Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A central limit theorem for partially distinguishable bosons

Published 17 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.11518v1)

Abstract: The quantum central limit theorem derived by Cushen and Hudson provides the foundations for understanding how subsystems of large bosonic systems evolving unitarily do reach equilibrium. It finds important applications in the context of quantum interferometry, for example, with photons. A practical feature of current photonic experiments, however, is that photons carry their own internal degrees of freedom pertaining to, e.g., the polarization or spatiotemporal mode they occupy, which makes them partially distinguishable. The ensuing deviation from ideal indistinguishability is well known to have observable consequences, for example in relation with boson bunching, but an understanding of its role in bosonic equilibration phenomena is still missing. Here, we generalize the Cushen-Hudson quantum central limit theorem to encompass scenarios with partial distinguishability, implying an asymptotic convergence of the subsystem's reduced state towards a multimode Gaussian state defined over the internal degrees of freedom. While these asymptotic internal states may not be directly accessible, we show that particle number distributions carry important signatures of distinguishability, which may be used to diagnose experimental imperfections in large boson sampling experiments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 056001 (2016).
  2. C. D. Cushen and R. L. Hudson, Journal of Applied Probability 8, 454–469 (1971).
  3. K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, Annals of Physics 76, 360 (1973).
  4. L. E. Hepp K., Helv. Phys. Acta 46(5) (1974).
  5. N. Giri and von Waldenfels W., Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw Gebiete  (1978).
  6. V. P. Goderis D., Commun. Math. Phys. 122 (1989).
  7. J. Dereziński, Reports on Mathematical Physics 21, 405 (1985).
  8. M. M. Wolf, G. Giedke, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 080502 (2006).
  9. M. Cramer and J. Eisert, New Journal of Physics 12, 055020 (2010).
  10. M. Gluza, J. Eisert, and T. Farrelly, SciPost Physics 7, 038 (2019).
  11. J. Shi and T. Byrnes, npj Quantum Information 8, 54 (2022).
  12. V. Shchesnovich and M. Bezerra, Physical Review A 98, 033805 (2018).
  13. B. Seron, L. Novo, and N. J. Cerf, Nature Photonics 17, 702–709 (2023).
  14. M. C. Tichy, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022316 (2015a).
  15. K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 177, 1857 (1969).
  16. M. C. Tichy, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 47, 103001 (2014).
  17. R. Jozsa and J. Schlienz, Physical Review A 62, 10.1103/physreva.62.012301 (2000).
  18. P. Král, Journal of Modern Optics 37, 889 (1990).
  19. M. C. Tichy, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022316 (2015b).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 7 likes about this paper.