Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Classical simulation and quantum resource theory of non-Gaussian optics

Published 10 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.07115v3)

Abstract: We propose efficient algorithms for classically simulating Gaussian unitaries and measurements applied to non-Gaussian initial states. The constructions are based on decomposing the non-Gaussian states into linear combinations of Gaussian states. We use an extension of the covariance matrix formalism to efficiently track relative phases in the superpositions of Gaussian states. We get an exact simulation algorithm which cost scales quadratically with the number of Gaussian states required to represent the initial state and an approximate simulation algorithm which cost scales linearly with the $l_1$ norm of the coefficients associated with the superposition. We define measures of non-Gaussianty quantifying this simulation cost, which we call the Gaussian rank and the Gaussian extent. From the perspective of quantum resource theories, we investigate the properties of this type of non-Gaussianity measure and compute optimal decomposition for states relevant to continuous-variable quantum computing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. O. Pfister, Continuous-variable quantum computing in the quantum optical frequency comb, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53, 012001 (2020).
  2. A. L. Grimsmo and A. Blais, Squeezing and quantum state engineering with Josephson travelling wave amplifiers, npj Quantum Information 3, 20 (2017).
  3. Generation of cluster states in optomechanical quantum systems, Physical Review A 92, 063843 (2015).
  4. A. A. Rakhubovsky and R. Filip, Stroboscopic high-order nonlinearity for quantum optomechanics, npj Quantum Information 7, 1 (2021).
  5. D. F. Milne and N. V. Korolkova, Composite-cluster states and alternative architectures for one-way quantum computation, Physical Review A 85, 032310 (2012).
  6. Y. Ikeda and N. Yamamoto, Deterministic generation of Gaussian pure states in a quasilocal dissipative system, Physical Review A 87, 033802 (2013).
  7. A. Mari and J. Eisert, Positive wigner functions render classical simulation of quantum computation efficient, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230503 (2012).
  8. A. L. Grimsmo and S. Puri, Quantum error correction with the gottesman-kitaev-preskill code, PRX Quantum 2, 020101 (2021).
  9. A. Kenfack and K. Życzkowski, Negativity of the wigner function as an indicator of non-classicality, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6, 396 (2004).
  10. R. Takagi and Q. Zhuang, Convex resource theory of non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062337 (2018).
  11. U. Chabaud and M. Walschaers, Resources for bosonic quantum computational advantage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 090602 (2023).
  12. B. Dias and R. Koenig, Classical simulation of non-gaussian fermionic circuits,  (2023), arXiv:2307.12912 [quant-ph] .
  13. A. Serafini, Quantum continuous variables: a primer of theoretical methods (CRC press, 2017).
  14. F. M. Dopico and C. R. Johnson, Parametrization of the matrix symplectic group and applications, SIAM journal on matrix analysis and applications 31, 650 (2009).
  15. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  16. K. Kuroiwa and H. Yamasaki, General Quantum Resource Theories: Distillation, Formation and Consistent Resource Measures, Quantum 4, 355 (2020).
  17. S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by clifford gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250501 (2016).
  18. S. Bravyi and D. Gosset, Complexity of Quantum Impurity Problems, Communications in Mathematical Physics 356, 451 (2017).
  19. S. Ghose and B. C. Sanders, Non-gaussian ancilla states for continuous variable quantum computation via gaussian maps, Journal of Modern Optics 54, 855 (2007).
  20. B. Dias and R. Koenig, Classical simulation of non-gaussian bosonic circuits,  (2024), arXiv:2403.19059 [quant-ph] .
  21. U. Chabaud and S. Mehraban, Holomorphic representation of quantum computations, Quantum 6, 831 (2022).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.