Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Universal Time-Entanglement Trade-off in Open Quantum Systems

Published 4 Apr 2024 in quant-ph | (2404.03625v2)

Abstract: We demonstrate a surprising connection between pure steady state entanglement and relaxation timescales in an extremely broad class of Markovian open systems, where two (possibly many-body) systems $A$ and $B$ interact locally with a common dissipative environment. This setup also encompases a broad class of adaptive quantum dynamics based on continuous measurement and feedback. As steady state entanglement increases, there is generically an emergent strong symmetry that leads to a dynamical slow down. Using this we can prove rigorous bounds on relaxation times set by steady state entanglement. We also find that this time must necessarily diverge for maximal entanglement. To test our bound, we consider the dynamics of a random ensemble of local Lindbladians that support pure steady states, finding that the bound does an excellent job of predicting how the dissipative gap varies with the amount of entanglement. Our work provides general insights into how dynamics and entanglement are connected in open systems, and has specific relevance to quantum reservoir engineering.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P08024 (2007).
  2. T. Kuwahara and K. Saito, Area law of noncritical ground states in 1d long-range interacting systems, Nature Communications 11, 4478 (2020).
  3. L. Masanes, Area law for the entropy of low-energy states, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052104 (2009).
  4. F. G. S. L. Brandão and M. Cramer, Entanglement area law from specific heat capacity, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115134 (2015).
  5. J. Cho, Sufficient condition for entanglement area laws in thermodynamically gapped spin systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 197204 (2014).
  6. S. Michalakis and J. P. Zwolak, Stability of frustration-free hamiltonians, Communications in Mathematical Physics 322, 277 (2013).
  7. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010).
  8. G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976).
  9. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n‐level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 821 (1976).
  10. M. J. Kastoryano and J. Eisert, Rapid mixing implies exponential decay of correlations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 54, 102201 (2013).
  11. D. Poulin, Lieb-robinson bound and locality for general markovian quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 190401 (2010).
  12. J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum reservoir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4728 (1996).
  13. M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Entangled light from white noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197901 (2002).
  14. B. Kraus and J. I. Cirac, Discrete entanglement distribution with squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 013602 (2004).
  15. S. G. Schirmer and X. Wang, Stabilizing open quantum systems by markovian reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062306 (2010).
  16. K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipative preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum-optical networks, New Journal of Physics 14, 063014 (2012).
  17. S. Zippilli and D. Vitali, Dissipative engineering of gaussian entangled states in harmonic lattices with a single-site squeezed reservoir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021).
  18. L. C. G. Govia, A. Lingenfelter, and A. A. Clerk, Stabilizing two-qubit entanglement by mimicking a squeezed environment, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023010 (2022).
  19. J. Angeletti, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Dissipative stabilization of entangled qubit pairs in quantum arrays with a single localized dissipative channel, Quantum Science and Technology 8, 035020 (2023).
  20. S. Zippilli, J. Li, and D. Vitali, Steady-state nested entanglement structures in harmonic chains with single-site squeezing manipulation, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032319 (2015).
  21. C. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  22. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum theory of optical feedback via homodyne detection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 548 (1993).
  23. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Squeezing via feedback, Phys. Rev. A 49, 1350 (1994).
  24. A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal quantum interactions and devices via autonomous feedforward, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013837 (2017).
  25. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum measurement and control (Cambridge university press, 2009).
  26. C. M. Caves and B. L. Schumaker, New formalism for two-photon quantum optics. i. quadrature phases and squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3068 (1985).
  27. C. C. Gerry, Dynamics of su(1,1) coherent states, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2721 (1985).
  28. B. Buča and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics 14, 073007 (2012).
  29. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, Phys. Today 54, 60 (2001).
  30. F. Fagnola and V. Umanita, Generators of detailed balance quantum markov semigroups, Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 10, 335 (2007).
  31. F. Fagnola and V. Umanità, Generators of kms symmetric markov semigroups on ℬ⁢(h)ℬℎ\mathcal{B}(h)caligraphic_B ( italic_h ) symmetry and quantum detailed balance, Communications in Mathematical Physics 298, 523 (2010).
  32. D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Driven-dissipative quantum kerr resonators: New exact solutions, photon blockade and quantum bistability, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021022 (2020).
  33. M. Tsang, Quantum reversal: a general theory of coherent quantum absorbers (2024), arXiv:2402.02502 [quant-ph] .
  34. J. c. v. Bensa and M. Žnidarič, Two-step phantom relaxation of out-of-time-ordered correlations in random circuits, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013228 (2022).
  35. G. Lee, A. McDonald, and A. Clerk, Anomalously large relaxation times in dissipative lattice models beyond the non-hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. B 108, 064311 (2023).
  36. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  37. T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016).
  38. A. McDonald, T. Pereg-Barnea, and A. A. Clerk, Phase-dependent chiral transport and effective non-hermitian dynamics in a bosonic kitaev-majorana chain, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041031 (2018).
  39. V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401 (2018).
  40. H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273 (1993).
  41. C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269 (1993).
  42. A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015).
  43. M. Žnidarič, Coexistence of diffusive and ballistic transport in a simple spin ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 070602 (2013).
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.