Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exclusive-or encoded algebraic structure for efficient quantum dynamics

Published 14 Apr 2024 in cond-mat.other and quant-ph | (2404.09312v2)

Abstract: We propose a formalism that captures the algebraic structure of many-body two-level quantum systems, and directly motivates an efficient numerical method. This formalism is based on the binary representation of the enumeration-indices of the elements of the corresponding Lie algebra. The action of arbitrarily large elements of that algebra reduces to a few bit-wise exclusive-or operations. This formalism naturally produces sparse representations of many-body density operators, the size of which we control through a dynamic truncation method. We demonstrate how this formalism applies to real-time evolution, dissipative Lindblad action, imaginary-time evolution, and projective measurement processes. We find that this approach to calculating quantum dynamics scales close to linearly with the number of non-zero components in the density operator. We refer to this exclusive-or represented quantum algebra as ORQA. As a proof of concept, we provide a numerical demonstration of this formalism by simulating quantum annealing processes for the maximum independent set problem for up to 22 two-level systems.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
  2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  3. M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports 93, 301 (1982).
  4. V. V. Temnov and U. Woggon, Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-q𝑞qitalic_q cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
  5. B. M. Garraway, The dicke model in quantum optics: Dicke model revisited, Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369, 1137 (2011).
  6. I. Affleck, Quantum spin chains and the haldane gap, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1, 3047 (1989).
  7. N. Khaneja and S. J. Glaser, Cartan decomposition of su(2n) and control of spin systems, Chemical Physics 267, 11 (2001).
  8. S. Backens, A. Shnirman, and Y. Makhlin, Jordan–wigner transformations for tree structures, Scientific Reports 9, 2598 (2019).
  9. P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Über das paulische äquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift für Physik 47, 631 (1928).
  10. J. Schwinger, On Angular Momentum, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2015).
  11. T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
  12. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
  13. J. D. Biamonte and P. J. Love, Realizable hamiltonians for universal adiabatic quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012352 (2008).
  14. E. Ising, Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus, Zeitschrift für Physik 31, 253 (1925).
  15. A. Lucas, Ising formulations of many np problems, Frontiers in Physics 2, 10.3389/fphy.2014.00005 (2014).
  16. F. Glover, G. Kochenberger, and Y. Du, Quantum bridge analytics i: a tutorial on formulating and using qubo models, 4OR 17, 335 (2019).
  17. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph] .
  18. R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467 (1982).
  19. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  20. S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).
  21. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
  22. R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics 349, 117 (2014).
  23. R. Orús, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 538 (2019).
  24. D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Quantum monte carlo, Science 231, 555 (1986).
  25. B. M. Austin, D. Y. Zubarev, and W. A. J. Lester, Quantum monte carlo and related approaches, Chemical Reviews 112, 263 (2012).
  26. M. Zwolak and G. Vidal, Mixed-state dynamics in one-dimensional quantum lattice systems: A time-dependent superoperator renormalization algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207205 (2004).
  27. F. Verstraete, J. J. García-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004).
  28. D. Manzano, A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation, AIP Advances 10, 025106 (2020).
  29. Here we focus on measurements of the first kind, comp. [40].
  30. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise, 2nd ed., edited by H. Haken (Springer, 2000).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.