Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Analysis of Hadronic Weak Decays of Charmed Baryons in the Topological Diagrammatic Approach

Published 31 Mar 2024 in hep-ph and hep-ex | (2404.01350v2)

Abstract: We perform a global fit to the experimental data of two-body charmed baryon decays based on the topological diagrammatic approach (TDA) and take into account the phase shifts between $S$- and $P$-wave amplitudes as inspired by the recent BESIII measurement of the decay asymmetry in the decay $\Lambda_c+\to \Xi0K+$. The TDA has the advantage that it is more intuitive, graphic and easier to implement model calculations. The measured branching fractions and decay asymmetries are well accommodated in the TDA except for a few modes, in particular, the predicted ${\cal B}(\Xi_c0\to \Xi-\pi+)=(2.83\pm0.10)\%$ is larger than its current value. The equivalence of the TDA and the irreducible SU(3) approach (IRA) is established. We show that the number of the minimum set of tensor invariants in the IRA and the topological amplitudes in the TDA is the same and present their relations. The predicted magnitudes of $S$- and $P$-wave amplitudes and their phase shifts are presented for measured and yet-to-be-measured modes in both the TDA and IRA which can be tested in the near future. Besides the decay $\Lambda_c+\to \Xi0 K+$, there exist several modes which proceed only through $W$-exchange. In particular, the observed channel $\Xi_c0\to \Sigma+ K-$ should have phase shifts similar to that in $\Lambda_c+\to \Xi0 K+$ and its decay asymmetry is predicted to be $-0.21\pm0.17$ which can be used to test our theoretical framework. In contrast, the TDA leads to a large $\alpha$ of order $-0.93$ for the decay $\Xi_c+\to \Xi0\pi+$ even after the phase-shift effect is incorporated in the fit.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. H. Y. Cheng, “Charm baryon production and decays,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, Suppl. 1 (2009) 593 [arXiv:0809.1869 [hep-ex]], Chap. 24 .
  2. H. Y. Cheng, “Charmed baryons circa 2015,” Front. Phys. 10, 101406 (2015) [arXiv:1508.07233 [hep-ph]].
  3. H. Y. Cheng, “Charmed baryon physics circa 2021,” Chin. J. Phys. 78, 324-362 (2022) [arXiv:2109.01216 [hep-ph]].
  4. M. J. Savage and R. P. Springer, “SU(3) Predictions for Charmed Baryon Decays,” Phys. Rev. D 42, 1527 (1990); M. J. Savage, “SU(3) violations in the nonleptonic decay of charmed hadrons,” Phys. Lett. B 257, 414 (1991).
  5. S. M. Sheikholeslami, M. P. Khanna, and R. C. Verma, “Cabibbo enhanced weak decays of charmed baryons in the SU(4) semidynamical scheme,” Phys. Rev. D 43, 170 (1991); R. C. Verma and M. P. Khanna, “Cabibbo favored hadronic decays of charmed baryons in flavor SU(3),” Phys. Rev. D 53, 3723 (1996).
  6. K. K. Sharma and R. C. Verma, “SU(3) flavor analysis of two-body weak decays of charmed baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 55, 7067 (1997) [hep-ph/9704391].
  7. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao and Y. H. Lin, “Non-leptonic two-body weak decays of Λc⁢(2286)subscriptΛ𝑐2286\Lambda_{c}(2286)roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2286 ),” Phys. Lett. B 776, 265 (2018) [arXiv:1708.02460 [hep-ph]].
  8. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu and T. H. Tsai, “Charmed Baryon Weak Decays with SU(3) Flavor Symmetry,” JHEP 1711, 147 (2017) [arXiv:1709.00808 [hep-ph]].
  9. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu and T. H. Tsai, “Anti-triplet charmed baryon decays with SU(3) Flavor Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 7, 073006 (2018) [arXiv:1801.03276 [hep-ph]].
  10. C. D. Lu, W. Wang and F. S. Yu, “Test flavor SU(3) symmetry in exclusive ΛcsubscriptΛ𝑐\Lambda_{c}roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decays,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 056008 (2016) [arXiv:1601.04241 [hep-ph]].
  11. Y. K. Hsiao, Y. Yao and H. J. Zhao, “Two-body charmed baryon decays involving vector meson with S⁢U⁢(3)𝑆𝑈3SU(3)italic_S italic_U ( 3 ) flavor symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 792, 35-39 (2019) [arXiv:1902.08783 [hep-ph]].
  12. C. P. Jia, D. Wang and F. S. Yu, “Charmed baryon decays in S⁢U⁢(3)F𝑆𝑈subscript3𝐹SU(3)_{F}italic_S italic_U ( 3 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 956, 115048 (2020) [arXiv:1910.00876 [hep-ph]].
  13. X. G. He, Y. J. Shi and W. Wang, “Unification of Flavor SU(3) Analyses of Heavy Hadron Weak Decays,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.5, 359 (2020) [arXiv:1811.03480 [hep-ph]].
  14. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu and T. H. Tsai, “Asymmetries of anti-triplet charmed baryon decays,” Phys. Lett. B 794, 19-28 (2019) [arXiv:1902.06189 [hep-ph]].
  15. H. Zhong, F. Xu, Q. Wen and Y. Gu, “Weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons from the perspective of flavor symmetry,” JHEP 02, 235 (2023) [arXiv:2210.12728 [hep-ph]].
  16. Z. P. Xing, X. G. He, F. Huang and C. Yang, “Global analysis of measured and unmeasured hadronic two-body weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.5, 053004 (2023) [arXiv:2305.14854 [hep-ph]].
  17. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, T. H. Tsai and Y. Yu, “Charmed Baryon Weak Decays with Decuplet Baryon and SU(3) Flavor Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 99, no.11, 114022 (2019) [arXiv:1904.11271 [hep-ph]].
  18. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu and T. H. Tsai, “Charmed Baryon Weak Decays with Vector Mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.5, 053002 (2020) [arXiv:2001.05079 [hep-ph]].
  19. F. Huang, Z. P. Xing and X. G. He, “A global analysis of charmless two body hadronic decays for anti-triplet charmed baryons,” JHEP 03, 143 (2022) [erratum: JHEP 09, 087 (2022)] [arXiv:2112.10556 [hep-ph]].
  20. Y. Kohara, “Quark diagram analysis of charmed baryon decays,” Phys. Rev. D 44, 2799-2802 (1991).
  21. L. L. Chau, H. Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, “Analysis of two-body decays of charmed baryons using the quark diagram scheme,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 2132-2160 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9508382 [hep-ph]].
  22. Y. K. Hsiao, Y. L. Wang and H. J. Zhao, “Equivalent SU(3)f𝑓{}_{f}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT approaches for two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays,” JHEP 09, 035 (2022) [arXiv:2111.04124 [hep-ph]].
  23. H. J. Zhao, Y. L. Wang, Y. K. Hsiao and Y. Yu, “A diagrammatic analysis of two-body charmed baryon decays with flavor symmetry,” JHEP 02, 165 (2020) [arXiv:1811.07265 [hep-ph]].
  24. Y. K. Hsiao, Q. Yi, S. T. Cai and H. J. Zhao, “Two-body charmed baryon decays involving decuplet baryon in the quark-diagram scheme,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.11, 1067 (2020) [arXiv:2006.15291 [hep-ph]].
  25. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, “Two-body hadronic charmed meson decays,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 074021 (2010) [arXiv:1001.0987 [hep-ph]]; “Direct CP violation in two-body hadronic charmed meson decays,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 034036 (2012) [arXiv:1201.0785 [hep-ph]]; “SU(3) symmetry breaking and CP violation in D→P⁢P→𝐷𝑃𝑃D\to PPitalic_D → italic_P italic_P decays,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 014014 (2012) [arXiv:1205.0580 [hep-ph]]. Phys. Rev. D 100, 093002 (2019); Phys. Rev. D 104, 073003 (2021).
  26. H. Y. Cheng, C. W. Chiang and A. L. Kuo, “Global analysis of two-body D→V⁢P→𝐷𝑉𝑃D\to V\!Pitalic_D → italic_V italic_P decays within the framework of flavor symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 114010 (2016) [arXiv:1604.03761 [hep-ph]].
  27. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, “Updated analysis of D→P⁢P,V⁢P→𝐷𝑃𝑃𝑉𝑃D\to PP,V\!Pitalic_D → italic_P italic_P , italic_V italic_P and V⁢V𝑉𝑉VVitalic_V italic_V decays: Implications for KS0−KL0superscriptsubscript𝐾𝑆0superscriptsubscript𝐾𝐿0K_{S}^{0}-K_{L}^{0}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT asymmetries and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-D¯0superscript¯𝐷0\overline{D}^{0}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mixing,” [arXiv:2401.06316 [hep-ph]].
  28. H. Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, “Cabibbo allowed nonleptonic weak decays of charmed baryons,” Phys. Rev. D 48, 4188-4202 (1993) [arXiv:hep-ph/9304286 [hep-ph]].
  29. C. Q. Geng, X. G. He, X. N. Jin, C. W. Liu and C. Yang, “Strong phase in Λc+→Ξ0⁢K+→superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑐superscriptΞ0superscript𝐾\Lambda_{c}^{+}\to\Xi^{0}K^{+}roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decay with flavor S⁢U⁢(3)F𝑆𝑈subscript3𝐹SU(3)_{F}italic_S italic_U ( 3 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetry,” [arXiv:2310.05491 [hep-ph]].
  30. H. Zhong, F. Xu and H. Y. Cheng, “Topological Diagrams and Hadronic Weak Decays of Charmed Baryons,” [arXiv:2401.15926 [hep-ph]].
  31. Y. Kohara, “Comments on ’Analysis of two-body decays of charmed baryons using the quark diagram scheme’,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9701287 [hep-ph]].
  32. J. G. Korner, “Octet behaviour of single-particle matrix elements ⟨B′|HW|B⟩quantum-operator-productsuperscript𝐵′subscript𝐻𝑊𝐵\langle B^{\prime}|H_{W}|B\rangle⟨ italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B ⟩ and ⟨M′|HW|M⟩quantum-operator-productsuperscript𝑀′subscript𝐻𝑊𝑀\langle M^{\prime}|H_{W}|M\rangle⟨ italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_M ⟩ using a weak current current quark Hamiltonian,” Nucl. Phys. B 25, 282-290 (1971); J. C. Pati and C. H. Woo, “Δ⁢I=1/2Δ𝐼12\Delta I=1/2roman_Δ italic_I = 1 / 2 rule with fermion quarks,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 2920-2922 (1971).
  33. L. L. Chau and H. Y. Cheng, “Analysis of two-body decays of charm mesons using the quark diagram scheme: Addendum on hairpin diagrams,” Phys. Rev.  D 39, 2788 (1989).
  34. L. L. Chau, H. Y. Cheng and T. Huang, “Ways to measure the hairpin diagram in charmed meson decays,” Z. Phys.  C 53, 413 (1992).
  35. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu and T. H. Tsai, “Singly Cabibbo suppressed decays of Λc+superscriptsubscriptΛ𝑐\Lambda_{c}^{+}roman_Λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with SU(3) flavor symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 790, 225-228 (2019) [arXiv:1812.08508 [hep-ph]].
  36. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Liu, “Study of singly heavy baryon lifetimes,” JHEP 07, 114 (2023) [arXiv:2305.00665 [hep-ph]].
Citations (8)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.