Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Extending the Tavis-Cummings model for molecular ensembles -- Exploring the effects of dipole self energies and static dipole moments

Published 16 Apr 2024 in physics.chem-ph and quant-ph | (2404.10680v2)

Abstract: Strong coupling of organic molecules to the vacuum field of a nanoscale cavity can be used to modify their chemical and physical properties. We extend the Tavis-Cummings model for molecular ensembles and show that the often neglected interaction terms arising from the static dipole moment and the dipole self-energy are essential for a correct description of the light-matter interaction in polaritonic chemistry. On the basis of a full quantum description, we simulate the excited-state dynamics and spectroscopy of MgH$+$ molecules resonantly coupled to an optical cavity. We show that the inclusion of static dipole moments and the dipole self-energy is necessary to obtain a consistent model. We construct an efficient two-level system approach that reproduces the main features of the real molecular system and may be used to simulate larger molecular ensembles.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. T. W. Ebbesen, Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2403 (2016).
  2. F. Herrera and J. Owrutsky, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 100902 (2020).
  3. I. I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 51, 652 (1937).
  4. R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  5. E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
  6. M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, Phys. Lett. A 25, 714 (1967).
  7. F. J. Hernández and F. Herrera, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 144116 (2019).
  8. T. Schnappinger and M. Kowalewski, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 9278 (2023).
  9. J. McTague and J. J. Foley, 4th, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 154103 (2022).
  10. I. V. Tokatly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233001 (2013).
  11. J. Klauder and B. Skagerstam, “Coherent states,”  (1985).
  12. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley, 2001).
  13. “Atom-field interaction,” in Quantum Optics in Phase Space (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2001) Chap. 14, pp. 381–412.
  14. P. J. Knowles and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 145, 514 (1988).
  15. P. J. Knowles and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 115, 259 (1985).
  16. H. Werner and P. J. Knowles, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 5053 (1985).
  17. H. Werner and P. J. Knowles, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 5803 (1988).
  18. E. Davidsson and M. Kowalewski, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 234304 (2020a).
  19. E. Davidsson and M. Kowalewski, J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 4672 (2020b).
  20. M. Gudem and M. Kowalewski, J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 1142 (2021).
  21. R. C. Couto and M. Kowalewski, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.  (2022), 10.1039/D2CP00774F.
  22. R. Kosloff and H. Tal-Ezer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 127, 223 (1986).
  23. M. Kowalewski and R. de Vivie-Riedle, “QDng: A grid based molecular quantum dynamics package,”  (2024), https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10944496.
  24. M. Kowalewski and P. Seeber, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 122, e26872 (2022).
Citations (4)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.