Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Interpretable Multimodal Learning for Cardiovascular Hemodynamics Assessment

Published 6 Apr 2024 in cs.CV and cs.AI | (2404.04718v1)

Abstract: Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure (PAWP) is an essential cardiovascular hemodynamics marker to detect heart failure. In clinical practice, Right Heart Catheterization is considered a gold standard for assessing cardiac hemodynamics while non-invasive methods are often needed to screen high-risk patients from a large population. In this paper, we propose a multimodal learning pipeline to predict PAWP marker. We utilize complementary information from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) scans (short-axis and four-chamber) and Electronic Health Records (EHRs). We extract spatio-temporal features from CMR scans using tensor-based learning. We propose a graph attention network to select important EHR features for prediction, where we model subjects as graph nodes and feature relationships as graph edges using the attention mechanism. We design four feature fusion strategies: early, intermediate, late, and hybrid fusion. With a linear classifier and linear fusion strategies, our pipeline is interpretable. We validate our pipeline on a large dataset of $2,641$ subjects from our ASPIRE registry. The comparative study against state-of-the-art methods confirms the superiority of our pipeline. The decision curve analysis further validates that our pipeline can be applied to screen a large population. The code is available at https://github.com/prasunc/hemodynamics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. G. Savarese, P. M. Becher, L. H. Lund, P. Seferovic, G. M. Rosano, and A. J. Coats, “Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 118, no. 17, pp. 3272–3287, 2022.
  2. M. Emdin, S. Vittorini, C. Passino, and A. Clerico, “Old and new biomarkers of heart failure,” Eur. J. Heart Fail., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 331–335, 2009.
  3. P. B. Adamson, W. T. Abraham, R. C. Bourge, M. R. Costanzo, A. Hasan, C. Yadav, J. Henderson, P. Cowart, and L. W. Stevenson, “Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guides management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 935–944, 2014.
  4. P. Garg, R. Gosling, P. Swoboda, R. Jones, A. Rothman, J. M. Wild, D. G. Kiely, R. Condliffe, S. Alabed, and A. J. Swift, “Cardiac magnetic resonance identifies raised left ventricular filling pressure: prognostic implications,” Eur. Heart J., vol. 43, no. 26, pp. 2511–2522, 2022.
  5. M. R. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani, “A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI,” Med Image Anal ., vol. 30, pp. 108–119, 2016.
  6. H. Assadi, S. Alabed, A. Maiter, M. Salehi, R. Li, D. P. Ripley, R. J. Van der Geest, Y. Zhong, L. Zhong, A. J. Swift et al., “The role of artificial intelligence in predicting outcomes by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a comprehensive systematic review,” Medicina, vol. 58, no. 8, p. 1087, 2022.
  7. A. Fotaki, E. Puyol-Antón, A. Chiribiri, R. Botnar, K. Pushparajah, and C. Prieto, “Artificial intelligence in cardiac MRI: is clinical adoption forthcoming?” Front. Cardiovasc. Med., vol. 8, p. 818765, 2022.
  8. S. Alabed, F. Alandejani, K. Dwivedi, K. Karunasaagarar, M. Sharkey, P. Garg, P. J. de Koning, A. Tóth, Y. Shahin, C. Johns et al., “Validation of artificial intelligence cardiac MRI measurements: relationship to heart catheterization and mortality prediction,” Radiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2022.
  9. K. Vimalesvaran, F. Uslu, S. Zaman, C. Galazis, J. Howard, G. Cole, and A. A. Bharath, “Detecting aortic valve pathology from the 3-chamber cine cardiac MRI view,” in Proc. MICCAI, 2022, pp. 571–580.
  10. S. Priya, T. Aggarwal, C. Ward, G. Bathla, M. Jacob, A. Gerke, E. A. Hoffman, and P. Nagpal, “Radiomics side experiments and dafit approach in identifying pulmonary hypertension using cardiac mri derived radiomics based machine learning models,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 12686, 2021.
  11. D. Alkhanfar, K. Dwivedi, F. Alandejani, Y. Shahin, S. Alabed, C. Johns, P. Garg, A. Thompson, A. M. Rothman, A. Hameed et al., “Non-invasive detection of severe PH in lung disease using Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Front. Cardiovasc. Med., vol. 10, p. 1016994, 2023.
  12. G.-P. Diller, J. Vahle, R. Radke, M. L. B. Vidal, A. J. Fischer, U. M. Bauer, S. Sarikouch, F. Berger, P. Beerbaum, H. Baumgartner et al., “Utility of deep learning networks for the generation of artificial cardiac magnetic resonance images in congenital heart disease,” BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 1–8, 2020.
  13. A. J. Swift, H. Lu, J. Uthoff, P. Garg, M. Cogliano, J. Taylor, P. Metherall, S. Zhou, C. S. Johns, S. Alabed et al., “A machine learning cardiac magnetic resonance approach to extract disease features and automate pulmonary arterial hypertension diagnosis,” Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 236–245, 2021.
  14. J. Uthoff, S. Alabed, A. J. Swift, and H. Lu, “Geodesically smoothed tensor features for pulmonary hypertension prognosis using the heart and surrounding tissues,” in Proc. MICCAI, 2020, pp. 253–262.
  15. S. Alabed, J. Uthoff, S. Zhou, P. Garg, K. Dwivedi, F. Alandejani, R. Gosling, L. Schobs, M. Brook, Y. Shahin et al., “Machine learning cardiac-MRI features predict mortality in newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension,” European Heart Journal-Digital Health, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 265–275, 2022.
  16. A. H. Curiale, F. D. Colavecchia, and G. Mato, “Automatic quantification of the lv function and mass: A deep learning approach for cardiovascular MRI,” Comput Methods Programs Biomed, vol. 169, pp. 37–50, 2019.
  17. R. C. Gosling, G. Williams, A. Al Baraikan et al., “Quantifying myocardial blood flow and resistance using 4d-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 2023, 2023.
  18. E. Puyol-Antón, C. Chen, J. R. Clough et al., “Interpretable deep models for cardiac resynchronisation therapy response prediction,” in Proc. MICCAI, 2020, pp. 284–293.
  19. N. Ahmadi, M. Tsang, A. Gu, T. Tsang, and P. Abolmaesumi, “Transformer-based spatio-temporal analysis for classification of aortic stenosis severity from echocardiography cine series,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2023.
  20. L. A. Schobs, A. J. Swift, and H. Lu, “Uncertainty estimation for heatmap-based landmark localization,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1021–1034, 2022.
  21. H. Lu, K. N. Plataniotis, and A. N. Venetsanopoulos, “MPCA: Multilinear principal component analysis of tensor objects,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Netw., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 18–39, 2008.
  22. L. R. Soenksen, Y. Ma, C. Zeng, L. Boussioux, K. Villalobos Carballo, L. Na, H. M. Wiberg, M. L. Li, I. Fuentes, and D. Bertsimas, “Integrated multimodal artificial intelligence framework for healthcare applications,” NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 149, 2022.
  23. P. C. Tripathi, M. N. I. Suvon, L. Schobs, S. Zhou, S. Alabed, A. J. Swift, and H. Lu, “Tensor-based multimodal learning for prediction of pulmonary arterial wedge pressure from cardiac MRI,” in Proc. MICCAI, 2023, pp. 206–215.
  24. B. L. Welch, “The generalization of ‘student’s’problem when several different population varlances are involved,” Biometrika, vol. 34, no. 1-2, pp. 28–35, 1947.
  25. J. Hurdman, R. Condliffe, C. Elliot et al., “ASPIRE registry: assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary hypertension Identified at a REferral centre,” Eur. Respir. J., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 945–955, 2012.
  26. J. Li, K. Cheng, S. Wang, F. Morstatter, R. P. Trevino, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Feature selection: A data perspective,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1–45, 2017.
  27. T. Wang, W. Shao, Z. Huang, H. Tang, J. Zhang, Z. Ding, and K. Huang, “Mogonet integrates multi-omics data using graph convolutional networks allowing patient classification and biomarker identification,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 3445, 2021.
  28. P. Veličković, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Liò, and Y. Bengio, “Graph attention networks,” in Proc. ICLR, 2018.
  29. W. L. Hamilton, “Graph representation learning,” Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–159, 2020.
  30. R. Setiono and H. Liu, “Neural-network feature selector,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Netw., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 654–662, 1997.
  31. R. A. Amjad, K. Liu, and B. C. Geiger, “Understanding neural networks and individual neuron importance via information-ordered cumulative ablation,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 7842–7852, 2022.
  32. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, no. 56, pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
  33. M. Fey and J. E. Lenssen, “Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric,” in Proc. ICLR Workshop on Representation Learning on Graphs and Manifolds, 2019.
  34. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” in Proc. ICLR, 2015.
  35. D. Chicco and G. Jurman, “The advantages of the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation,” BMC Genomics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020.
  36. H. Lu, X. Liu, S. Zhou, R. Turner, P. Bai, R. E. Koot, M. Chasmai, L. Schobs, and H. Xu, “Pykale: Knowledge-aware machine learning from multiple sources in python,” in Proc. CIKM, 2022, pp. 4274–4278.
  37. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.
  38. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding, “Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1226–1238, 2005.
  39. J. Li, K. Cheng, S. Wang, F. Morstatter, R. P. Trevino, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Feature selection: A data perspective,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 50, no. 6, p. 94, 2018.
  40. I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik, “Gene selection for cancer classification using Support Vector Machines,” Machine Learning, vol. 46, pp. 389–422, 2002.
  41. A. J. Vickers and E. B. Elkin, “Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models,” Medical Decision Making, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 565–574, 2006.
  42. M. Sadatsafavi, A. Adibi, M. Puhan, A. Gershon, S. D. Aaron, and D. D. Sin, “Moving beyond AUC: decision curve analysis for quantifying net benefit of risk prediction models,” Eur. Respir. J., vol. 58, no. 5, 2021.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.