Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The LISA forecast on a smooth crossover beyond the Standard Model through the scalar-induced gravitational waves

Published 19 Apr 2024 in astro-ph.CO and hep-ph | (2404.12591v3)

Abstract: Supposing the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) gravitational wave (GW) detector, we exhibit the detectability of a hypothetical smooth crossover in the early universe beyond the Standard Model of particle physics through the scalar-induced gravitational wave (SIGW) in terms of the Fisher forecast. A crossover at ∼100 TeV\sim100\,\mathrm{TeV} can leave a signal on the GW spectrum in the ∼mHz\sim\mathrm{mHz} frequency range, the sweet spot of the LISA sensitivity. These possibilities are also interesting in the primordial black hole (PBH) context as the associated PBH mass ∼10<sup>22 g\sim10<sup>{22}\,\mathrm{g} lies at the window to explain the whole dark matter. We found that the properties of the crossover can be well determined if the power spectrum of primordial scalar perturbations are as large as ∼5×10<sup>−4\sim5\times10<sup>{-4} on the corresponding scale ∼10<sup>12 Mpc<sup>−1\sim10<sup>{12}\,\mathrm{Mpc<sup>{-1}}.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. P. Kusch and H. M. Foley, The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 (1948).
  2. J. S. Schwinger, On Quantum electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron, Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948).
  3. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9807003 .
  4. F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helvetica Physica Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  5. M. Laine and K. Rummukainen, A Strong electroweak phase transition up to m(H) is about 105-GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5259 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9804255 .
  6. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc] .
  7. G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE] .
  8. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023a), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE] .
  9. D. J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE] .
  10. H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE] .
  11. J. Antoniadis et al., The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510, 4873 (2022), arXiv:2201.03980 [astro-ph.HE] .
  12. A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE] .
  13. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array: V. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter and the early Universe, arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO] (2023b).
  14. A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett. 30, 682 (1979).
  15. M. S. Turner, Detectability of inflation produced gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 55, R435 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9607066 .
  16. S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, Relic gravitational waves produced after preheating, Phys. Rev. D 56, 653 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9701423 .
  17. J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa, and A. Sastre, A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043517 (2008), arXiv:0707.0839 [hep-ph] .
  18. N. Aggarwal et al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev. Rel. 24, 4 (2021), arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc] .
  19. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Constraints on cosmic strings using data from the first Advanced LIGO observing run, Phys. Rev. D 97, 102002 (2018), arXiv:1712.01168 [gr-qc] .
  20. N. van Remortel, K. Janssens, and K. Turbang, Stochastic gravitational wave background: Methods and implications, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 128, 104003 (2023), arXiv:2210.00761 [gr-qc] .
  21. E. Witten, Cosmic Separation of Phases, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984).
  22. A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner, and R. Watkins, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4514 (1992).
  23. A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4372 (1993), arXiv:astro-ph/9211004 .
  24. C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 163001 (2018), arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO] .
  25. S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba, and N. Sugiyama, Precision calculations of the gravitational wave background spectrum from inflation, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103501 (2009), arXiv:0804.3249 [astro-ph] .
  26. K. Saikawa and S. Shirai, Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model, JCAP 05, 035, arXiv:1803.01038 [hep-ph] .
  27. K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 75, 123518 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612013 .
  28. R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161101 (2009), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)], arXiv:0812.4339 [astro-ph] .
  29. K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123532 (2018), arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc] .
  30. G. Domènech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc] .
  31. F. Hajkarim and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Thermal History of the Early Universe and Primordial Gravitational Waves from Induced Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043522 (2020), arXiv:1910.12357 [hep-ph] .
  32. G. Domènech, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Induced gravitational waves as a probe of thermal history of the universe, JCAP 08, 017, arXiv:2005.12314 [gr-qc] .
  33. K. T. Abe, Y. Tada, and I. Ueda, Induced gravitational waves as a cosmological probe of the sound speed during the QCD phase transition, JCAP 06, 048, arXiv:2010.06193 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. K. T. Abe and Y. Tada, Translating nano-Hertz gravitational wave background into primordial perturbations taking account of the cosmological QCD phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 108, L101304 (2023), arXiv:2307.01653 [astro-ph.CO] .
  35. A. Escrivà, Y. Tada, and C.-M. Yoo, Primordial Black Holes and Induced Gravitational Waves from a Smooth Crossover beyond Standard Model, arXiv:2311.17760 [astro-ph.CO] (2023).
  36. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM] (2017).
  37. N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221103 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108011 .
  38. S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094011 (2011).
  39. Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model, Sov. Astron. 10, 602 (1967).
  40. S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971).
  41. B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 399 (1974).
  42. B. J. Carr, The Primordial black hole mass spectrum, Astrophys. J. 201, 1 (1975).
  43. A. Escrivà, F. Kuhnel, and Y. Tada, Primordial Black Holes, arXiv:2211.05767 [astro-ph.CO] (2022).
  44. C.-M. Yoo, The Basics of Primordial Black Hole Formation and Abundance Estimation, Galaxies 10, 112 (2022), arXiv:2211.13512 [astro-ph.CO] .
  45. A. Escrivà and J. G. Subils, Primordial black hole formation during a strongly coupled crossover, Phys. Rev. D 107, L041301 (2023), arXiv:2211.15674 [astro-ph.CO] .
  46. K. Schmitz, New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01, 097, arXiv:2002.04615 [hep-ph] .
  47. V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005).
  48. IGWsfSC code, https://github.com/albert-escriva/IGWsfSC.git (2024), [Online].
  49. M. Tegmark, A. Taylor, and A. Heavens, Karhunen-Loeve eigenvalue problems in cosmology: How should we tackle large data sets?, Astrophys. J. 480, 22 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9603021 .
  50. D. Coe, Fisher Matrices and Confidence Ellipses: A Quick-Start Guide and Software, arXiv:0906.4123 [astro-ph.IM] (2009).
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free