Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Multidimensional deconvolution with shared bases

Published 2 Apr 2024 in math.NA and cs.NA | (2404.01870v1)

Abstract: We address the estimation of seismic wavefields by means of Multidimensional Deconvolution (MDD) for various redatuming applications. While offering more accuracy than conventional correlation-based redatuming methods, MDD faces challenges due to the ill-posed nature of the underlying inverse problem and the requirement to handle large, dense, complex-valued matrices. These obstacles have long limited the adoption of MDD in the geophysical community. Recent interest in this technology has spurred the development of new strategies to enhance the robustness of the inversion process and reduce its computational overhead. We present a novel approach that extends the concept of block low-rank approximations, usually applied to linear operators, to simultaneously compress the operator, right-hand side, and unknowns. This technique greatly alleviates the data-heavy nature of MDD. Moreover, since in 3d applications the matrices do not lend themselves to global low rank approximations, we introduce a novel H2-like approximation. We aim to streamline MDD implementations, fostering efficiency and controlling accuracy in wavefield reconstruction. This innovation holds potential for broader applications in the geophysical domain, possibly revolutionizing the analysis of multi-dimensional seismic datasets.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. 3d salt and overthrust models. In SEG/EAGE Modeling Series, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1997. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  2. A. Bakulin and R. Calvert. The virtual source method: Theory and case study. Geophysics, 71(4):SI139–SI150, 2006.
  3. D. Boiero and C. Bagaini. Up and down deconvolution in complex geological scenarios. Geophysics, 86(5):WC55–WC65, 2021.
  4. S. Börm. Efficient numerical methods for non-local operators: H2-matrix compression, algorithms and analysis, volume 14. European Mathematical Society, 2010.
  5. A physics-aware, low-rank regularization for multidimensional deconvolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11004, 2023.
  6. Solving multi-dimensional deconvolution via a nuclear-norm regularized least-squares approach. In 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, volume 2023, pages 1–5. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2023.
  7. Reflection images from ambient seismic noise. Geophysics, 74(5):A63–A67, 2009.
  8. J. T. Fokkema and P. M. van den Berg. Seismic applications of acoustic reciprocity. Elsevier, 2013.
  9. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 73(2):325–348, Dec. 1987.
  10. On ℋ2superscriptℋ2\mathcal{H}^{2}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-matrices. In H.-J. Bungartz, et al. (eds.), Lectures on Applied Mathematics, pages 9–30. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2000.
  11. Accelerating seismic redatuming using tile low-rank approximations on NEC SX-aurora TSUBASA. 2021.
  12. HPC seismic redatuming by inversion with algebraic compression and multiple precisions. 2022.
  13. Transform-domain multidimensional deconvolution–sparsity v/s low-rank. In 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, volume 2022, pages 1–5. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2022.
  14. Closed-aperture unbounded acoustics experimentation using multidimensional deconvolution. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(3):1813–1828, 2021.
  15. Scaling the “memory wall” for multi-dimensional seismic processing with algebraic compression on Cerebras CS-2 systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 1–12, 2023.
  16. N. Luiken and T. Van Leeuwen. Seismic wavefield redatuming with regularized multi-dimensional deconvolution. Inverse Problems, 36(9):095010, 2020.
  17. Singular-value decomposition analysis for seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011, pages 2694–2699. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011.
  18. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 8(1):43–71, 1982.
  19. Tile-low rank compressed multi-dimensional convolution and its application to seismic redatuming problems. In 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, volume 2022, pages 1–5. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2022.
  20. Large-scale Marchenko imaging with distance-aware matrix reordering, tile low-rank compression, and mixed-precision computations. In Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, pages 2606–2610. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2022.
  21. Stochastic multi-dimensional deconvolution. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60:1–14, 2022.
  22. High-resolution lithospheric imaging with seismic interferometry. Geophysical Journal International, 183(1):339–357, 2010.
  23. Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging. Geophysical Journal International, 157(2):838–852, 2004.
  24. G. T. Schuster and M. Zhou. A theoretical overview of model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. Geophysics, 71(4):SI103–SI110, 2006.
  25. Simple non-extensive sparsification of the hierarchical matrices. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 46(4):52, 2020.
  26. R. Tauler and D. Barceló. Multivariate curve resolution applied to liquid chromatography—diode array detection. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 12(8):319–327, 1993.
  27. Selectivity, local rank, three-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. Journal of Chemometrics, 9(1):31–58, 1995.
  28. Interferometric redatuming by sparse inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 192(2):666–670, 2013.
  29. Target-enclosed seismic imaging. Geophysics, 82(6):Q53–Q66, 2017.
  30. Controlled-source interferometric redatuming by crosscorrelation and multidimensional deconvolution in elastic media. Geophysics, 76(4):SA63–SA76, 2011.
  31. Time-domain multidimensional deconvolution: A physically reliable and stable preconditioned implementation. Remote Sensing, 13(18):3683, 2021.
  32. Scattering-based focusing for imaging in highly complex media from band-limited, multicomponent data. Geophysics, 86(5):WC141–WC157, 2021.
  33. K. Wapenaar and J. Fokkema. Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry. Geophysics, 71(4):SI33–SI46, 2006.
  34. Seismic and electromagnetic controlled-source interferometry in dissipative media. Geophysical prospecting, 56(3):419–434, 2008.
  35. Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: A systematic comparison. Geophysical Journal International, 185(3):1335–1364, 2011.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.