Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Experimental demonstration of improved quantum optimization with linear Ising penalties

Published 8 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.05476v2)

Abstract: The standard approach to encoding constraints in quantum optimization is the quadratic penalty method. Quadratic penalties introduce additional couplings and energy scales, which can be detrimental to the performance of a quantum optimizer. In quantum annealing experiments performed on a D-Wave Advantage, we explore an alternative penalty method that only involves linear Ising terms and apply it to a customer data science problem. Our findings support our hypothesis that the linear Ising penalty method should improve the performance of quantum optimization compared to using the quadratic penalty method due to its more efficient use of physical resources. Although the linear Ising penalty method is not guaranteed to exactly implement the desired constraint in all cases, it is able to do so for the majority of problem instances we consider. For problems with many constraints, where making all penalties linear is unlikely to be feasible, we investigate strategies for combining linear Ising penalties with quadratic penalties to satisfy constraints for which the linear method is not well-suited. We find that this strategy is most effective when the penalties that contribute most to limiting the dynamic range are removed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. R. Au-Yeung, N. Chancellor, and P. Halffmann, Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology 2, 1128576 (2023).
  3. R. Orús, S. Mugel, and E. Lizaso, Reviews in Physics 4, 100028 (2019).
  4. D. Venturelli and A. Kondratyev, Quantum Machine Intelligence 1, 17 (2019).
  5. D. M. Fox, K. M. Branson, and R. C. Walker, PLOS ONE 16, 1 (2021).
  6. M. W. Johnson et al., Nature 473, 194 (2011).
  7. T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Physical Review E 58, 5355 (1998).
  8. D-Wave Systems, QPU-Specific Physical Properties: Advantage_system6.3 (2023), D-Wave User Manual 09-1272A-C.
  9. V. Choi, Quantum Information Processing 7, 193 (2008).
  10. J. Chen, T. Stollenwerk, and N. Chancellor, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 2, 1 (2021).
  11. M. Ohzeki, Scientific Reports 10, 3126 (2020).
  12. L. Meredith and D. Maki, Applied Economics 33, 1785 (2001).
  13. C. Aguilar-Palacios, S. Munoz-Romero, and J. L. Rojo-Alvarez, IEEE Access 9, 34078 (2021).
  14. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering (Springer New York, 2006).
  15. N. Van Thoai, in Advanced Computational Methods for Knowledge Engineering, edited by N. T. Nguyen, T. van Do, and H. A. le Thi (Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg, 2013) pp. 3–17.
  16. I. Hen and F. M. Spedalieri, Physical Review Applied 5, 034007 (2016).
  17. I. Hen and M. S. Sarandy, Physical Review A 93, 062312 (2016).
  18. W. Lechner, P. Hauke, and P. Zoller, Science Advances 1, 1 (2015).
  19. T. Vyskocil and H. Djidjev, Algorithms 12, 1 (2019).
  20. P. D. de la Grand’rive and J.-F. Hullo, Knapsack Problem variants of QAOA for battery revenue optimisation (2019), arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02210.
  21. R. L. Stratonovich, in Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 2 (1957) p. 416.
  22. J. Hubbard, Physical Review Letters 3, 77 (1959).
  23. M. Kuramata, R. Katsuki, and K. Nakata, in 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) (IEEE, 2021) pp. 556–565.
  24. A. Callison and N. Chancellor, Phys. Rev. A 106, 010101 (2022).
  25. G. van Rossum and F. L. Drake Jr, Python tutorial (Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, 1995).
  26. J. D. Hunter, Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 90 (2007).
  27. M. Zaman, K. Tanahashi, and S. Tanaka, IEEE Transactions on Computers 71, 838 (2022).
  28. Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual (2023).
  29. D-Wave Systems, D-Wave Ocean SDK (2024), [Online; accessed 25-March-2024].
  30. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Science 220, 671 (1983).
  31. A. D. King and W. Bernoudy, Performance benefits of increased qubit connectivity in quantum annealing 3-dimensional spin glasses (2020), arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.12479.
  32. M. K. Haghighi and N. Dimopoulos, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), Vol. 2 (IEEE, 2023) pp. 318–319.
  33. E. L. Lehmann, Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 1242 (1993).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.