercise discontinuation, given prior normative glycemic control had been achieved.

Discussion

The incorporation of IL-6 dynamics and physical activity contributed significantly to advancing the model's predictive accuracy. Beyond its consistency with clinical trial results, this model suggests predictive potential in digital health platforms for tailored interventions. Although the study predicated its findings primarily on exercise effects, future research should also integrate dietary impacts for comprehensive lifestyle modeling. Additionally, differential impacts in low-risk, healthy individuals necessitate further exploration.

Conclusion

This mathematical model stands as a significant progression in predicting the benefits of physical activity on T2D progression. By accurately modeling both immediate and enduring impacts of exercise, the framework lays the groundwork for developing personalized lifestyle interventions that align with clinical practice. Future enhancements will expand its scope to incorporate dietary factors, enhancing its applicability in digital health intervention planning and chronic disease prevention strategies.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.