Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Pre-Trained Features for Camera Pose Refinement

Published 16 Apr 2024 in cs.CV | (2404.10438v1)

Abstract: Pose refinement is an interesting and practically relevant research direction. Pose refinement can be used to (1) obtain a more accurate pose estimate from an initial prior (e.g., from retrieval), (2) as pre-processing, i.e., to provide a better starting point to a more expensive pose estimator, (3) as post-processing of a more accurate localizer. Existing approaches focus on learning features / scene representations for the pose refinement task. This involves training an implicit scene representation or learning features while optimizing a camera pose-based loss. A natural question is whether training specific features / representations is truly necessary or whether similar results can be already achieved with more generic features. In this work, we present a simple approach that combines pre-trained features with a particle filter and a renderable representation of the scene. Despite its simplicity, it achieves state-of-the-art results, demonstrating that one can easily build a pose refiner without the need for specific training. The code is at https://github.com/ga1i13o/mcloc_poseref

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (121)
  1. Photometric bundle adjustment for vision-based slam. In Computer Vision–ACCV 2016: 13th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part IV 13, pages 324–341. Springer, 2017.
  2. Image quality assessment by comparing cnn features between images. In Image Quality and System Performance, 2016.
  3. NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. In CVPR, 2016.
  4. Map-free visual relocalization: Metric pose relative to a single image. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 690–708. Springer, 2022.
  5. Simultaneous localization and mapping (slam): Part ii. IEEE robotics & automation magazine, 13(3):108–117, 2006.
  6. Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. IJCV, 56, 2003.
  7. Mip-nerf: A multiscale representation for anti-aliasing neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5855–5864, 2021.
  8. Rethinking visual geo-localization for large-scale applications. In CVPR, 2022a.
  9. Deep visual geo-localization benchmark. In CVPR, 2022b.
  10. Learning meshes for dense visual slam. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 5854–5863, 2019.
  11. Learning Less is More-6D Camera Localization via 3D Surface Regression. In CVPR, 2018.
  12. Visual camera re-localization from RGB and RGB-D images using DSAC. TPAMI, 2021.
  13. DSAC-Differentiable RANSAC for Camera Localization. In CVPR, 2017.
  14. On the limits of pseudo ground truth in visual camera re-localisation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6218–6228, 2021.
  15. Landscapear: Large scale outdoor augmented reality by matching photographs with terrain models using learned descriptors. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXIX, page 295–312, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2020. Springer-Verlag.
  16. Camera pose filtering with local regression geodesics on the riemannian manifold of dual quaternions. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops, pages 2436–2445, 2017.
  17. Let’s take this online: Adapting scene coordinate regression network predictions for online RGB-D camera relocalisation. In 3DV, 2019.
  18. Real-time rgb-d camera pose estimation in novel scenes using a relocalisation cascade. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(10):2465–2477, 2020.
  19. Dfnet: Enhance absolute pose regression with direct feature matching. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1–17. Springer, 2022.
  20. Refinement for absolute pose regression with neural feature synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10087, 2023.
  21. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1597–1607. PMLR, 2020.
  22. Monte carlo filtering on lie groups. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187), pages 304–309 vol.1, 2000.
  23. Robust 3d visual tracking using particle filtering on the special euclidean group: A combined approach of keypoint and edge features. Intl. Jour. of Robotics Research, 33, 2012.
  24. Locally optimized RANSAC. In Joint Pattern Recognition Symposium, pages 236–243. Springer, 2003.
  25. Matching features without descriptors: implicitly matched interest points. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10681, 2018.
  26. Fab-map: Appearance-based place recognition and mapping using a learned visual vocabulary model. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), pages 3–10, 2010.
  27. SuperPoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description. In CVPR Workshop on Deep Learning for Visual SLAM, 2018.
  28. CamNet: Coarse-to-fine retrieval for camera re-localization. In ICCV, 2019.
  29. Unsupervised visual representation learning by context prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1422–1430, 2015.
  30. Comparison of resampling schemes for particle filtering. In ISPA 2005. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 2005., pages 64–69. IEEE, 2005.
  31. Simultaneous localization and mapping: part i. IEEE robotics & automation magazine, 13(2):99–110, 2006.
  32. D2-Net: A trainable CNN for joint detection and description of local features. In CVPR, 2019.
  33. Roma: Revisiting robust losses for dense feature matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15404, 2023.
  34. Direct sparse odometry. TPAMI, 40(3):611–625, 2017.
  35. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981.
  36. Monte carlo localization: Efficient position estimation for mobile robots. Aaai/iaai, 1999(343-349):2–2, 1999a.
  37. Markov localization for mobile robots in dynamic environments. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 11:391–427, 1999b.
  38. Particle Filters for Mobile Robot Localization, pages 401–428. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2001.
  39. Deepsim: Deep similarity for image quality assessment. Neurocomputing, 257, 2017.
  40. Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
  41. Feature query networks: Neural surface description for camera pose refinement. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pages 5067–5077, 2022.
  42. Human poseitioning system (hps): 3d human pose estimation and self-localization in large scenes from body-mounted sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4318–4329, 2021.
  43. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge university press, 2003.
  44. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770–778, 2016.
  45. Image-based geo-localization using satellite imagery. International Journal of Computer Vision, 128(5):1205–1219, 2020.
  46. Heterogeneous ground and air platforms, homogeneous sensing: Team csiro data61’s approach to the darpa subterranean challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09053, 2021.
  47. Robust image retrieval-based visual localization using kapture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13867, 2020.
  48. Investigating the role of image retrieval for visual localization: An exhaustive benchmark. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(7):1811–1836, 2022.
  49. Wardah Inam. Particle filter based self-localization using visual landmarks and image database. In 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation - (CIRA), pages 246–251, 2009.
  50. Particle filter networks with application to visual localization. In Conference on robot learning, pages 169–178. PMLR, 2018.
  51. Screened poisson surface reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph., 32:29:1–29:13, 2013.
  52. Geometric loss functions for camera pose regression with deep learning. In CVPR, 2017.
  53. PoseNet: A convolutional network for real-time 6-DoF camera relocalization. In ICCV, 2015.
  54. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42(4), 2023.
  55. Deep learning of human visual sensitivity in image quality assessment framework. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017.
  56. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012.
  57. Visual tracking via particle filtering on the affine group. In 2008 International Conference on Information and Automation, pages 997–1002, 2008.
  58. Particle filtering on the euclidean group: Framework and applications. Robotica, 25:725–737, 2007.
  59. Megapose: 6d pose estimation of novel objects via render & compare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06870, 2022.
  60. Revisiting Radial Distortion Absolute Pose. In ICCV, 2019.
  61. Monocular Model-Based 3D Tracking of Rigid Objects: A Survey. 2005.
  62. Kenneth Levenberg. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly of applied mathematics, 2(2):164–168, 1944.
  63. Hierarchical scene coordinate classification and regression for visual localization. In CVPR, 2020.
  64. Worldwide pose estimation using 3D point clouds. In ECCV, 2012.
  65. Deepim: Deep iterative matching for 6d pose estimation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 683–698, 2018.
  66. MegaDepth: Learning single-view depth prediction from internet photos. In CVPR, 2018.
  67. Parallel inversion of neural radiance fields for robust pose estimation. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 9377–9384. IEEE, 2023.
  68. Nerf-loc: Visual localization with conditional neural radiance field. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07979, 2023.
  69. Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983, 2016.
  70. Loc-nerf: Monte carlo localization using neural radiance fields. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 4018–4025. IEEE, 2023.
  71. Donald W Marquardt. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2):431–441, 1963.
  72. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In European conference on computer vision, 2020.
  73. Lens: Localization enhanced by nerf synthesis. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 1347–1356. PMLR, 2022.
  74. Crossfire: Camera relocalization on self-supervised features from an implicit representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 252–262, 2023.
  75. Image-to-image translation for enhanced feature matching, image retrieval and visual localization. ISPRS annals, IV-2/W7:111–119, 2019.
  76. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Trans. Graph., 41(4):102:1–102:15, 2022.
  77. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 41(4):1–15, 2022.
  78. Robust visual localization across seasons. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(2):289–302, 2018.
  79. Dtam: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2320–2327, 2011.
  80. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision, 2023.
  81. MeshLoc: Mesh-Based Visual Localization. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022.
  82. Visual localization using imperfect 3d models from the internet. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13175–13186, 2023.
  83. Lambda twist: An accurate fast robust perspective three point (p3p) solver. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 318–332, 2018.
  84. Segloc: Learning segmentation-based representations for privacy-preserving visual localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 15380–15391, 2023.
  85. Benchmarking image retrieval for visual localization. In 3DV, 2020.
  86. [poster] a particle filter approach to outdoor localization using image-based rendering. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pages 132–135, 2015.
  87. Interaction replica: Tracking human-object interaction and scene changes from human motion. 2023.
  88. Kilonerf: Speeding up neural radiance fields with thousands of tiny mlps. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021.
  89. R2D2: Repeatable and reliable detector and descriptor. In NeurIPS, 2019.
  90. Leveraging deep visual descriptors for hierarchical efficient localization. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 456–465. PMLR, 2018.
  91. From coarse to fine: Robust hierarchical localization at large scale. In CVPR, 2019.
  92. SuperGlue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks. In CVPR, 2020.
  93. Back to the Feature: Learning Robust Camera Localization from Pixels to Pose. In CVPR, 2021.
  94. Image retrieval for image-based localization revisited. In BMVC, 2012.
  95. Hyperpoints and fine vocabularies for large-scale location recognition. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), page 2102–2110, USA, 2015. IEEE Computer Society.
  96. Efficient & effective prioritized matching for large-scale image-based localization. TPAMI, 39(9):1744–1756, 2016.
  97. Benchmarking 6DOF outdoor visual localization in changing conditions. In CVPR, 2018.
  98. Structure-from-motion revisited. In CVPR, 2016.
  99. Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. In ECCV, 2016.
  100. Semantic visual localization. In CVPR, 2018.
  101. Bad slam: Bundle adjusted direct rgb-d slam. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 134–144, 2019.
  102. Accurate geo-registration by ground-to-aerial image matching. In Proceedings of the 2014 2nd International Conference on 3D Vision - Volume 01, page 525–532, USA, 2014. IEEE Computer Society.
  103. Learning multi-scene absolute pose regression with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11468, 2021.
  104. Scene coordinate regression forests for camera relocalization in RGB-D images. In CVPR, 2013.
  105. imap: Implicit mapping and positioning in real-time. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6229–6238, 2021.
  106. Loftr: Detector-free local feature matching with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8922–8931, 2021.
  107. InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View Synthesis. TPAMI, 2019a.
  108. Is this the right place? geometric-semantic pose verification for indoor visual localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4373–4383, 2019b.
  109. Nerfstudio: A modular framework for neural radiance field development. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings, 2023.
  110. Probabilistic robotics. MIT Press, 2005.
  111. 24/7 place recognition by view synthesis. In CVPR, 2015.
  112. Divide&classify: Fine-grained classification for city-wide visual geo-localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 11142–11152, 2023.
  113. P1ac: Revisiting absolute pose from a single affine correspondence. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19751–19761, 2023.
  114. GN-Net: The Gauss-Newton loss for multi-weather relocalization. RA-L, 5(2):890–897, 2020a.
  115. LM-Reloc: Levenberg-Marquardt based direct visual relocalization. In 3DV, 2020b.
  116. inerf: Inverting neural radiance fields for pose estimation. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1323–1330. IEEE, 2021.
  117. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 586–595, 2018.
  118. Reference pose generation for long-term visual localization via learned features and view synthesis. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129:821–844, 2021.
  119. Aliked: A lighter keypoint and descriptor extraction network via deformable transformation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023.
  120. Patch2pix: Epipolar-guided pixel-level correspondences. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4669–4678, 2021.
  121. Nice-slam: Neural implicit scalable encoding for slam. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12786–12796, 2022.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that integrating pre-trained deep features with particle filtering achieves state-of-the-art camera pose refinement without scene-specific training.
  • It employs a render-and-compare framework that iteratively refines candidate poses based on similarity scores from generic deep features.
  • Experimental results show robust performance across diverse datasets and scalability to large scenes, enabling efficient visual localization.

Simplifying Pose Refinement with Pre-trained Features and Particle Filters

Introduction to Pose Refinement

Pose refinement plays a pivotal role in visual localization tasks critical for a variety of applications including autonomous navigation, augmented reality, and robotics. Traditional approaches often necessitate complex training procedures focusing on learning specific scene representations or features optimized for camera pose estimation. This paper introduces a novel, more straightforward approach leveraging pre-trained features combined with a particle filter and a renderable scene representation to refine pose estimates. Remarkably, this method achieves state-of-the-art results without requiring specialized training for pose refinement.

Leveraging Pre-trained Features for Pose Refinement

The core hypothesis of this work is questioning the necessity of training scene-specific features for effective pose refinement. Instead, the authors propose utilizing generic, pre-trained deep features in conjunction with a particle filter-based optimization to refine pose estimates within a render-and-compare framework.

Key points include:

  • The method uses pre-trained features from general-purpose deep neural networks, eliminating the need for per-scene feature training.
  • A particle filter serves as the optimization strategy, efficiently exploring the hypothesis space for pose refinement.
  • The approach is flexible, accommodating various scene representations including textured meshes and Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs).

Methodology

The paper presents a detailed methodology outlining the integration of pre-trained features and particle filtering for pose refinement. The process involves:

  1. Starting with an initial pose estimate, the algorithm perturbs this pose to sample new candidate poses.
  2. For each candidate pose, a corresponding view of the scene is rendered.
  3. The rendered views are then compared to the actual query image using pre-trained features to evaluate pose similarity.
  4. A particle filter algorithm iteratively refines the pose estimate based on the similarity scores, converging to a more accurate pose estimate.

A critical insight is the effective use of dense, pre-trained deep features at varying levels of abstraction to assess visual similarity across different stages of refinement. The method exploits coarse features for wide-baseline alignment in initial stages and switches to finer features for detailed refinement as the algorithm converges.

Experimental Results and Analysis

The experimental evaluation demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed approach across various datasets. Remarkably, without per-scene training or fine-tuning, the method competes with or outperforms modern pose estimators and specialized refinement pipelines. Key findings are:

  • Generic features provide a robust cost function for pose refinement, exhibiting a well-shaped convex basin around the correct pose across different datasets and initial pose accuracies.
  • The approach scales efficiently to large scenes, unlike many existing methods that require per-scene optimization.
  • The method is versatile, acting as a standalone pose refinement tool or enhancing the performance of matching-based localization approaches as a pre- or post-processing step.

Implications and Future Directions

The presented work challenges the prevailing assumption that pose refinement inherently requires scene-specific feature learning. By leveraging pre-trained features within a render-and-compare framework, the authors provide a simpler, yet powerful alternative that broadens the applicability and efficiency of pose refinement methods.

The implications for future AI and robotic navigation research are significant. This approach could simplify the deployment of visual localization systems in novel environments, accelerate the development cycle, and reduce computational requirements. Further exploration could involve examining the integration of this method with other scene representations and optimization strategies to enhance versatility and performance further.

In conclusion, this paper contributes a significant shift in perspective towards pose refinement, emphasizing simplicity, efficiency, and generality. The provided open-source codebase invites other researchers to explore, extend, and apply this approach to a wide range of localization and mapping challenges.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 101 likes about this paper.