Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Information Sale on Network

Published 8 Apr 2024 in econ.TH | (2404.05546v1)

Abstract: This paper studies a stylized model of a monopoly data seller when information-sharing network exists among data buyers. We show that, if the buyers' prior information is sufficiently noisy, the optimal selling strategy is characterized by a maximum independent set, which is the largest set of buyers who do not have information-sharing link at all. In addition, the precision of the seller's data decreases in the number of information-sharing links among buyers, but it is higher than the socially efficient level of precision.

Authors (3)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Ballester, Coralio, Antoni Calvó-Armengol, and Yves Zenou. 2006. “Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player.” Econometrica, 74(5): 1403–1417.
  2. Bloch, Francis. 2016. “Targeting and pricing in social networks.” The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks.
  3. Bloch, Francis, and Nicolas Quérou. 2013. “Pricing in social networks.” Games and Economic Behavior, 80: 243–261.
  4. Bloch, Francis, Gabrielle Demange, and Rachel Kranton. 2018. “Rumors and social networks.” International Economic Review, 59(2): 421–448.
  5. Bramoullé, Yann, and Rachel Kranton. 2007. “Public goods in networks.” Journal of Economic Theory, 135(1): 478–494.
  6. Bramoullé, Yann, Rachel Kranton, and Martin D’amours. 2014. “Strategic interaction and networks.” American Economic Review, 104(3): 898–930.
  7. Campbell, Arthur. 2013. “Word-of-mouth communication and percolation in social networks.” American Economic Review, 103(6): 2466–98.
  8. Candogan, Ozan. 2022. “Persuasion in networks:: public signals and cores.” Operations Research, 70(4): 2264–2298.
  9. Candogan, Ozan, Kostas Bimpikis, and Asuman Ozdaglar. 2012. “Optimal pricing in networks with externalities.” Operations Research, 60(4): 883–905.
  10. Cheng, Chen, and Yiqing Xing. 2022. “Which networks permit stable allocations? A theory of network-based comparisons.” Theoretical Economics, 17(4): 1473–1499.
  11. Egorov, Georgy, and Konstantin Sonin. 2020. “Persuasion on networks.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. Galeotti, Andrea, and Sanjeev Goyal. 2010. “The law of the few.” American Economic Review, 100(4): 1468–92.
  13. Gal-Or, Esther. 1985. “Information sharing in oligopoly.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 329–343.
  14. Goyal, Sanjeev, Stephanie Rosenkranz, Utz Weitzel, and Vincent Buskens. 2017. “Information acquisition and exchange in social networks.” The Economic Journal, 127(606): 2302–2331.
  15. Grossman, Sanford J, and Joseph E Stiglitz. 1980. “On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets.” American Economic Review, 70(3): 393–408.
  16. Halim, Edward, Yohanes E Riyanto, and Nilanjan Roy. 2019. “Costly information acquisition, social networks, and asset prices: Experimental evidence.” The Journal of Finance, 74(4): 1975–2010.
  17. Han, Bing, and Liyan Yang. 2013. “Social networks, information acquisition, and asset prices.” Management Science, 59(6): 1444–1457.
  18. Herskovic, Bernard, and Joao Ramos. 2020. “Acquiring information through peers.” American Economic Review, 110(7): 2128–52.
  19. Lee, Hau L, Kut C So, and Christopher S Tang. 2000. “The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain.” Management Science, 46(5): 626–643.
  20. Leister, C Matthew. 2020. “Information acquisition and welfare in network games.” Games and Economic Behavior, 122: 453–475.
  21. Li, Lode. 1985. “Cournot oligopoly with information sharing.” The RAND Journal of Economics, 521–536.
  22. Li, Lode. 2002. “Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition.” Management Science, 48(9): 1196–1212.
  23. Liu, Zekun, Dennis J Zhang, and Fuqiang Zhang. 2021. “Information sharing on retail platforms.” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(3): 606–619.
  24. Murayama, Kota. 2019. “Social value of information in networked economies.” Mimeo.
  25. Myatt, David P, and Chris Wallace. 2012. “Endogenous information acquisition in coordination games.” The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1): 340–374.
  26. Myatt, David P, and Chris Wallace. 2018. “Information use and acquisition in price-setting oligopolies.” The Economic Journal, 128(609): 845–886.
  27. Myatt, David P, and Chris Wallace. 2019. “Information acquisition and use by networked players.” Journal of Economic Theory, 182: 360–401.
  28. Ozsoylev, Han N, and Johan Walden. 2011. “Asset pricing in large information networks.” Journal of Economic Theory, 146(6): 2252–2280.
  29. Page, Lionel, and Christoph Siemroth. 2017. “An experimental analysis of information acquisition in prediction markets.” Games and Economic Behavior, 101: 354–378.
  30. Yang, Ming. 2015. “Coordination with flexible information acquisition.” Journal of Economic Theory, 158: 721–738.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.