Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Technical Noise, Data Quality, and Calibration Requirements for Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Science (2404.04761v1)

Published 7 Apr 2024 in astro-ph.IM and gr-qc

Abstract: The next generation of ground-based gravitational-wave interferometers is expected to generate a bounty of new astrophysical discoveries, with sensitivities and bandwidths greatly improved compared to current-generation detectors. These detectors will allow us to make exceptional advancements in our understanding of fundamental physics, the dynamics of dense matter, and the cosmic history of compact objects. The fundamental design aspects of these planned interferometers will enable these new discoveries; however, challenges in technical noise, data quality, and calibration have the potential to limit the scientific reach of these instruments. In this work, we evaluate the requirements of these elements for next-generation gravitational-wave science, focusing on how these areas may impact the proposed Cosmic Explorer observatory. We highlight multiple aspects of these fields where additional research and development is required to ensure Cosmic Explorer reaches its full potential.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (122)
  1. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 161101 (Preprint 1710.05832)
  2. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2019 Phys. Rev. X 031040 (Preprint 1811.12907)
  3. Abbott R et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021053 (Preprint 2010.14527)
  4. Abbott R et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2021 ArXiv:2108.01045 Preprint 2108.01045
  5. Aasi J et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 074001 (Preprint 1411.4547)
  6. Acernese F et al. (Virgo) 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 024001 (Preprint 1408.3978)
  7. Akutsu T et al. (KAGRA) 2019 Nature Astron. 3 35–40 (Preprint 1811.08079)
  8. Buikema A et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 062003 (Preprint 2008.01301)
  9. Acernese F et al. (Virgo) 2023 Class. Quant. Grav. 40 185006 (Preprint 2210.15633)
  10. Abe H et al. (KAGRA) 2023 PTEP 2023 10A101 (Preprint 2203.07011)
  11. Akutsu T et al. (KAGRA) 2021 PTEP 2021 05A102 (Preprint 2009.09305)
  12. Evans M et al. 2021 Preprint 2109.09882
  13. Punturo M et al. 2010 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 194002
  14. Ackley K et al. 2020 Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 37 e047 (Preprint 2007.03128)
  15. Hall E D et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103 122004 (Preprint 2012.03608)
  16. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2016 Class. Quant. Grav. 33 134001 (Preprint 1602.03844)
  17. Nuttall L K 2018 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376 20170286 (Preprint 1804.07592)
  18. Davis D et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2021 Class. Quant. Grav. 38 135014 (Preprint 2101.11673)
  19. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2020 Class. Quant. Grav. 37 055002 (Preprint 1908.11170)
  20. Davis D and Walker M 2022 Galaxies 10 12
  21. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2018 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 065010 (Preprint 1710.02185)
  22. Powell J 2018 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 155017 (Preprint 1803.11346)
  23. Berger B K et al. 2023 Applied Physics Letters 122 184101
  24. Sun L et al. 2020 Class. Quant. Grav. 37 225008 (Preprint 2005.02531)
  25. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2017 Phys. Rev. D 95 062003 (Preprint 1602.03845)
  26. Essick R 2022 Phys. Rev. D 105 082002 (Preprint 2202.00823)
  27. Cahillane C et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2017 Phys. Rev. D96 102001 (Preprint 1708.03023)
  28. Karki S, Bhattacharjee D and Savage R L 2022 Galaxies 10 42
  29. Abbott B P et al. 2016 Phys. Rev. D 93 112004 [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 059901 (2018)] (Preprint 1604.00439)
  30. Meadors G D, Kawabe K and Riles K 2014 Class. Quant. Grav. 31 105014 (Preprint 1311.6835)
  31. Barsotti L, Evans M and Fritschel P 2010 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 084026
  32. Sidles J A and Sigg D 2006 Phys. Lett. A 354 167–72
  33. Kasprzack M 2021 ASC noise budgeting for LLO Tech. Rep. DCC-G2100751 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G2100751/public
  34. Maggiore R et al. 2024 Preprint 2401.13013
  35. Kuns K et al. 2020 Cosmic Explorer strain sensitivity Tech. Rep. CE-T2000017 Cosmic Explorer https://dcc.cosmicexplorer.org/CE-T2000017/public
  36. Rollins J and Creighton J inspiral-range: version 0.9.1 https://git.ligo.org/gwinc/inspiral-range/tree/0.9.1
  37. Pratten G et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103 104056 (Preprint 2004.06503)
  38. Aghanim N et al. (Planck) 2020 Astron. Astrophys. 641 A6 [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] (Preprint 1807.06209)
  39. Damour T, Nagar A and Villain L 2012 Phys. Rev. D 85 123007 (Preprint 1203.4352)
  40. Borhanian S and Sathyaprakash B S 2022 Preprint 2202.11048
  41. Sathyaprakash B S and Dhurandhar S V 1991 Phys. Rev. D 44 3819–34
  42. Grant A M and Nichols D A 2023 Phys. Rev. D 107 064056 [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 029901 (2023)] (Preprint 2210.16266)
  43. Lenon A K, Brown D A and Nitz A H 2021 Phys. Rev. D 104 063011 (Preprint 2103.14088)
  44. Saini P 2023 Preprint 2308.07565
  45. Accadia T et al. 2010 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 194011
  46. Soni S et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2020 Class. Quant. Grav. 38 025016 (Preprint 2007.14876)
  47. Nguyen P et al. (AdvLIGO) 2021 Class. Quant. Grav. 38 145001 (Preprint 2101.09935)
  48. Acernese F et al. (Virgo) 2022 Class. Quant. Grav. 39 235009 (Preprint 2203.04014)
  49. Janssens K et al. 2023 Phys. Rev. D 107 022004 (Preprint 2209.00284)
  50. Nitz A H 2018 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 035016 (Preprint 1709.08974)
  51. Messick C et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. D 95 042001 (Preprint 1604.04324)
  52. Usman S A et al. 2016 Class. Quant. Grav. 33 215004 (Preprint 1508.02357)
  53. Collaboration L S 2018 In Preparation
  54. Godwin P et al. 2020 Preprint 2010.15282
  55. Beauville F et al. 2006 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 32 212 (Preprint gr-qc/0509041)
  56. Goncharov B, Nitz A H and Harms J 2022 Phys. Rev. D 105 122007 (Preprint 2204.08533)
  57. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2019 Phys. Rev. D 100 064064 (Preprint 1906.08000)
  58. Macas R, Lundgren A and Ashton G 2023 Preprint 2311.09921
  59. Udall R and Davis D 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 094103 (Preprint 2211.15867)
  60. Bondarescu R, Lundgren A and Macas R 2023 Phys. Rev. D 108 122004 (Preprint 2309.06594)
  61. Cornish N J and Littenberg T B 2015 Class. Quant. Grav. 32 135012 (Preprint 1410.3835)
  62. Pankow C et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. D98 084016 (Preprint 1808.03619)
  63. Ashton G 2023 Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 2983–94 (Preprint 2209.15547)
  64. Carr B and Kuhnel F 2020 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 355–94 (Preprint 2006.02838)
  65. Himemoto Y, Nishizawa A and Taruya A 2021 Phys. Rev. D 104 044010 (Preprint 2103.14816)
  66. Hu Q and Veitch J 2023 Astrophys. J. 945 103 (Preprint 2210.04769)
  67. Kumar S, Nitz A H and Forteza X J 2022 Preprint 2202.12762
  68. Biswas A, McIver J and Mahabal A 2020 Class. Quant. Grav. 37 175008 (Preprint 1910.12143)
  69. Coughlin M et al. 2017 Class. Quant. Grav. 34 044004 (Preprint 1611.09812)
  70. Biscans S et al. 2018 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 055004 (Preprint 1707.03466)
  71. Schwartz E et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2020 Class. Quant. Grav. 37 235007 (Preprint 2007.12847)
  72. Colpi M and Sesana A 2017 Gravitational Wave Sources in the Era of Multi-Band Gravitational Wave Astronomy pp 43–140 (Preprint 1610.05309)
  73. Fairhurst S 2011 Class. Quant. Grav. 28 105021 (Preprint 1010.6192)
  74. Davis D et al. 2021 Data Quality Vetoes Applied to the Analysis of LIGO Data from the Second Observing Run Tech. Rep. DCC-T2100150 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2100150/public
  75. Davis D et al. 2021 Data Quality Vetoes Applied to the Analysis of LIGO Data from the Third Observing Run Tech. Rep. DCC-T2100045 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2100045/public
  76. Goetz E and Riles K 2023 Segments used for creating standard SFTs in O3 data Tech. Rep. DCC-T2300068 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2300068/public
  77. Goetz E et al. 2021 O3a lines and combs in found in self-gated C01 data Tech. Rep. DCC-T2100153 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2100153/public
  78. Covas P B et al. (LSC) 2018 Phys. Rev. D 97 082002 (Preprint 1801.07204)
  79. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo) 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 062002 (Preprint 1707.02667)
  80. Tenorio R, Keitel D and Sintes A M 2021 Universe 7 474 (Preprint 2111.12575)
  81. Riles K 2023 Living Rev. Rel. 26 3 (Preprint 2206.06447)
  82. Wette K 2023 Astropart. Phys. 153 102880 (Preprint 2305.07106)
  83. ATNF pulsar catalogue, v1.71 https://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/index.html?version=1.71 accessed: 2024-01-08
  84. O3 instrumental lines https://gwosc.org/O3/o3speclines/ accessed: 2024-01-08
  85. Tuyenbayev D et al. 2017 Class. Quant. Grav. 34 015002 (Preprint 1608.05134)
  86. Viets A et al. 2018 Class. Quant. Grav. 35 095015 (Preprint 1710.09973)
  87. Starkman T 2023 aLIGO LHO Logbook 71501
  88. Driggers J et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2019 Phys. Rev. D 99 042001 (Preprint 1806.00532)
  89. Viets A and Wade M 2021 Subtracting Narrow-band Noise from LIGO Strain Data in the Third Observing Run Tech. Rep. DCC-T2100058 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2100058/public
  90. Yu H and Adhikari R X 2022 Front. Artif. Intell. 5 811563 (Preprint 2111.03295)
  91. Coughlin M W et al. 2016 Class. Quant. Grav. 33 224003 (Preprint 1606.01011)
  92. Coughlin M W et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. D 97 102007 (Preprint 1802.00885)
  93. Maggiore M et al. 2020 JCAP 03 050 (Preprint 1912.02622)
  94. Wong I C F and Li T G F 2022 Phys. Rev. D 105 084002 (Preprint 2108.05108)
  95. Lindblom L 2009 Phys. Rev. D 80 042005 (Preprint 0906.5153)
  96. Sun L et al. 2021 Preprint 2107.00129
  97. Acernese F et al. (Virgo) 2022 Class. Quant. Grav. 39 045006 (Preprint 2107.03294)
  98. Read J 2023 Classical and Quantum Gravity 40 135002 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acd29b
  99. Schutz B F 2018 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 376 20170279 (Preprint 1804.06308)
  100. Chatziioannou K 2020 General Relativity and Gravitation 52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02754-3
  101. Buonanno A and Chen Y 2002 Phys. Rev. D 65 042001 (Preprint gr-qc/0107021)
  102. Ward R L 2010 Length Sensing and Control of a Prototype Advanced Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector Ph.D. thesis Caltech Pasadena, CA
  103. Hall E 2017 Long-Baseline Laser Interferometry for the Detection of Binary Black-Hole Mergers Ph.D. thesis Caltech Pasadena, CA
  104. Elliot H 2005 Analysis of the Frequency Dependence of LIGO Directional Sensitivity (Antenna Pattern) and Implications for Detector Calibration Tech. Rep. DCC-T050136 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T050136/public
  105. Martynov D et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. D 99 102004 (Preprint 1901.03885)
  106. Rakhmanov M, Romano J D and Whelan J T 2008 Class. Quant. Grav. 25 184017 (Preprint 0808.3805)
  107. Essick R, Vitale S and Evans M 2017 Physical Review D 96 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.96.084004
  108. Rakhmanov M 2006 Response of LIGO to Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies and in the Vicinity of the FSR Tech. Rep. DCC-T060237 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T060237/public
  109. Sigg D 1997 Strain Calibration in LIGO Tech. Rep. DCC-T970101 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T970101/public
  110. Goetz E et al. 2009 Class. Quant. Grav. 26 245011 (Preprint 0910.5591)
  111. Goetz E et al. 2010 Class. Quant. Grav. 27 084024 (Preprint 0911.0853)
  112. Hild S et al. 2007 Class. Quant. Grav. 24 5681–8 (Preprint 0710.1229)
  113. Estevez D, Mours B and Pradier T 2021 Class. Quant. Grav. 38 075012 (Preprint 2011.03728)
  114. Ross M P et al. 2021 Phys. Rev. D 104 082006 (Preprint 2107.00141)
  115. Goetz E and Savage R L 2010 Classical and Quantum Gravity 27 215001 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/21/215001
  116. Essick R and Holz D E 2019 Class. Quant. Grav. 36 125002 (Preprint 1902.08076)
  117. Schutz B F and Sathyaprakash B S 2020 Self-calibration of networks of gravitational wave detectors (Preprint 2009.10212)
  118. Abbott B P et al. (LIGO Scientific) 2009 Rept. Prog. Phys. 72 076901 (Preprint 0711.3041)
  119. Bartos I et al. 2011 Frequency Domain Calibration Error Budget for LIGO in S6 Tech. Rep. DCC-T1100071 LIGO https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1100071/public
  120. LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration 2023 GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — Data behind the figures https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997424
  121. LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration 2023 GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — O3 search sensitivity estimates https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7890437
  122. Pearson K 1895 Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series I 58 240–2
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets