Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Classical and quantum field theory in a box with moving boundaries: A numerical study of the Dynamical Casimir Effect

Published 9 Apr 2024 in quant-ph, gr-qc, and hep-th | (2404.06166v2)

Abstract: We present a detailed description of a quantum scalar field theory within a flat spacetime confined to a cavity with perfectly reflecting moving boundaries. Moreover, we establish an equivalence between this time-dependent setting and a field theory on an acoustic metric with static Dirichlet boundary conditions. We discuss the classical and quantum aspects of the theory from the latter perspective, accompanied by the introduction of novel numerical techniques designed for the (nonperturbative) computation of particle production attributed to the Dynamical Casimir effect, applicable to arbitrary boundary trajectories. As an illustrative example of these methodologies, we compute the particle production for a massless field in 1+1 dimensions. Notably, our approaches readily extend to encompass scenarios involving massive fields and higher dimensions

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1984).
  2. N. Obadia and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 64, 044019 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103061 .
  3. J. Haro and E. Elizalde, J. Phys. A 41, 032002 (2008), arXiv:0709.3638 [quant-ph] .
  4. I. A. Reyes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 051602 (2021), arXiv:2103.01230 [hep-th] .
  5. K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/4505 .
  6. G. T. Moore, Journal of Mathematical Physics 11, 2679 (1970), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665432 .
  7. M. Castagnino and R. Ferraro, Annals Phys. 154, 1 (1984).
  8. D. A. R. Dalvit and F. D. Mazzitelli, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3049 (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9810092 .
  9. M. P. E. Lock and I. Fuentes, New J. Phys. 19, 073005 (2017), arXiv:1607.05444 [quant-ph] .
  10. C. Sabín and G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042107 (2015), arXiv:1506.09001 [quant-ph] .
  11. V. V. Dodonov, MDPI Physics 2, 67 (2020).
  12. J. Doukas and J. Louko, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044010 (2015), arXiv:1411.2948 [quant-ph] .
  13. R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1994).
  14. A. Serafini, Quantum continuous variables: a primer of theoretical methods (CRC press, 2017).
  15. F. Strocchi, Symmetry Breaking, Vol. 643 (Springer, 2021).
  16. L. Li and B.-Z. Li, Physics Letters A 300, 27 (2002).
  17. L. Ling and L. Bo-Zang, Chinese Physics Letters 19, 1061 (2002).
  18. M. Ruser, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 7, S100 (2005).
  19. M. Ruser, J. Phys. A 39, 6711 (2006a), arXiv:quant-ph/0603097 .
  20. M. Ruser, Phys. Rev. A 73, 043811 (2006b), arXiv:quant-ph/0509030 .
  21. P. I. Villar and A. Soba, Phys. Rev. E 96, 013307 (2017).
  22. V. Dodonov, Physics Letters A 213, 219 (1996).
  23. P. C. W. Davies and S. A. Fulling, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 348, 393 (1976).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 5 likes about this paper.