Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Social clustering reinforces external influence on the majority opinion model

Published 3 Apr 2024 in physics.soc-ph | (2404.02689v2)

Abstract: Public opinion is subject to peer interaction via social networks and external pressure from the media, advertising, and other actors. In this paper, we study the interaction between external and peer influence on the stochastic opinion dynamics of a majority vote model. We introduce a model where agents update their opinions based on the combined influence of their local neighbourhood (peers) and an external actor in the transition rates. In the first model, the external influence is only felt by agents non-aligned with the external actor ("push strategy"). In the second model, agents are affected by external influence, independently of their opinions ("nudging strategy"). In both cases, the external influence increases the possible macroscopic outcomes. These outcomes are determined by the chosen influence strategy. We also find that the social network structure affects the opinion dynamics, with social clustering positively reinforcing the external influence whereas degree heterogeneity weakens the external forces. These findings are relevant to businesses and policy making, helping to understand how groups of individuals collectively react to external actors.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.01.004.
  2. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591.
  3. doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.585383.
  4. doi:10.1119/1.1932559.
  5. doi:10.4018/jkss.2011100106.
  6. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3845.
  7. doi:10.1126/science.1177170.
  8. doi:10.1086/226707.
  9. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794.
  10. doi:10.1038/35065725.
  11. doi:10.1177/1368430216682350.
  12. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm014.
  13. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_17.
  14. doi:10.1093/biomet/60.3.581.
  15. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2019.05.004.
  16. doi:10.1086/521848.
  17. doi:10.1142/S0129183100000936.
  18. doi:10.1007/BF01060069.
  19. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041129.
  20. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052106.
  21. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/77/60005.
  22. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2012/04/P04003.
  23. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52458-w.
  24. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.127423.
  25. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2019.1625349.
  26. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012303.
  27. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043117.
  28. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.11.038.
  29. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.77.041121.
  30. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29405-7.
  31. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24704-6.
  32. doi:10.1209/epl/i2003-00490-0.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 28 likes about this paper.